A Black perspective that covers it all.

[detbuch]

This is too good not to watch. A black perspective that covers all the political hot points:

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

This is too good not to watch. A black perspective that covers all the political hot points:

And your Point?

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

And your Point?

I stated it in the intro to the video.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I stated it in the intro to the video.

Are you suggesting this represents how blacks think on these topics ..or are you shocked black conservatives see things the same as white conservatives ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Are you suggesting this represents how blacks think on these topics ..or are you shocked black conservatives see things the same as white conservatives ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Again, you don't understand the meaning of the definite article "A." I said "A" black perspective, not "the" Black perspective.

I don't know why you asked If I am shocked. Where does that come from? What does that have to do with the video?

As usual, you, in one way or another, deflect from actually discussing a video that I post. I'm guessing that you dislike them and/or disagree with them. But making the video about me is evading the point of this forum--political discussion and debate. The search for truth and the back and forth discussions on points of view that can lead to some agreement on what is true and good as opposed to what is wrong and destructive.

I think that Owens and Elder are spot on in their opinions and statistics. And that they expose a connection with the Democrat party that is destructive to Blacks. I welcome you to dispute what they so eloquently say.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Again, you don't understand the meaning of the definite article "A." I said "A" black perspective, not "the" Black perspective.

I don't know why you asked If I am shocked. Where does that come from? What does that have to do with the video?

As usual, you, in one way or another, deflect from actually discussing a video that I post. I'm guessing that you dislike them and/or disagree with them. But making the video about me is evading the point of this forum--political discussion and debate. The search for truth and the back and forth discussions on points of view that can lead to some agreement on what is true and good as opposed to what is wrong and destructive.

I think that Owens and Elder are spot on in their opinions and statistics. And that they expose a connection with the Democrat party that is destructive to Blacks. I welcome you to dispute what they so eloquently say.

so in a nutshell they believe what you believe ... This post was about optics not content..

Candace owens (29) is the only person of color that Conservatives parade around. as an example as see we have black conserives (no kidding )

to bad they dont take time to read her History ... she's flip flopped more than Trump In less time




Owens was In a 2015 column that Owens wrote for the site she criticized conservative Republicans, writing about the "bat-#^&#^&#^&#^&-crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party", adding, "The good news is, they will eventually die off (peacefully in their sleep, we hope), and then we can get right on with the OBVIOUS social change that needs to happen, IMMEDIATELY.


By 2017, Owens had become known in conservative circles for her pro-Trump commentary and for criticizing liberal rhetoric regarding structural racism, systemic inequality, and identity politics


n October 2018, Owens launched the Blexit movement, a campaign to encourage African Americans to abandon the Democratic Party and register as Republicans.

[The Dad Fisherman]

With age comes wisdom

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

With age comes wisdom

wdmso still has time to age a bit more and get there. I hope.

[PaulS]

Wasn't she the person who settled a racism case for 35K and then later said the US doesn't have a problem with racism?

Is that smearing her character to ask that?

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Wasn't she the person who settled a racism case for 35K and then later said the US doesn't have a problem with racism?

Is that smearing her character to ask that?

Did she sue the entire U.S. or did she have a case against an individual?

Is that ok to clarify before we label the entire country racist?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Did she sue the entire U.S. or did she have a case against an individual?

Is that ok to clarify before we label the entire country racist?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No one has claimed the entire US is racist but for her to say there is no problem when she in fact had a problem seems a little hypocritical to me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Wasn't she the person who settled a racism case for 35K and then later said the US doesn't have a problem with racism?

Is that smearing her character to ask that?

Yes, it is a smear by the leftists because their narrative is false. They claim she said that racism is over in America. She did not say that. She said that America is not a racist country. Yes we have racists. That does not make us a racist country. Otherwise, if we accept the standard that having some racists makes a country racist, then I don't know of a country that isn't racist.

And the Owens family initial complaint was that the delay in arresting the teens was because one of them was the son of the mayor. They did not request the help of the NAACP. The NAACP saw another opportunity to show how racist America is and further the victim status of Blacks in this country, and jumped in to sue for racism. It was an NAACP maneuver, using the Owens family to implement it. But a racist country would not have allowed the suit, much less the verdict.

The left also tried destroying her by misrepresenting something she said about Hitler, portraying it as supporting him. And that support supposedly showing the true roots of why she doesn't see nationalism as the evil that the left sees it. Among other things, she has noted that when nationalism is mentioned, there is an immediate attachment of Hitler to it. Actually, she has stated that she despises Hitler. And that he was not a nationalist, but that he was more of a globalist, as shown by his desires to conquer all of Europe and Russia and make alliances with Italy and Japan and Muslim anti-Jews in the Middle East.

If you want to find a truly racist country, look to Asia, or Africa, or the Middle East. Those areas are rich in pervasive and legal racism.

Here is an article that says it better: https://www.redstate.com/diary/daven...-creates-stir/

So yes, the effort by the left is not to accurately depict who she is and what she has said or believes, but to destroy her in whatever way possible because she is a threat to their anti-American narrative.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Yes, it is a smear by the leftists because their narrative is false. They claim she said that racism is over in America. She did not say that. She said that America is not a racist country. Yes we have racists. That does not make us a racist country. Otherwise, if we accept the standard that having some racists makes a country racist, then I don't know of a country that isn't racist.

