Trump’s losing it

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Stamp your feet a little harder and complain why I'm not answering your question. I didn't ask anything about the emails. You're being delusional.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you asked what she did that was unethical. you asked that in the context of the emails.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

NEW: Attorney General William Barr has held private meetings overseas with foreign intelligence officials, including in the U.K. and Italy, seeking their help in investigation of the Russia investigation.

Was this illegal or inappropriate?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Yes I do.

I never said anything about one question ruining his chances,you did. I said Sanders believes the nomination was rigged. That is why he did not endorse her. She accepted help and that is an uneven playing field.

I will ask again because you seem chatty. Do you believe that was fair play?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Firstly thank you for admitting your hypocrite. You might want to be Petty and point out the spelling in that sentence. I asked what did hillary do that was unethical because Jim made that statement. You said screwing over Bernie to start, not that Bernie said it. So I will ask again what exactly did Hillary do that was unethical bc I really don't know what you guys are talking about. Are you talking about receiving a question because that's not her being unethical that's Donna brazile being unethical.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

I will answer again. She accepted help that gave her an UNFAIR advantage.
Would you do the same PaulS, surely you were raised better than that.
When are you going to answer my question?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

I will answer again. She accepted help that gave her an UNFAIR advantage.
Would you do the same PaulS, surely you were raised better than that.
When are you going to answer my question?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he doesn’t have to
answer, and you’re clearly very angry.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Putin’s goals are to get out from under 2 sets of sanctions: one based on messing with our 2016 election, one on invading Ukraine. Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukraine into settling with Russia & to “prove” Russia didn’t mess with us in 2016 make sense as ways to please Putin. QED
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Was this illegal or inappropriate?

Conservatives pretended to be furious that Bill Clinton said hi to Loretta Lynch on a tarmac. Now imagine she'd traversed the globe trying to substantiate anti-Romney smears. That these are different abuses of the office doesn't make this proper or "reasonable."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

NEW: President Trump just told the White House press pool that he is actively "trying to find out" who the whistleblower is.

The President is violating the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

New Quinnipiac poll: Do you think President Trump should be impeached and removed from office?

NOW
Yes 47%
No 47%

LAST WEEK
Yes 37%
No 57%
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Conservatives pretended to be furious that Bill Clinton said hi to Loretta Lynch on a tarmac. Now imagine she'd traversed the globe trying to substantiate anti-Romney smears. That these are different abuses of the office doesn't make this proper or "reasonable."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you know what was said on the plane? wow...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

New Quinnipiac poll: Do you think President Trump should be impeached and removed from office?

NOW
Yes 47%
No 47%

LAST WEEK
Yes 37%
No 57%
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

let’s skip the election and just coronate liz warren.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

I will answer again. She accepted help that gave her an UNFAIR advantage.
Would you do the same PaulS, surely you were raised better than that.
When are you going to answer my question?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What help? Being given a question ahead of time and that she would have been prepared for anyways? Didn't you just say that you had no problem with Rodger Ailes giving Trump questions ahead of time?. How is that not the same?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

he doesn’t have to
answer, and you’re clearly very angry.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

aren't you the one who said something about someone here masturbating on a photo of Obama? What shows less class and more anger then that?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

What help? Being given a question ahead of time and that she would have been prepared for anyways? Didn't you just say that you had no problem with Rodger Ailes giving Trump ahead of time?. How is that not the same?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you don’t think that giving ( and receiving) a debate question ahead of time that’s not given to
the other candidate, isn’t helping the person who received the question.

Gotcha.

How about the use of superdelegates, where bernie could
win a state but fall behind in the delegate count?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

let’s skip the election and just coronate liz warren.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Unlike Trump, I think she would refuse the coronation
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you asked what she did that was unethical. you asked that in the context of the emails.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I never asked anything in the context of emails. I said simply what exactly did she do that was unethical and no one has answered the question. I think SD is talking about receiving a question for the debate ahead of time but he hasn't clearly articulated that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

I think the Trumplicans have stepped thru a space time continuum and gone back to 2016
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

To contradict and undermine the entire IC of the United States, to exonerate Russia.
This is the foreign policy they’re advancing.
Russia’s foreign policy.

Putin’s Puppet
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you don’t think that giving ( and receiving) a debate question ahead of time that’s not given to
the other candidate, isn’t helping the person who received the question.

Gotcha.

How about the use of superdelegates, where bernie could
win a state but fall behind in the delegate count?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it certainly is helpful to the person receiving the question but it is not unethical on Hillary's part someone comes up to her and said hey here's what they're going to ask you tomorrow. It's unethical for Donna brazile to do that. If Hillary approached brazile and asked for the questions that would be unethical but that clearly did not happen. But no one seems to have a problem that Trump was given questions by Rodger Ailes. And Hillary had no part in the super delegates so how is that her being unethical?

Gotcha- what a clown.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Realize some people would call it a "nothing burger" if Trump turned out to be a cannibalistic serial killer and was caught.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

What help? Being given a question ahead of time and that she would have been prepared for anyways? Didn't you just say that you had no problem with Rodger Ailes giving Trump questions ahead of time?. How is that not the same?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Please don’t breed, Paul.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Conservatives pretended to be furious that Bill Clinton said hi to Loretta Lynch on a tarmac. Now imagine she'd traversed the globe trying to substantiate anti-Romney smears. That these are different abuses of the office doesn't make this proper or "reasonable."

