Senators reach deal ...

[wdmso]

Funny this deal gets passed and i didn't see any catchy

democrats kill virus relief bill

I have seen the Trump supporters on other sites,, still making outlandish claims still blaming democrats about the details of a bill

That Their President is going to sign unless Fox tells him something else

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Funny this deal gets passed and i didn't see any catchy

democrats kill virus relief bill

I have seen the Trump supporters on other sites,, still making outlandish claims still blaming democrats about the details of a bill

That Their President is going to sign unless Fox tells him something else

they killed
it earlier. that’s why you didn’t see anyone say they killed
it this time.

are you denying that senate democrats are the reason it didn’t get passed a few days ago?

When faced with a pandemic, every doctor says the first thing you need, is $35 million for the kennedy center for performing arts. that will keep us all healthy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

they killed
it earlier. that’s why you didn’t see anyone say they killed
it this time.

are you denying that senate democrats are the reason it didn’t get passed a few days ago?

When faced with a pandemic, every doctor says the first thing you need, is $35 million for the kennedy center for performing arts. that will keep us all healthy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And what would have been different 3 days ago except you complaining the dems killed it.

Your a Fox parrot just admit it

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

And what would have been different 3 days ago except you complaining the dems killed it.

Your a Fox parrot just admit it

if it passed three days ago, god knows how
many thousands of people
wouldn’t have been furloughed.

you can’t just say, the dems
killed it.

fox parrot? i hate sean hannity. the only one i watch occasionally is tucker carlson, who like
me, regularly criticized republicans and praises liberals.

you’re the parrot here. not me. when do you criticize liberals or praise conservatives? when have you ever done
that? on what major
issues do you disagree with liberals? We’re all
ears wayne, go ahead and tell us which major issues you side with conservatives on?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

if it passed three days ago, god knows how
many thousands of people
wouldn’t have been furloughed.

you can’t just say, the dems
killed it.

fox parrot? i hate sean hannity. the only one i watch occasionally is tucker carlson, who like
me, regularly criticized republicans and praises liberals.

you’re the parrot here. not me. when do you criticize liberals or praise conservatives? when have you ever done
that? on what major
issues do you disagree with liberals? We’re all
ears wayne, go ahead and tell us which major issues you side with conservatives on?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If you think 3 days would have changed things on the ground your not realistic
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

If you think 3 days would have changed things on the ground your not realistic
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Since you have so much experience in the private sector, you tell me how many Americans you think got furloughed in the last 72 hours?

I agree three days isn't the end of the world. But the fact is, the senate democrats killed it on Monday, and the did so because they wanted funding for liberal projects, some (not all) of which have absolutely nothing to do with helping sick people - do you agree with this, yes or no? Requiring that companies have officers in charge of inclusion and diversity? $35 million for the Kennedy center for the arts?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

if it passed three days ago, god knows how
many thousands of people
wouldn’t have been furloughed.

you can’t just say, the dems
killed it.

fox parrot? i hate sean hannity. the only one i watch occasionally is tucker carlson, who like
me, regularly criticized republicans and praises liberals.

you’re the parrot here. not me. when do you criticize liberals or praise conservatives? when have you ever done
that? on what major
issues do you disagree with liberals? We’re all
ears wayne, go ahead and tell us which major issues you side with conservatives on?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I just debunk your inaccuracies. As for being on conservative sides of things ..still waiting for them to do something postive
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

More IQ points lost, won’t be getting those back...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

More IQ points lost, won’t be getting those back...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Does that make you feel good?

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Does that make you feel good?

Does this make you feel good?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Does that make you feel good?

Weren't you the guy that said he only responds when somebody calls him out.

And did this make you feel better?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Weren't you the guy that said he only responds when somebody calls him out.

And did this make you feel better?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It did - to stick up for someone.

It is that I think responding to someone's posts (who isn't talking to you) and insulting their intelligence says something about them. I thought you were better than that but I'm prob. wrong since you seem to be doing that more and more.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by PaulS

It did - to stick up for someone.

Did you duck into a nearby phone booth to don your cape or do you walk around wearing it all the time?

WDMSO is a big boy and he can take care of himself.

It is that I think responding to someone's posts (who isn't talking to you) and insulting their intelligence says something about them. I thought you were better than that but I'm prob. wrong since you seem to be doing that more and more.

Because you've just been the perfect example of thoughtful and meaningful posts here lately.

Your posts lately are basically a mix of fighting with Jim, calling Scott snarky, or passing your holier than thou judgements on anybody that disagrees with your views, so spare me your thoughts about my character. I sleep fine at night.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Funny this deal gets passed and i didn't see any catchy

democrats kill virus relief bill

I have seen the Trump supporters on other sites,, still making outlandish claims still blaming democrats about the details of a bill

That Their President is going to sign unless Fox tells him something else

Wayne, don’t worry about his supporters. Hold you ground and control what you can control. We will get through this. Do you go on other sites to discuss politics also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Wayne, don’t worry about his supporters. Hold you ground and control what you can control. We will get through this. Do you go on other sites to discuss politics also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nope just here ,,, I'd still fish with anyone here , politics stay at the dock

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Nope just here ,,, I'd still fish with anyone here , politics stay at the dock

So what other sites are you referring to?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

So what other sites are you referring to?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I go read brightbart comments .. very entertaining to see what true trump believers think
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by wdmso

I go read brightbart comments .. very entertaining to see what true trump believers think
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So you read Breitbart and then come on hear feigning surprise that other “sites” have folks supporting Trump.

