The party of voter suppression

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

not sure How he has no say in the vote count , not sure how you see he statement's as a bigger concern. than the POTUS

wdmso, are you going to say with a straight face, that mail in ballots aren’t more ripe for fraud?

i see trunks statement as a big concern, one of the worst things he’s said in the last 4 years.

but my wife voted early, and when i checked in yesterday in person, her name wasn’t crossed off. so i asked the volunteer if she was eligible to vote again, and they said yes. she didn’t, but she could have.

with this much at stake, either side is capable of kicking the ball onto the fairway.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

wdmso, are you going to say with a straight face, that mail in ballots aren’t more ripe for fraud? No they are not another statement minus supporting evidence

i see trunks statement as a big concern, one of the worst things he’s said in the last 4 years. Figures

but my wife voted early, and when i checked in yesterday in person, her name wasn’t crossed off. so i asked the volunteer if she was eligible to vote again, and they said yes. she didn’t, but she could have. With a provisional ballot

with this much at stake, either side is capable of kicking the ball onto the fairway.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Rockhound said it in another thread spot on. Stop counting everywhere , keep counting in Arizona. That sums him up completely