This is Racism

[RIJIMMY]

can you imagine if this was a purely white station? Oh wait, we dont have purely white stations!

Thoughts? To me, this is 100% racist. Covering news based on the color of someone's skin. I guess they dont believe African American's need to hear both sides? Know it or not, the Arfican American media and church is doing everything in its power to stop Obama from becoming president. Maybe because it will put them out of business?

NEW YORK (AP) -- TV One, the cable network aimed at African-American viewers, will cover Barack Obama's nominating convention but is ignoring John McCain's.


TV One will provide coverage of Barack Obama's nominating convention August 25-28.

The network is telecasting live, prime-time coverage of the Democratic convention in Denver August 25-28, followed by "TV One Live: DNC Afterparty," with political and social commentary from panelists.

TV One is available in 43.7 million households, or about 40 percent of the nation's TV homes.

Obama's nomination as the first black to be a major party presidential nominee is an historic event for African-Americans, so it's important for the network to be there, said Johnathan Rodgers, the network's president and CEO.

"While viewers can get coverage of the convention from any number of networks, we plan to cover the convention from a uniquely African American perspective," he said.

[likwid]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

can you imagine if this was a purely white station? Oh wait, we dont have purely white stations!

OLN.

[spence]

It's not racist, and unless they're taking public funding I don't have a problem with it, assuming it's not in violation of some "equal time" provision for non-public media.

By covering Obama only, they're not implying that he's superior to McCain because of his color, or that they even hate John McCain because he's white.

It's a matter of interest and perhaps more importantly, market analysis.

-spence

[EarnedStripes44]

Originally Posted by spence

It's not racist, and unless they're taking public funding I don't have a problem with it, assuming it's not in violation of some "equal time" provision for non-public media.

By covering Obama only, they're not implying that he's superior to McCain because of his color, or that they even hate John McCain because he's white.

It's a matter of interest and perhaps more importantly, market analysis.

-spence

The most logical post on this thread

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by likwid

OLN.

[RIJIMMY]

the reason they are not covering McCain?
becasue he is white.

Decisions based on the color of skin - racism.
My interpretation of this? Obama is black americas candidate, McCain is white americas, if McCain wins - it will be the whites who won. More bitterness, more division but yet NONE of it will be due to any actions by white people, yet they'll be blamed.

[spence]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

Decisions based on the color of skin - racism.

So when a black woman walks up to the cosmetics counter and they pull out the tray of brown makeup they're being racist? That's silly.

There really has to be a negative connotation for it to be racist, it's not so literal.

In this specific case the network isn't implying anything negative about McCain, but rather that Obama's candidacy is quite historic and of special interest to a certain community.

My interpretation of this? Obama is black americas candidate, McCain is white americas, if McCain wins - it will be the whites who won. More bitterness, more division but yet NONE of it will be due to any actions by white people, yet they'll be blamed.

Obama has a lot of white support and many independent voters (I'm obviously not including people like Buttman or whatever his name is) don't give a whip about his color. Sure you'll get the camera darlings claiming it was a con job, but the simple fact that Obama was running for president will do more to lessen divisions than anything else.

You're engaging in "Limbaugh Thought." Try to predict the worst in people so when it happens, no matter how small the sample, you can claim you were right all along.

You know, I really don't understand all this white uproar over a black double standard. Guess what?

There is a double standard!!!

One hundred and forty five years ago this country still had black people as slaves. Up until the 1960's we still had segregation in this country!

Granted, it's on a spectrum and we're heading in the right direction as is evident by the Obama campaign. But this whole "what if a white person said that" mantra is simply not reality.

-spence

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by spence

You're engaging in "Limbaugh Thought." Try to predict the worst in people so when it happens, no matter how small the sample, you can claim you were right all along.

-spence

Im engaging in RIJimmy thought and by the way...remember OJ Simpson?

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

There really has to be a negative connotation for it to be racist, it's not so literal.

Not necassarily, I think if you have preconceived ideas about someone based on the color of their skin you are being racist.

Once you put a negative connotation with it then you are being a racial bigot.

I joke around about the sexist thing the same way, if someone assumes that my wife does something because she's the woman I always call them on it...

Say you go to a cookout at a new neighbors house.....The neighbor's wife comes up to you and says "Tell your wife that the Souffle she made was just divine"

And you say "Well, actually I made it" and she says "Really...I just assumed...."

