Sen. Warren is at it again!

[Nebe]

Let the hate fill you. I’m sure all of you guys thrive on it.

And for the mental midgets who can’t grasp this. She was probably told by her parents that a distant grandparent was an Indian. A family story that was passed down. The DNA test proves that she was correct.

Sorry. Try again ....on a new hateful subject.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by Nebe

Let the hate fill you. I’m sure all of you guys thrive on it.

And for the mental midgets who can’t grasp this. She was probably told by her parents that a distant grandparent was an Indian. A family story that was passed down. The DNA test proves that she was correct.

Sorry. Try again ....on a new hateful subject.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Darth Vader?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Nebe

Let the hate fill you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm pretty sure I have more native american "share" than spence and fauxcohontas combined.... using whatever tiny, distant trace that may or may not exist to claim some minority or person of color status is pretty shameful....she's smart enough to know that

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

I'm pretty sure I have more native american "share" than spence and fauxcohontas combined.... using whatever tiny, distant trace that may or may not exist to claim some minority or person of color status is pretty shameful....she's smart enough to know that

Funny though you can't cite any evidence she ever claimed native status with the intent to get a benefit nor can you cite any evidence she ever received any benefit.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by spence

Funny though you can't cite any evidence she ever claimed native status with the intent to get a benefit nor can you cite any evidence she ever received any benefit.

Did you need evidence to find Kavanaugh guilty Jeff? Can’t I just say it and then it is real?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Did you need evidence to find Kavanaugh guilty Jeff? Can’t I just say it and then it is real?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Testimony under sworn oath is evidence.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

Testimony under sworn oath is evidence.

Of his innocence or his guilt??? Because he swore under oath he didn't do it.

are they both evidence, or only the one you like to believe?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Of his innocence or his guilt??? Because he swore under oath he didn't do it.

are they both evidence, or only the one you like to believe?

looking forward to seeing the answer to this.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Of his innocence or his guilt??? Because he swore under oath he didn't do it.

are they both evidence, or only the one you like to believe?

I've never once said her testimony is conclusive proof. I do think his response to her accusation and the accusations in general clearly demonstrated he is unfit to serve on the bench.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Did you need evidence to find Kavanaugh guilty Jeff? Can’t I just say it and then it is real?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think they have a pretty good model called firehose of falsehood

Since his entrance into the political arena (if not before), there has been a remarkable evolution in Trump's approach to news. The President has effectively employed new dissemination channels and messages in support of his 2016 election, his agenda, his ongoing involvement in disavowing Russian collusion and various other issues, and his antagonism of allies. The Trump news model is high-volume and multichannel, and it disseminates messages without regard for the truth. It is also rapid, continuous, and repetitive, and it lacks commitment to consistency. Although these techniques run counter to the conventional wisdom for successful information campaigns, research in psychology supports many of the most successful aspects of the model. Furthermore, the very factors that make the firehose of falsehood effective also make it difficult to counter. Traditional counterpropaganda approaches will likely be inadequate in this context. More effective solutions can be found in the same psychology literature that explains the surprising success of the Trump news model and its messages.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Funny though you can't cite any evidence she ever claimed native status with the intent to get a benefit nor can you cite any evidence she ever received any benefit.

did I use the word benefit?

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by scottw

did I use the word benefit?

Spence sure does love that word "Intent"