Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
|
The article is not related to your post to which ScottW referred.
It doesn't say that Benghazi happened as originally described. The original description involving the video is not even discussed.
It doesn't say there was NO cover-up. It says that a couple of memos were misquoted which somehow discredits the whole investigation, and disregards everything else about the incident. And the "misquotes" don't entirely change the nature of the "original" quotes. One left out mention of the State Dept. and the other was a rewrite by the CIA which left out references to al Qaeda which they had in their original quote to satisfy the sensitivities of State Dept.
It doesn't say that the ties to Al Qaeda were "fabricated" by a corrupt journalist to sell a story. It stays away from discussing ties to Al Qaeda, which subsequent stories by "reputable" journalists (including CNN
)show existed.
As Spence likes to say, this is old news.
Hybrid Mode
