|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
09-25-2018, 02:20 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Spence, it’s bad for the senate to bring in an expert sexual crimes prosecutor who is a female, to question both Ford and Kavanaugh? i’d think you and Ford would love that move. i doubt she wants to get questioned by a bunch of old white guys, right? why not bring in an expert who knows how to best get to the truth in these situations?
It can’t be that neither you nor Ford is interested in the truth, but rather in smear, can it?
that would explain why she hasn’t asked the Md police to investigate.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-25-2018, 02:36 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Spence, it’s bad for the senate to bring in an expert sexual crimes prosecutor who is a female, to question both Ford and Kavanaugh?
|
I've not seen anything that says the attorney is going to question both people. Regardless, you'd do this because you hope to destroy the witness, not get to the facts.
|
|
|
|
09-25-2018, 03:36 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I've not seen anything that says the attorney is going to question both people. Regardless, you'd do this because you hope to destroy the witness, not get to the facts.
|
i have seen multiple reports that the attorney would question both. she’s a prosecutor, not a defense expert. you’d only run from this, if you feared the truth. kind of like opposing drug tests.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-25-2018, 03:38 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
i have seen multiple reports that the attorney would question both. she’s a prosecutor, not a defense expert. you’d only run from this, if you feared the truth. kind of like opposing drug tests.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Why wouldn't the Senators question her themselves? I'm sure they have attorney's behind the scene writing the questions.
What are they afraid of?
|
|
|
|
09-25-2018, 09:18 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Why wouldn't the Senators question her themselves?
What are they afraid of?
|
so evil democraps can't whine that she's being bullied.....
|
|
|
|
09-26-2018, 11:17 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
so evil democraps can't whine that she's being bullied.....
|
Nothing will stop them from that whining.
I still don't see the bad idea of bringing in a subject matter expert. Well, I see the problem if this is just a smear campaign, I see no problem if the goal is justice.
|
|
|
|
09-26-2018, 01:31 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
I wonder if the democrats have reached peak crazy yet....
|
|
|
|
09-27-2018, 07:28 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
[QUOTE=Jim in CT;1151866] Spence, it’s bad for the senate to bring in an expert sexual crimes prosecutor who is a female, to question both Ford and Kavanaugh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Regardless, you'd do this because you hope to destroy the witness, not get to the facts.
|
"Rachel Mitchell, a veteran prosecutor from Arizona whose “life mission” has been to investigate sex crimes. Mitchell’s boss, Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery, praised called her a “professional, fair, objective prosecutor” who has a “caring heart” for victims.The people of America are well served with her involvement in this process,” he said.
Mitchell — a graduate of the Arizona State University law school — has worked as a prosecutor since 1993 and spent 12 years running the bureau in the division responsible for the prosecution of sex-related felonies, including adult sexual assault.
Cindi Nannetti, her former supervisor and co-counsel on high-profile cases, said: “Rachel doesn’t seek attention as a lawyer. She has excellent judgment. She demands thorough investigation by police officers. Her bottom line is justice.
“She’s super smart. I just don’t think she’ll be bullied by anyone. She just doesn’t look at anything politically.”
|
|
|
|
09-27-2018, 07:40 AM
|
#9
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,069
|
[QUOTE=scottw;1152076]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Spence, it’s bad for the senate to bring in an expert sexual crimes prosecutor who is a female, to question both Ford and Kavanaugh?
"Rachel Mitchell, a veteran prosecutor from Arizona whose “life mission” has been to investigate sex crimes. Mitchell’s boss, Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery, praised called her a “professional, fair, objective prosecutor” who has a “caring heart” for victims.The people of America are well served with her involvement in this process,” he said.
Mitchell — a graduate of the Arizona State University law school — has worked as a prosecutor since 1993 and spent 12 years running the bureau in the division responsible for the prosecution of sex-related felonies, including adult sexual assault.
Cindi Nannetti, her former supervisor and co-counsel on high-profile cases, said: “Rachel doesn’t seek attention as a lawyer. She has excellent judgment. She demands thorough investigation by police officers. Her bottom line is justice.
“She’s super smart. I just don’t think she’ll be bullied by anyone. She just doesn’t look at anything politically.”
|
Sounds familiar, pretty typical laudatory quote
“Robert Mueller is the perfect choice,” Jeffries said. “Most important is his integrity. For Bob, integrity is not merely a policy or a practice; it’s character. He is incapable of dishonesty or dissembling. Additionally, he has the skill and experience to be effective. His appointment has been universally applauded, as it should be.”
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
09-27-2018, 08:30 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
[QUOTE=Pete F.;1152077]
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
Sounds familiar, pretty typical laudatory quote
”
|
no...it sounds like exactly the opposite of what spence attempted to imply
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM.
|
| |