|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-03-2013, 12:02 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Key word there is " kook"
It's not about the weapon
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 12:43 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
It's not about the weapon
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Then please enlighten me. If the weapon plays no role in the outcome, why did all those cops (who have standard issue handguns) run into that school with rifles? How come when I was with the USMC, I never once told my gyus to leave their rifles back at base and just bring handguns?
The kook is the biggest factor, you are correct. But please, tell me what's factually incorrect with the following sentence?
The more lethal the weapon, the more kids the kook can kill before the good guys get there.
How is that wrong?
|
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 01:09 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
[QUOTE
The kook is the biggest factor, you are correct. But please, tell me what's factually incorrect with the following sentence?
The more lethal the weapon, the more kids the kook can kill before the good guys get there.
How is that wrong?[/QUOTE]
Think suicide bomber . Your right this kook chose an assault style rifle but your premise that less kids would have died if he didn't illegally access this weapon is hypothetical
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 01:24 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
[QUOTE
The kook is the biggest factor, you are correct. But please, tell me what's factually incorrect with the following sentence?
The more lethal the weapon, the more kids the kook can kill before the good guys get there.
How is that wrong?
|
your premise that less kids would have died if he didn't illegally access this weapon is hypothetical
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device[/QUOTE]
So why did those cops storm the school with rifles instead of handguns?
Yes, I am hypothesizing. The fact that those cops entered the school with rifles instead of handguns, would seem to support my hypothesis. The cops did not know what they were facing. Yet just about every one of them chose a rifle instead of a pistol? Why?
If a rifle provides no tactical advantage over a handgun, why did they all have rifles?
|
|
|
|
01-03-2013, 06:23 PM
|
#5
|
Hardcore Equipment Tester
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Abington, MA
Posts: 6,234
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Then please enlighten me. If the weapon plays no role in the outcome, why did all those cops (who have standard issue handguns) run into that school with rifles? How come when I was with the USMC, I never once told my gyus to leave their rifles back at base and just bring handguns?
The kook is the biggest factor, you are correct. But please, tell me what's factually incorrect with the following sentence?
The more lethal the weapon, the more kids the kook can kill before the good guys get there.
How is that wrong?
|
Since 9-11 and the LA bank heist most police departments have issued patrol rifles or carbines with homeland security money so that the cops are never outgunned again. That said if you were in your house and an armed intruder broke in, with say a shotgun, you would be more comfortable going up against him with a pistol? I know I would want a semi automatic carbine made for CQB, the best chance for myself and my family to survive. This is why they went into the school with "rifles" up against a "kook" armed with pistols.
|
Bent Rods and Screaming Reels!
Spot NAZI
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.
|
| |