You guys are disappointing me

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

...maybe that kid leading the repeal the 2nd amendment movement....he seems "balanced"..."Of 111 Supreme Court justices none have been children"...wassup with that?

So now your approach is to disparage kids who just suffered a school shooting? Are you OK?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

So now your approach is to disparage kids who just suffered a school shooting? Are you OK?

how did I disparage him?...I nominated him for the supreme court..and what "kids"...I mentioned 1....are you ok?...or just swinging for the nuts as usual?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

So now your approach is to disparage kids who just suffered a school shooting? Are you OK?

I'll let the kids say their peace, When David Hogg uses nothing but f-words to describe everyone who disagrees with him, he deserves a whole lot of pushback.

[scottw]

sometimes...when people want to talk or yell...you run to get them a soapbox to stand on...then just stand back and let em' go for it

was that disparaging?....maybe a little snarky...

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I'll let the kids say their peace, When David Hogg uses nothing but f-words to describe everyone who disagrees with him, he deserves a whole lot of pushback.

I think he's earned the right to drop a few f bombs. The pushback isn't because he swore in an interview, it's because some see him as a threat.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

The pushback isn't because he swore in an interview, it's because some see him as a threat.

you say the funniest things

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I think he's earned the right to drop a few f bombs. The pushback isn't because he swore in an interview, it's because some see him as a threat.

"I think he's earned the right to drop a few f bombs."

About what happened, sure. Directed at everyone who disagrees with him? It shows precisely why it's a bad idea to let traumatized children shape public policy.

"The pushback isn't because he swore in an interview, it's because some see him as a threat"

Nobody sees him as a threat, just an annoyance, a profane, vulgar annoyance. I feel horrible for him, the lefty media is using him as a sock puppet, and he's buying into it hook, line and sinker, he thinks he's Rosa Parks. When they no longer have any use for him and they cast him off, he may not handle it well. No one seems to be looking out for his long term interests.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

So now your approach is to disparage kids who just suffered a school shooting? Are you OK?

One of those kids, a quite in-you-face-girl, admitted to actively ostracizing the shooter since middle school. But it's all the gun's fault.

This is why we don't let kids, especially traumatized kids, make public policy unilaterally. She sure isn't acting as if she wants to hear that being ostracized might have contributed to this.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

One of those kids, a quite in-you-face-girl, admitted to actively ostracizing the shooter since middle school. But it's all the gun's fault.

Once again, you should read what she actually said in context instead of educating yourself from meme's.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Once again, you should read what she actually said in context instead of educating yourself from meme's.

"spencetext"

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

"spencetext"

I saw her on TV, I am responding to her words.

According to Spence, if you are critical of something a liberal said or did, you are necessarily taking it out of context.

The biggest cop -ut in the world, from people who are literally incapable of being self-critical, is that you took it out of context. It's a useless defense.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I saw her on TV, I am responding to her words.

According to Spence, if you are critical of something a liberal said or did, you are necessarily taking it out of context.

The biggest cop -ut in the world, from people who are literally incapable of being self-critical, is that you took it out of context. It's a useless defense.

Well you did, or perhaps you just don't know what ostracized means?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

perhaps you just don't know what ostracized means?

Perhaps. Or perhaps I know exactly what it means, and perhaps instead you are biologically incapable of criticizing the left about anything. Perhaps you make Sean Hannity look neutral...