Brussels

[buckman]

Originally Posted by Nebe

I can't believe I am going to say this and I don't agree with it but you will probably see internment camps in the future followed by massive deportations once the Syrian conflict settles down.

Key word here is probably which is a little more than might but a lot less than definite.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Never happen....we can't even have a Gitmo
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by buckman

Never happen....we can't even have a Gitmo
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Duck falls from the ceiling

Actually, I am going to correct you, we will have Gitmo as long as it is necessary, we will hear the same government that uses it speak against it, and when that administration has gotten its usefulness from it, they will remove it at the last minute, and its utility, to the next administration.

If he closed it in his first couple years that is one thing, but if Obama waits until the last minute, that is just fraud.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Duck falls from the ceiling

Actually, I am going to correct you, we will have Gitmo as long as it is necessary, we will hear the same government that uses it speak against it, and when that administration has gotten its usefulness from it, they will remove it at the last minute, and its utility, to the next administration.

If he closed it in his first couple years that is one thing, but if Obama waits until the last minute, that is just fraud.

True
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

Never happen....we can't even have a Gitmo
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Reminiscing about those better days?

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

Reminiscing about those better days?

Have some of those released returned to become a threat ? Yes or no ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

Have some of those released returned to become a threat ? Yes or no ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Right, because detaining and torturing so many was good PR.

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by spence

Right, because detaining and torturing so many was good PR.

What would you have done with them?

[Nebe]

Originally Posted by JohnR

What would you have done with them?

Gas em.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by JohnR

What would you have done with them?

They could have done more to address the issue in country. So many detainees were just rounded up and had no substantial connection to terrorism. Sort this out locally and you're going to get better intel from a more cooperative population. Get the number down to the few dozen that are a really connected to 9/11...why we went there to begin with and the situation is totally different.

Of course this would have taken more time and Bush Co. had other plans.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

They could have done more to address the issue in country. So many detainees were just rounded up and had no substantial connection to terrorism. Sort this out locally and you're going to get better intel from a more cooperative population. Get the number down to the few dozen that are a really connected to 9/11...why we went there to begin with and the situation is totally different.

Of course this would have taken more time and Bush Co. had other plans.

You need to get some reality into your thought process .
Not to be a pest , but since you fancy yourself a Gitmo psychologist could you answer my question from before ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

Right, because detaining and torturing so many was good PR.

Is that what this is about ?
Answer the original question please !

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device