Drip.....Drip.....Drip...some more

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Agolf tweets and he's projecting again........

When I terminated John Kelly, which I couldn’t do fast enough, he knew full well that he was way over his head. Being Chief of Staff just wasn’t for him. He came in with a bang, went out with a whimper, but like so many X’s, he misses the action & just can’t keep his mouth shut,.
....which he actually has a military and legal obligation to do. His incredible wife, Karen, who I have a lot of respect for, once pulled me aside & said strongly that “John respects you greatly. When we are no longer here, he will only speak well of you.” Wrong!

Agolf is draining the swamp drip by drip by drip . . .

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Agolf is draining the swamp drip by drip by drip . . .

He fired all the smart people.
He surrounded himself with bootlickers.
Put sticky fingered family members and cronies in charge of things.
Grew a devoted,loud following.
Derided experience and talent.
Called failures success and when that stopped working,blamed someone else.

That's a Venezuelan's description of Chavez and they know about losing a democracy, albeit not a perfect one.

But it doesn't matter if a corrupt man in power claims to be left or right, masters of populism like Chavez and Agolf Twitler work the same.

Find a wound common to many, find someone to blame for it, and make up a good story to tell. Mix it all together. Tell the wounded you know how they feel. That you found the bad guys. Label them: the minorities, the politicians, the businessmen. Caricature them. As vermin, evil masterminds, haters and losers, you name it. Then paint yourself as the savior. Capture the people’s imagination. Forget about policies and plans, just enrapture them with a tale. One that starts with anger and ends in vengeance. A vengeance they can participate in.

That’s how it becomes a movement. There’s something soothing in all that anger. Populism is built on the irresistible allure of simplicity. The narcotic of the simple answer to an intractable question. The problem is now made simple.

And here we are with the "Chosen One"

Just think Agolf now says that almost all of his most prominent hires were colossal mistakes. What does that say about him?

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

He fired all the smart people.
He surrounded himself with bootlickers.
Put sticky fingered family members and cronies in charge of things.
Grew a devoted,loud following.
Derided experience and talent.
Called failures success and when that stopped working,blamed someone else.

That's a Venezuelan's description of Chavez and they know about losing a democracy, albeit not a perfect one.

But it doesn't matter if a corrupt man in power claims to be left or right, masters of populism like Chavez and Agolf Twitler work the same.

Find a wound common to many, find someone to blame for it, and make up a good story to tell. Mix it all together. Tell the wounded you know how they feel. That you found the bad guys. Label them: the minorities, the politicians, the businessmen. Caricature them. As vermin, evil masterminds, haters and losers, you name it. Then paint yourself as the savior. Capture the people’s imagination. Forget about policies and plans, just enrapture them with a tale. One that starts with anger and ends in vengeance. A vengeance they can participate in.

That’s how it becomes a movement. There’s something soothing in all that anger. Populism is built on the irresistible allure of simplicity. The narcotic of the simple answer to an intractable question. The problem is now made simple.

And here we are with the "Chosen One"

Just think Agolf now says that almost all of his most prominent hires were colossal mistakes. What does that say about him?

I'm gonna do a Spence--everything you said is wrong.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I'm gonna do a Spence--everything you said is wrong.

If only it was

But when I say it is also true about the other populist who wants to be President, you would cheer.

I assume you can figure out who that is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

If only it was

But when I say it is also true about the other populist who wants to be President, you would cheer.

I assume you can figure out who that is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Making an assumption on a false premise would be more your style.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I'm gonna do a Spence--everything you said is wrong.

Originally Posted by detbuch

Making an assumption on a false premise would be more your style.

OK

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

OK

I agree that making an assumption based on a Spencist trick would be more like your style than mine . . . but it was light-hearted sarcasm, and a ploy I use now and then to make a point while enjoying the Spencian benefit of not having to strain myself.