|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
10-02-2017, 06:43 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
|
Ok, so you don't know what they are or how they function but you don't think people should own them? Got it,typical reactionary post. I get it , I do but hey nobody needs a vehicle that can go 80 mph too,innocent people are killed by speeders all the time...and texting and driving kills innocent people too ,so cell phones are gone too..let's just take everything. See the "slippery slope"?
Nowhere do "the forefathers" mention hunting in regard to the second amendment but they sure do mention a tyrannical government and I'll stick with the facts thanks. I won't wave any NRA card in anyone's face as long as they don't try and tell me what I should or shouldn't own. And by the way "assault rifles" are banned already. One needs a stamp approved by the ATF to own certain items.
If it makes anyone's feelings not hurt I asked all my rifles if they plan on doing anything wrong..but they just sat in my safe not talking or planning anything so we're safe.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 07:37 PM
|
#2
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,395
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysdad115
Ok, so you don't know what they are or how they function but you don't think people should own them? Got it,typical reactionary post. I get it , I do but hey nobody needs a vehicle that can go 80 mph too,innocent people are killed by speeders all the time...and texting and driving kills innocent people too ,so cell phones are gone too..let's just take everything. See the "slippery slope"?
Nowhere do "the forefathers" mention hunting in regard to the second amendment but they sure do mention a tyrannical government and I'll stick with the facts thanks. I won't wave any NRA card in anyone's face as long as they don't try and tell me what I should or shouldn't own. And by the way "assault rifles" are banned already. One needs a stamp approved by the ATF to own certain items.
If it makes anyone's feelings not hurt I asked all my rifles if they plan on doing anything wrong..but they just sat in my safe not talking or planning anything so we're safe.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Pretty sure the texting and driving kills the driver and maybe a few innocent victims and the same can be said for the truck driver who has been driving his semi for 8 hours longer then he probably should have, how does that compare in the scope of what happened in vegas? I could use that argument and go in dozen's of directions, but we weren't talking highway safety; at least I wasn't.
Of course our forefathers didn't mention hunting, but I'm pretty sure at the time those words were penned, weapons on our side, the British side or anywhere in the world; were all pretty much basic and simple fire arms.
At some point you have to take time and place into consideration and what was so right, reasonable and so necessary then as a constitutional right, I think in today's environment and pressures needs to be seasoned with some fing common sense.
Do you think those who wrote those constitutional rights giving us all the right to own those basic firearms, in order to protect your life and the lives of your family, do you think today those same people would broad brush that to include everything? I seriously doubt those same people would feel the same today, not given the environment we are all living in today.
Some of me best friends are avid hunters, I'm not advocating taking guns away, I'm just saying control what can be bought and put better vetting on who can buy.
|
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 07:44 PM
|
#3
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,349
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysdad115
Nowhere do "the forefathers" mention hunting in regard to the second amendment but they sure do mention a tyrannical government and I'll stick with the facts thanks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
You are right, no mention of hunting. It does mention a well regulated militia.
I think GS is bringing up a discussion of what well-regulated militia means. Oxford dictionary states:
well-regulated, adjective
Properly governed or directed; (now) especially strictly controlled by rules or regulations.
Origin
Late 16th century; earliest use found in Geoffrey Fenton (c1539–1608), translator and administrator in Ireland. From well + regulated.
Having a discussion of where that line is a valid discussion. You have your opinion, we have ours.
Where is the line? Grenades? Tanks? Working Howitzer in your front yard?
Since Jim CT is probably the only one here who has seen what these weapons actually do to a person, so I'll weight his opinion appropriately.
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 07:47 PM
|
#4
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,395
|
In December 2012, a gunman walked into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, and killed 20 children, six adults, and himself. Since then, there have been at least 1,518 mass shootings, with at least 1,715 people killed and 6,089 wounded.
|
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 07:54 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
In December 2012, a gunman KILLED HIS OWN MOTHER ,STOLE HER FIREARMS and walked into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, and killed 20 children, six adults, and himself. Since then, there have been at least 1,518 mass shootings, with at least 1,715 people killed and 6,089 wounded.
|
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I inserted what you guys choose to leave out.
|
Does your incessant whining make you feel better? How about you just shut the hell up and suck it up? It's a fishing forum , so please just stop.
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 07:58 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
You are right, no mention of hunting. It does mention a well regulated militia.
I think GS is bringing up a discussion of what well-regulated militia means. Oxford dictionary states:
well-regulated, adjective
Properly governed or directed; (now) especially strictly controlled by rules or regulations.
Origin
Late 16th century; earliest use found in Geoffrey Fenton (c1539–1608), translator and administrator in Ireland. From well + regulated.
Having a discussion of where that line is a valid discussion. You have your opinion, we have ours.
Where is the line? Grenades? Tanks? Working Howitzer in your front yard?
Since Jim CT is probably the only one here who has seen what these weapons actually do to a person, so I'll weight his opinion appropriately.
|
It also reads "shall not be infringed"...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Does your incessant whining make you feel better? How about you just shut the hell up and suck it up? It's a fishing forum , so please just stop.
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 08:01 PM
|
#7
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,349
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysdad115
It also reads "shall not be infringed"...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Great.
Where is the line?
Grenades?
Mines?
Anti-aircraft guns in your back yard?
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 08:06 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Great.
Where is the line?
Grenades?
Mines?
Anti-aircraft guns in your back yard?
|
Can I get those? I pass a background check every firearm purchase I make. Do you get those through the internet loophole I hear so much about? Or are those already restricted items according to ATF?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Does your incessant whining make you feel better? How about you just shut the hell up and suck it up? It's a fishing forum , so please just stop.
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 08:08 PM
|
#9
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,349
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysdad115
Can I get those? I pass a background check every firearm purchase I make. Do you get those through the internet loophole I hear so much about? Or are those already restricted items according to ATF?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So, I'm just trying to find the line. Those are illegal (obviously I picked things that were clearly illegal), and that is OK with you that those are restricted?
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 08:16 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
So, I'm just trying to find the line. Those are illegal (obviously I picked things that were clearly illegal), and that is OK with you that those are restricted?
|
Hell no!! I'd love to safely and responsibly own an anti aircraft gun or 3!! The OP was about automatic weapons, rifles easily converted etc etc...that was my reply. Personally most illegal things are the most fun..yes I've fired several automatic firearms, no it doesn't make me an expert but it made me smile and dammit I liked them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Does your incessant whining make you feel better? How about you just shut the hell up and suck it up? It's a fishing forum , so please just stop.
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 08:12 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Great.
Where is the line?
Grenades?
Mines?
Anti-aircraft guns in your back yard?
|
I think that's a great point (sincerely, no sarcasm). If you take that "shall not be infringed" literally, then any restrictions, any at all, are unconstitutional. So where's the right place to draw the line?
|
|
|
|
10-02-2017, 08:10 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysdad115
It also reads "shall not be infringed"...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Yes it does, and that's the thing. I'm not a huge fan of all these guns in the hands of people with a questionable grasp of reality. But what's scarier to me, is ignoring the parts of the constitution we don't happen to like. I'm not a conspiracy nut, but that is a slippery slope I don't feel like embarking upon.
There isn't anything even close to an easy answer. I wish there were a lot less guns. I also wish there was a bit less evil, and a bit more empathy.
Everybody here is making a lot of sense, I think...no extreme reactions one way or the other. Neither Charlton Heston nor Nancy Pelosi has the answer, I'm confident of that.
Our moral compass needs a tune up. I turned the TV off and went outside to shoot hoops with my kids.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM.
|
| |