Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The bill would have required medical care for a non-viable live birth with criminal penalties for the doctor. Full stop right there.
Jim, the laws have changed since 1977, he mom wouldn't have been able to have an abortion today. The idea that a doctor would approve an abortion of a viable late term baby over a little anxiety would likely get their license to practice revoked. This is just fear mongering.
Maybe some women don't want to carry a dead or non viable baby to term...that's their right.
Reread entire thread.
And this is why I said you don't understand much of anything in this discussion.
You don't have any empathy for the mothers obviously.
|
ah, it appears you are the one who doesn’t understand late term abortion.
the late term abortion doesn’t avoid carrying the baby to term. the baby is already at term, hence the words “ late term”. the baby is killed in the womb, then the mom gives birth to a dead baby. so again, what’s the medical benefit to the mom? her body still goes through the trauma of childbirth, just that the baby is dead.
it’s not me who doesn’t understand. the bull was about caring for
babies after they survived abortion, in other words, it was about preventing (in some cases, not all) infanticide.
you’re smug for someone who’s wrong 99 percent of the time, kind of like the previous potus. emulating your
man crush. good for you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Threaded Mode