What’s Putin’s Puppet hiding?

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Spence, we give aid to Mexico and Syria. corruption there isn’t part of the problem?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You're talking about counter narcotics and humanitarian aid, not loan guarantees for economic development.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

You're talking about counter narcotics and humanitarian aid, not loan guarantees for economic development.

i see!

and it’s just a coincidence that this guy was supposedly going to question biden’s son.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i see!

and it’s just a coincidence that this guy was supposedly going to question biden’s son.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, I don't believe there was an investigation of Burisma active or pending at the time.

You do love your conspiracy theories though.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

No, I don't believe there was an investigation of Burisma active or pending at the time.

You do love your conspiracy theories though.

i ask questions, regardless of politics. you support everything from the left, nothing from
the right.

if that’s not true, please tell
us some major policy issues, where you don’t agree with the left.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by spence

I think the worst you could say is there was a potential conflict of interest. That being said, I've not seen one shred of evidence that there actually was one nor anything to support the conspiracy theories put forth by Rudy and Trump.

I don't know why you think Biden is done, if anything the odds of impeachment just went way up.

Jeff,is this the code red you speak of? Any predictions?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

You are so full of sh*t, Trump is out for Trump and family first. Please explain how extorting a foreign government in order to help his efforts in the 2020 election is good for America. I think you need to loosen the MAGA hit band, clearly it’s lessoning blood flow to brain cells you can ill afford to loss at this point.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I was not aware he had extorted a foreign government. Certainly this can not be good. Let’s launch another investigation.

Oh,and did you mean lose or loss? Spellcheck,cheaters ,or just extra stupid still?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Jeff,is this the code red you speak of? Any predictions?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If this story doesn't change direction and quick it very well could be. Looks like the whistle blower might testify this week.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by spence

If this story doesn't change direction and quick it very well could be. Looks like the whistle blower might testify this week.

Yes or no snowflake
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Adam Schiff
@RepAdamSchiff
We have been informed by the whistleblower’s counsel that their client would like to speak to our committee and has requested guidance from the Acting DNI as to how to do so.

We‘re in touch with counsel and look forward to the whistleblower’s testimony as soon as this week.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

If this story doesn't change direction and quick it very well could be. Looks like the whistle blower might testify this week.

the whistle blower
who didn’t even hear the conversation, but heard someone else describe the conversation?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Thanks for the update Peto. Let us know of any further developments.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

the whistle blower
who didn’t even hear the conversation, but heard someone else describe the conversation?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How do you know that?

Asking for Fudgie the Whale

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

How do you know that?

Asking for Fudgie the Whale

you can google it. it’s being reported that the whistleblower didn’t hear the call firsthand.

but as we see with kavanaugh, hearsay is sufficient to punish conservatives

trump also said he’s release the transcript of the call.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Meanwhile Trump tweets: I am currently at the United Nations representing our Country, but have authorized the release tomorrow of the complete, fully declassified and unredacted transcript of my phone conversation with President Zelensky of Ukraine....

And Michael McFaul tweets: This is a big mistake -- terrible precedent, as no foreign leaders in future will speak candidly with the president on any future calls. Don't release Trump-Zelensky or Trump-Putin transcripts of calls. Instead, release whistleblower's complaint to Congress, as required by law.

The complaint is rumored to be about multiple instances, one transcript does not tell the whole story. Perhaps that's the plan?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Meanwhile Trump tweets: I am currently at the United Nations representing our Country, but have authorized the release tomorrow of the complete, fully declassified and unredacted transcript of my phone conversation with President Zelensky of Ukraine....

And Michael McFaul tweets: This is a big mistake -- terrible precedent, as no foreign leaders in future will speak candidly with the president on any future calls. Don't release Trump-Zelensky or Trump-Putin transcripts of calls. Instead, release whistleblower's complaint to Congress, as required by law.

The complaint is rumored to be about multiple instances, one transcript does not tell the whole story. Perhaps that's the plan?

so the rumors that there were multiple calls is good enough for you, but you question the rumor that the whistleblower didn’t hear the call. interesting.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you can google it. it’s being reported that the whistleblower didn’t hear the call firsthand.

but as we see with kavanaugh, hearsay is sufficient to punish conservatives

trump also said he’s release the transcript of the call.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Reported on Faux, repeated by the Town Hall, Daily Wire, McCarthy, Nunes, Trump and the rest of the chorus.

