Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Obama's statement was in response to a question, not a prepared remark. That he left out some context is reasonable and when asked again he was more specific.
I think Obama's assertion that the bill was passed by a big majority was certainly a stretch, but his comment that the SCOTUS hasn't mucked with economic policy in the modern era does appear to be accurate from what I've read.
This blabbering on that Obama doesn't know what the Supreme Court does is pretty absurd.
-spence
|
"Obama's statement was in response to a question, not a prepared remark."
Oh, I see. So even you, his biggest fan, expect idiotic, demonstrably false jibberish to come out of his mouth when he's not reading a rehearsed speech? I keep hearing how refreshing it is to have an intellectual in the Oval Office. You can't have it both ways, Spence.
You're saying that we should all expect him to say idiotic things when he's not reading a prepared speech, and we should therefore forgive him. That's not what Obama fans did to Palin when she said atupid things.
"That he left out some context "
Spence, he said it would be "unprecedented" if the Court deemed his healthcare law illegal. PLEASE PUT THAT IN ANY CONTEXT YOU WANT. That answer would get a rishly deserved "F" in any 7th grade civics class. This is what Harvard Law School produces? He's completely, 100% ignorant about the core function of one-third of our federal government?
"This blabbering on that Obama doesn't know what the Supreme Court does is pretty absurd"
No. What's absurd is that he doesn't know what the Suprene Court does. Spence, the word "unprecedented" is not ambiguous, it's not open for interpretation. I'm not spinning anything, I'm not putting words in his mouth, I'm not taking anything out of context. He used the word "unprecedented". I'm sorry your hero put his foot in his mouth on a big stage. Don't take your frustration out on me, it's not my fault that this emperor has no clothes.
"his comment that the SCOTUS hasn't mucked with economic policy in the modern era does appear to be accurate from what I've read."
But that's not what he said. Read the quote, The word "economics" appears nowhere. You are now making things up to make him look less idiotic.
""I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,"
Where is Obama saying that what he's talking about is economic policy? Where, exactly? Spence, point that out for me please?
Forget about what you think he meant. Look at what he said. Liberals had no problem holding Palin accountable for what she said, so let's hold Obama to the same standard, unless that's unfair for some reason?
Not a good day for you Spence, not a good day. Just once, you could have said "jeez, i can't imagine what he was thinking when he said that, that's a stupid thing to say".
Hybrid Mode