Since you didn't, or couldn't, answer the question, I'll do it for you. No, it was not illegal or inappropriate for Attorney General William Barr to have private meetings overseas with foreign intelligence officials, including in the U.K. and Italy, seeking their help in investigation of the current ongoing Russia investigation.

The U.S. has a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with both Italy and the U.K. Asking for assistance in the Russia investigation if those countries have information that can be of help is not only legal and appropriate and even reasonable, but a dereliction if the assistance was not asked.

This is in no way comparable to Lorreta Lynch tarmac issue, nor at all like seeking smears, especially if not related to an ongoing criminal investigation, and it certainly was not an abuse of office.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Please don’t breed, Paul.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Ok hypocrite.

It is no wonder why someone on here previously called you a vile person.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Since you didn't, or couldn't, answer the question, I'll do it for you. No, it was not illegal or inappropriate for Attorney General William Barr to have private meetings overseas with foreign intelligence officials, including in the U.K. and Italy, seeking their help in investigation of the current ongoing Russia investigation.

The U.S. has a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with both Italy and the U.K. Asking for assistance in the Russia investigation if those countries have information that can be of help is not only legal and appropriate and even reasonable, but a dereliction if the assistance was not asked.

This is in no way comparable to Lorreta Lynch tarmac issue, nor at all like seeking smears, especially if not related to an ongoing criminal investigation, and it certainly was not an abuse of office.

Putin’s goals are to get out from under 2 sets of sanctions: one based on messing with our 2016 election, one on invading Ukraine. Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukraine into settling with Russia & to “prove” Russia didn’t mess with us in 2016 make sense as ways to please Putin.

To contradict and undermine the entire IC of the United States, to exonerate Russia.
This is the foreign policy they’re advancing.
Russia’s foreign policy.

Putin’s Puppet

So ironic that a supposed nationalist like Trump isn't trusting his own citizens but is actively seeking international assistance to support his failing presidency & re-election chances.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Flashback: May 1.

Harris: Has the president or anyone at the W.H. ever asked or suggested that you open an investigation of anyone?
Barr: Um.
...
Harris: Seems you'd remember something like that and be able to tell us.
Barr: Yeah, but I'm trying to grapple with the word suggest.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Putin’s goals are to get out from under 2 sets of sanctions: one based on messing with our 2016 election, one on invading Ukraine. Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukraine into settling with Russia & to “prove” Russia didn’t mess with us in 2016 make sense as ways to please Putin.

To contradict and undermine the entire IC of the United States, to exonerate Russia.
This is the foreign policy they’re advancing.
Russia’s foreign policy.

Putin’s Puppet

You keep doing this kind of chit. My post to which you responded here was:
Originally Posted by detbuch
"Since you didn't, or couldn't, answer the question, I'll do it for you. No, it was not illegal or inappropriate for Attorney General William Barr to have private meetings overseas with foreign intelligence officials, including in the U.K. and Italy, seeking their help in investigation of the current ongoing Russia investigation.

"The U.S. has a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with both Italy and the U.K. Asking for assistance in the Russia investigation if those countries have information that can be of help is not only legal and appropriate and even reasonable, but a dereliction if the assistance was not asked.

"This is in no way comparable to Lorreta Lynch tarmac issue, nor at all like seeking smears, especially if not related to an ongoing criminal investigation, and it certainly was not an abuse of office."

Your reply here HAS ABSOLUTELY NO COHERENT CONNECTION TO MY POST. You do this a lot. Instead of responding to a post, you just go off on more of your obsessive conjectures about Trump bad, or Trump Putin's Puppet.

It's really not worth responding to you. You just use it as a platform to keep ranting and making unsubstantiated claims rather than maintaining a rational discussion.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

So ironic that a supposed nationalist like Trump isn't trusting his own citizens but is actively seeking international assistance to support his failing presidency & re-election chances.

This add on was not part of your original reply to my post. It is just as ignorant as that reply. He is not seeking international assistance because he doesn't trust his own citizens--HIS OWN CITIZEN, whom you mentioned as the one seeking assistance, is doing the investigation!!

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

This add on was not part of your original reply to my post. It is just as ignorant as that reply. He is not seeking international assistance because he doesn't trust his own citizens--HIS OWN CITIZEN, whom you mentioned as the one seeking assistance, is doing the investigation!!

Reminder: To this day, the Trump campaign can’t explain: 1) Why they had so many Russian contacts; 2) why they were glad to meet them; 3) why they never called the FBI; and 4) why they lied about it every time.

Their answer is to try to blame the FBI for ever asking about it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

For Crimin’ Out Loud
Omg they are trying to track down a super secret plot from the time of Da Vinci and Michelangelo to work w Joe Biden to frame the 45th US President and they will threaten to remain in beautiful Italy unless the Italian Govt and Vatican turn over their files.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I never asked anything in the context of emails. I said simply what exactly did she do that was unethical and no one has answered the question. I think SD is talking about receiving a question for the debate ahead of time but he hasn't clearly articulated that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ok paul, this is surreal.

i said the emails revealed that she acted unethically.

you then immediately asked me to specify what she did that was unethical.

but you weren’t referring to the emails in any way.

i gotta go, i’m due back on the planet earth.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device