Is this how retirement is gonna go? Why not try happiness...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

I’m happy to dunk on Congress, but I don’t understand why some people think it should be quick, easy, and painless to get a majority to agree on how to spend two trillion dollars.

[Sea Dangles]

Ha, I get my fill here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Feel free to support all the fish tank cleaner imbibers you want.
Some hope that politicians look for support among the people not so easily confused
Apparently that is not the case with Trumplicans
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) worked to scupper the phase-three coronavirus relief package on Sunday after Majority Whip James Clyburn (D., S.C.) told caucus members last week that the bill was “a tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit our vision.”

Clyburn’s comments came on a Thursday call featuring more than 200 House Democrats, during which caucus members laid out a list of provisions they wanted to be included in the Senate’s trillion-dollar package."

[Sea Dangles]

🔨
MANGA
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Please Present all her Crimes ... and not just the imaginary one's... But those brought by law enforcement .... I can't wait

If a large portion of the population have the view that she committed some sort of crime, let's say, in the way she handled her emails, they are not holding an extreme view, that is, not holding a view that is the furthest from what would be considered "the center," or not holding a view that is held by so few that it is an "extreme" outlier.

There are enough people who think she committed a crime, that to consider their view to be an extreme one seems to be at least erroneous, or, more underhandedly, might be considered a biased tactic to marginalize and dismiss them. And further labeling them beyond that as vitriolic, or haters, is demeaning them as well. It is a pretty shady way to have a discussion.

And if you're trying frame the argument as one can only believe that a crime has been committed when it is brought by "law enforcement" (whatever that means), then your attempt at thought control is closer than you know to that "authoritarian" form of government that you accuse others of.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

If a large portion of the population have the view that she committed some sort of crime, let's say, in the way she handled her emails, they are not holding an extreme view, that is, not holding a view that is the furthest from what would be considered "the center," or not holding a view that is held by so few that it is an "extreme" outlier.

There are enough people who think she committed a crime, that to consider their view to be an extreme one seems to be at least erroneous, or, more underhandedly, might be considered a biased tactic to marginalize and dismiss them. And further labeling them beyond that as vitriolic, or haters, is demeaning them as well. It is a pretty shady way to have a discussion.

And if you're trying frame the argument as one can only believe that a crime has been committed when it is brought by "law enforcement" (whatever that means), then your attempt at thought control is closer than you know to that "authoritarian" form of government that you accuse others of.

Since when in America do we arrest people for crimes that in your words
" a large portion of the population have the view that she committed some sort of crime"

But all of law enforcement is unable to find any evidence of these imaginary crime and still have yet to arrest her..

you're trying frame the argument as one can only believe that a crime has been committed when it is brought by "law enforcement" (whatever that means),

Wow thats an amazing statment

Ps Pete was using your logic against you.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Since when in America do we arrest people for crimes that in your words
" a large portion of the population have the view that she committed some sort of crime"

Since when did I say we did?

But all of law enforcement is unable to find any evidence of these imaginary crime and still have yet to arrest her..

Since when has it been considered extreme or hateful or vitriolic for people to believe that law enforcement didn't do its job as it should have? We've had powerful civil rights movements based on law enforcement not doing its job. And most Americans don't consider all of those movements to be extreme, or hateful, or vitriolic. Perhaps, by your logic, we should consider them so.

you're trying frame the argument as one can only believe that a crime has been committed when it is brought by "law enforcement" (whatever that means),

Wow thats an amazing statment

It's amazing at what you find amazing.

Ps Pete was using your logic against you.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And I used his logic against you. And I didn't disagree with what he posted, so I don't see how it was against me. It seemed to me that he used the back and forth between you and me to rag on Trump.

[Pete F.]

Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that Donald Trump committed crimes before he became president, according to a new Quinnipiac poll conducted after Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen testified to Congress.

Among those surveyed, 64 percent believe that the president committed crimes before he was elected, with 24 percent saying they don’t think he did.

Those polled were split on whether they believe Trump has committed crimes while in office: According to the poll, 45 percent believe the president has, while 43 percent say he hasn’t.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that Donald Trump committed crimes before he became president, according to a new Quinnipiac poll conducted after Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen testified to Congress.

Among those surveyed, 64 percent believe that the president committed crimes before he was elected, with 24 percent saying they don’t think he did.

Those polled were split on whether they believe Trump has committed crimes while in office: According to the poll, 45 percent believe the president has, while 43 percent say he hasn’t.

According to wdmso's way of seeing these things, Quinnipiac must be extremist, vitriolic, and a hater since no crimes were specified but just a belief about general "crimes" that weren't "brought by law enforcement."