In case you missed it

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

I think his point was that non-LEO good guys with guns stopping violent crime doesn't have enough statistical significance to claim it's a valid strategy to inhibit violent crime.

I also don't understand how under the radical liberal anti-gun Obama freedom for carry has gone up if the call is for stricter gun control and a dismantling of the 2nd amendment.

Are you upside down on both aspects?

But a bad guy with an illegally procured gun, that goes on a rampage, has enough statistical significance to claim it's a valid strategy to inhibit violent crime?

They're both one needle in the same haystack of 333,000,000 needles.

And you can comprehend that "the call for" and "passing laws for" aren't the same thing?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device