Odd that the IG, a Trump appointee felt it was credible and urgent.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you can google it. it’s being reported that the whistleblower didn’t hear the call firsthand.

but as we see with kavanaugh, hearsay is sufficient to punish conservatives

trump also said he’s release the transcript of the call.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Someone with access to sensitive information like that isn't hearsay Jim, there's no way the IG would have deemed the complaint urgent if it wasn't sourced.

I haven't done this in a while but I'm mooting your post.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Reported on Faux, repeated by the Town Hall, Daily Wire, McCarthy, Nunes, Trump and the rest of the chorus.

Odd that the IG, a Trump appointee felt it was credible and urgent.

look at percentage of favorable/unfavorable coverage of obama and trump, for fox and every other American tv station.

fox has a major clown in prime
time, sean hannity. cnn and msnbc have nothing but sean hannity-like ideologues, throughout prime
time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i’ll ask again for a list of
meaningful policies, for which you disagree with liberals. or admit there aren’t any.

i think conservatives are dead wrong on gay marriage and the death penalty, and i think conservatives are too fanatically opposed to gun control.

you call me a trumplican. show me you’re anywhere near that independent.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Someone with access to sensitive information like that isn't hearsay Jim, there's no way the IG would have deemed the complaint urgent if it wasn't sourced.

I haven't done this in a while but I'm mooting your post.

it’s hearsay if the person reporting it, isn’t the one with access to the information. if they are repeating what someone else claims they said or heard, it’s hearsay. like the last kavanaugh accusation. in that case, hearsay was enough for all the major presidential
candidates to demand his impeachment.

let’s have the hearing, one more circus.

any chance you can ever list things you disagree with liberals
on? or at least admit that you wouldn’t dare disagree with obama
on anything, which is why you disappeared here for a month after the election, hiding under your bed s#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&g your thumb.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

it’s hearsay if the person reporting it, isn’t the one with access to the information.

How do you know that? So you think a non-partisan IG is going to forward a potentially impeachable or criminal complaint without being damn sure it's credible? This is stretching reality.

any chance you can ever list things you disagree with liberals
on? or at least admit that you wouldn’t dare disagree with obama
on anything, which is why you disappeared here for a month after the election, hiding under your bed s#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&g your thumb.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's a silly question as most issues fall on a spectrum. As for your other remark my brain was focused elsewhere for a bit, had nothing to do with the election.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

How do you know that? So you think a non-partisan IG is going to forward a potentially impeachable or criminal complaint without being damn sure it's credible? This is stretching reality.


It's a silly question as most issues fall on a spectrum. As for your other remark my brain was focused elsewhere for a bit, had nothing to do with the election.

i don’t know if it was hearsay, but it’s being reported. that’s why i asked you a question, that’s what that “?” thing at the end of a sentence implies.

it’s not remotely a silly question. it gets at whether or not you have the ability to think for yourself, or if you’re the exact mirror image of sean hannity.

do you think i believe your absence after the election, was a coincidence? give me a little credit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i don’t know if it was hearsay, but it’s being reported. that’s why i asked you a question, that’s what that “?” thing at the end of a sentence implies.

it’s not remotely a silly question. it gets at whether or not you have the ability to think for yourself, or if you’re the exact mirror image of sean hannity.

do you think i believe your absence after the election, was a coincidence? give me a little credit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

All I will say about the third point is bitches be crazy......
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

MCCONNELL has hotlined the resolution calling for the release of the whistleblower report.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

MCCONNELL has hotlined the resolution calling for the release of the whistleblower report.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and if he did that, it’s probably because he knows it’s a nothingburger.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

About time Nancy!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

and if he did that, it’s probably because he knows it’s a nothingburger.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

More likely it's because if the GOP looks like they're engaged in a cover up they'll lose the Senate.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by spence

How do you know that? So you think a non-partisan IG is going to forward a potentially impeachable or criminal complaint without being damn sure it's credible? This is stretching reality.


It's a silly question as most issues fall on a spectrum. As for your other remark my brain was focused elsewhere for a bit, had nothing to do with the election.

This is great,the old Jeff is back.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

More likely it's because if the GOP looks like they're engaged in a cover up they'll lose the Senate.

in all seriousness, have you seen which seats are up? favorable
to which side? 2018 was a dream board for the gop and they didn’t do much. i’m guessing the 33 seats up this time are more favorable to democrats.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

in all seriousness, have you seen which seats are up? favorable
to which side? 2018 was a dream board for the gop and they didn’t do much. i’m guessing the 33 seats up this time are more favorable to democrats.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Even more reason to rally.

[scottw]

I love when the dummycraps get their panties all in a bunch...sounds like it's full on wedgies

I heard they've tried to impeach every republican president since Eisenhower so this should not surprise anyone....