And the Owens family initial complaint was that the delay in arresting the teens was because one of them was the son of the mayor. They did not request the help of the NAACP. The NAACP saw another opportunity to show how racist America is and further the victim status of Blacks in this country, and jumped in to sue for racism. It was an NAACP maneuver, using the Owens family to implement it. But a racist country would not have allowed the suit, much less the verdict.

The left also tried destroying her by misrepresenting something she said about Hitler, portraying it as supporting him. And that support supposedly showing the true roots of why she doesn't see nationalism as the evil that the left sees it. Among other things, she has noted that when nationalism is mentioned, there is an immediate attachment of Hitler to it. Actually, she has stated that she despises Hitler. And that he was not a nationalist, but that he was more of a globalist, as shown by his desires to conquer all of Europe and Russia and make alliances with Italy and Japan and Muslim anti-Jews in the Middle East.

If you want to find a truly racist country, look to Asia, or Africa, or the Middle East. Those areas are rich in pervasive and legal racism.

Here is an article that says it better: https://www.redstate.com/diary/daven...-creates-stir/

So yes, the effort by the left is not to accurately depict who she is and what she has said or believes, but to destroy her in whatever way possible because she is a threat to their anti-American narrative.

As usual I didn't read most of your post but when I was typing this I did see you talk about anti-American of the left. If you really believe that you have more anger than I thought you do
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

No one has claimed the entire US is racist but for her to say there is no problem when she in fact had a problem seems a little hypocritical to me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I can't find where she said that there is no problem or that racism doesn't exist. I've seen leftist media implying that she said those things.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Wasn't she the person who settled a racism case for 35K and then later said the US doesn't have a problem with racism?

Is that smearing her character to ask that?

Candace Owens lives rent-free in $3,500 apartment, claims toxic mold illness, sues landlord,


But if this was AOC OMG what a different tune the usual suspects would be singing

[detbuch]

BTW. How about the other person in the video. Any leftist smears some of you want to bring up about Larry Elder?

[PaulS]

Lot of caring less yet your actions seem to suggest otherwise. Look at your posts

Doesn't Owens appear w/Alex Jones a lot? She recently said there was no such thing as Nixon's southern strategy.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Lot of caring less yet your actions seem to suggest otherwise. Look at your posts

I care about what I post. I could care less about your opinion on what you consider my anger. I could care less about what you could care less about.

Doesn't Owens appear w/Alex Jones a lot?

Is this another attempt to smear her? Guilt by association? What are the contexts and what was discussed? Oh, maybe you could care less about the details. I suppose that you think everything Jones has said is false and that all of his evil rubs off on anyone who gets next to him.

She recently said there was no such thing as Nixon's southern strategy.

There was a Southern strategy, but there was no big switch in party ideology.

[PaulS]

You could care less but you care enough to post responses - weird.

Sorry to upset you about mentioning Alex Jones. Prob. another "I could care less" but you care enough to mention him.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You could care less but you care enough to post responses - weird.

Sorry to upset you about mentioning Alex Jones. Prob. another "I could care less" but you care enough to mention him.

Now you're melting down to pure gibberish.

[PaulS]

I thought you couldn't care less. Tough to follow you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I thought you couldn't care less. Tough to follow you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I could care less that it is tough for you to follow me. It is very evident that you were not able to make your smear of Candace stick. Your only way to save face is to lead the discussion into a meaningless rabbit hole of stupid gibberish.

Apparently, you're too stupid to have a rational discussion on the topic of this thread and too stupid to "follow" that your ignorance is not worth caring about. And too stupid to understand that telling you so means that somehow I must really care that you're stupid.
Actually, it's fun to throw back your own "I could care less" bit back at you. But it does wear thin quickly. Boring.

If it's all you got, you can repeat your inability to follow, or worry about my anger, or how weird it is. Or come up with another attempt to smear Candace Owens.

But, by all means, stay away from a rational discussion of the video. I don't think you're capable of that. And you would just muck it all up and have to revert back to not caring less, or my supposed anger, or some actually new little stupid meme.

As Sea Dangles would say--carry on . . . .

[Sea Dangles]

🍷
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

You just repeatedly proved my point that you're an angry man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You just repeatedly proved my point that you're an angry man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You stupidly did exactly what I predicted. Carry on . . .

[PaulS]

Are you going to send me one of those apology PMs again?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Are you going to send me one of those apology PMs again?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Nope. You don't deserve one. But I'll congratulate you for stupid consistency if you carry on about how I'm angry.

BTW, we can carry on this nonsense and expand the growing number of views and keep hot the thread you can't refute or successfully disparage. Or until TDF mercifully shuts us down.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Or until TDF mercifully shuts us down.

Oh, please, carry on. Enjoy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Oh, please, carry on. Enjoy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's getting very boring. But what the hell . . . OK.

[PaulS]

I'm not carrying on about how angry you are you're demonstrated it in every post
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device