Isn't that her being sexist, she assumed that it was the woman that did the cooking.....and I'd bet you'd be a little put off about it....even though she didn't mean anything by it.

just food for thought....plus I'm bored

[Rockport24]

even so, it's still not racist to only cover Obama's campaign, it's a black station for cryin' out loud!

By that token, you're saying that the whole station is racist to begin with (as others have said). Why doesn't BET play country music??? Why doesn't lifetime play Segal movies?? Are they are prejudice too? I mean really, are you sitting there watching TV One, pissed off because you want to get the African American community's take on McCain?

[EarnedStripes44]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Not necassarily, I think if you have preconceived ideas about someone based on the color of their skin you are being racist.

Once you put a negative connotation with it then you are being a racial bigot.

I joke around about the sexist thing the same way, if someone assumes that my wife does something because she's the woman I always call them on it...

Say you go to a cookout at a new neighbors house.....The neighbor's wife comes up to you and says "Tell your wife that the Souffle she made was just divine"



And you say "Well, actually I made it" and she says "Really...I just assumed...."

Isn't that her being sexist, she assumed that it was the woman that did the cooking.....and I'd bet you'd be a little put off about it....even though she didn't mean anything by it.

just food for thought....plus I'm bored

Racism concerns superiority vs. inferiority sentiment filtered through the looking glass of power (social power, economic power, etc.). I think what you mean here is prejudiced. Prejudice involves the preconceived notions regardless of power structure or social arrangements. To say "I just dont like him because he is black" could be construed as prejudices, but to call someone a n***** would be racist. The two may seem like they are the same, but I assure you there are different implications with the two scenarios.

[spence]

Originally Posted by EarnedStripes44

Racism concerns superiority vs. inferiority sentiment filtered through the looking glass of power (social power, economic power, etc.). I think what you mean here is prejudiced. Prejudice involves the preconceived notions regardless of power structure or social arrangements. To say "I just dont like him because he is black" could be construed as prejudices, but to call someone a n***** would be racist. The two may seem like they are the same, but I assure you there are different implications with the two scenarios.

I was going to make a similar statement regarding prejudice, the key being that the TDF souffle scenario would be more sexist if the offending person really believed that woman were better cooks simply because men can't cook. This is different that making the same statement because they assumed the woman typically did the cooking.

But remember, this all falls on a spectrum, there are few absolutes.

-spence

[FishermanTim]

My main and ONLY concern with either candidate is how they stand on the IMPORTANT issues and that they have the experience to run our country.
Would you want a fresh-out-of-med school surgeon performing your open-heart surgery, or an experienced surgeon with years of knowledge? Would you bring your boat to a mechanic that just finished trade school, or one that has worked on boats for years?

It shouldn't have ANYTHING to do with race, but this years' election is going to be one heck of a circus (no angry PM's from the peanut gallery) and it all started during the primaries.

As I've told my friends, relatives and co-workers: I don't care who are president is, as long as they have experience in politics, and have some level of intergity. I want a president we can be proud of, not an embarrassment who doesn't know his left from right, or can't keep his willie in his trousers.

All I can hope for is that whomever wins, will not sell the country out from under us. Amen.

[The Dad Fisherman]

That makes Lifetime Network Sexist

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

That makes Lifetime Network Sexist

only if it chose to only air the Hillary Clinton nomination

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY

only if it chose to only air the Hillary Clinton nomination

But it bills itself as "Television...for Women"

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

But it bills itself as "Television...for Women"

exactly - so women should only vote for another women? African Americans should only vote for another African American?

Americans vote for a president, and that president serves all americans regardless of religion, race, gender. What does the color of his skin have to do with it?

[RIJIMMY]

i agree DF

I bet Spence's neighbors never doubt who made the souffle!

[EarnedStripes44]

If Obama is elected, it will be the first time that a majority "white" country has elected a "minority" president. You should not be afraid, for this will illuminate to the world america's capacity to truly reinvent itself as a pioneering democracy as she has done time and time again. You pubes should not worry, the world will not end, regardless of who is elected, but Obama is more qualified than McCain even if they are both liars & flip floppers. McCain is a bellicose thug compared to Obama. War should be fought as a last resort. The best winning strategy over adversaries when approaching war is to achieve victory before blood is spilled.

[EarnedStripes44]

I guess you dont much like the spanish channel either. Sabado Gigante was a great show

[BlackBeard]

[UserRemoved1]

THIS is racism.

http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archiv...ck_hole_a.html

[smokefish]

80% of network television is WET. Just because someone would like to watch a television station that does not attempt to exploit every stereotype about their culture doesn't mean it's racist or prejudice.