Vegas and Automatic Weapons

[spence]

The more I read these long winded defenses of the 2nd Amendment the more I'm reminded of that old debate adage, when you're explaining you're losing.

I thought it was a very plainspoken document, easy to understand.

[ReelinRod]

Originally Posted by spence

The more I read these long winded defenses of the 2nd Amendment the more I'm reminded of that old debate adage, when you're explaining you're losing.

I thought it was a very plainspoken document, easy to understand.

Yes, easily understood and as the Federalists recognized, easily misconstructed and misrepresented.

For 66 years the "militia right" and "state's right" perversions held sway in the lower federal courts. All Heller did was re-affirm SCOTUS precedent on the individual right (on that point Heller was 9-0) and slap the lower federal courts back into line.

You still want to argue defunct and disgraced theories while complaining that the explanations of why you are wrong are too long.

It must be good to be a liberal!

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

The more I read these long winded defenses of the 2nd Amendment the more I'm reminded of that old debate adage, when you're explaining you're losing.

I thought it was a very plainspoken document, easy to understand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spence

" it's more about a lack of curiosity to understand or an inability to understand. "

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

The more I read these long winded defenses of the 2nd Amendment the more I'm reminded of that old debate adage, when you're explaining you're losing.

Well, that explains why you do the pigeon walk in your Hillary underoos after you post here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device