Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home Register FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-12-2018, 08:38 AM   #1
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,942
Blog Entries: 1
NATO

Generally mixed on this. Trump is doing a good job to eff up a situation that both needs more stability, and needs more accountability by its member states. I really wish we had a better understanding on how beholden to VVP he is.

T has been pretty hard on NATO but in the big picture he is not wrong - though the delivery sucks in Trump fashion.

He is basically stating that NATO member nations should be paying their fair share of their own defense (absolutely correct) and instead are relying, at our expense, the USA to bail them out if the sh!t hits the fan.

Only a handful (4?) of NATO members are actually meeting the 2% GDP baseline. Germany is the most guilty as they are a little over 1% (1.1%) yet have one of the strongest economies in the world. They are also the most resistant to growth. German tanks now cannot fight, their planes not fly, and their ships not sail.

Promising to meet 2% by 2025 is a chuckle. This was always the unofficial baseline and dipped below that in the mid 90s. At the height of the Cold War the percentages were 3-4% of GDP spending to hopefully hold the Fulda Gap. The repeated hounding by the US for member nations to pull their weight is not new.

We do need a strong NATO but we also need NATO members to do their fair share and few of them are, particularly those with the means.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 09:17 AM   #2
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
Generally mixed on this. Trump is doing a good job to eff up a situation that both needs more stability, and needs more accountability by its member states. I really wish we had a better understanding on how beholden to VVP he is.

T has been pretty hard on NATO but in the big picture he is not wrong - though the delivery sucks in Trump fashion.

He is basically stating that NATO member nations should be paying their fair share of their own defense (absolutely correct) and instead are relying, at our expense, the USA to bail them out if the sh!t hits the fan.

Only a handful (4?) of NATO members are actually meeting the 2% GDP baseline. Germany is the most guilty as they are a little over 1% (1.1%) yet have one of the strongest economies in the world. They are also the most resistant to growth. German tanks now cannot fight, their planes not fly, and their ships not sail.

Promising to meet 2% by 2025 is a chuckle. This was always the unofficial baseline and dipped below that in the mid 90s. At the height of the Cold War the percentages were 3-4% of GDP spending to hopefully hold the Fulda Gap. The repeated hounding by the US for member nations to pull their weight is not new.

We do need a strong NATO but we also need NATO members to do their fair share and few of them are, particularly those with the means.
The lack of serious effort to provide for their own defense may be an indication that they are not really worried about Russia. Maybe the next step is to actually engage Russia economically. Perhaps, good relations are better than defensive standoffs.

Europe has not yet been able to solidify a governmental unity. The EU is now as much a threat to its member states as it is a comfort. Eastern Europe wanted into membership as a protection against Russia. But it has a long memory of Western Europe dominating and pillaging it as it has of Russia doing it. And the Eastern Europeans didn't exactly get along with each other.

The European cultural divide may be stronger than any desire for unity. Everyone is a member of the UN. But there is no overall unity.

The progressive desire has long been for a unified world. Russia and China would be a huge portion of that world. To be unified requires satisfying self interests. If that is to be achieved, everyone's interests must be satisfied.

What would convince Russia and China and the West to harmoniously join in that One World? War or Trade?

As an aside, Trump asking NATO members to pay their share is referred to as "attacking" NATO. That seems, to me, like saying that parents attack their children when they scold them for misbehaving.
detbuch is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 09:49 AM   #3
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,067
How much is enough military spending?
Total military spending in the world is more than $200 per person
We spend more than $1800 per person

Total military spending hit a new high in 2017, at $1.7 trillion—an increase of 1.1 percent on 2016. According to Jan Eliasson, Chair of the SIPRI Governing Board, “Continuing high world military expenditure is a cause for serious concern. It undermines the search for peaceful solutions to conflicts around the world.”

Perceived Russian aggression likely drove higher spending in NATO nations, especially the 12 percent increase among Central European countries. Total NATO spending in 2017 was $900 billion, accounting for 52 percent of all global spending.

Russia has now fallen to fourth in global military spending, leapfrogged by an increasingly outward-looking Saudi Arabia. The kingdom increased expenditure by 9.2 per cent last year, reaching a total of $69.4 billion.

The U.S. retains the top spot by a significant distance at $610 billion, and accounts for 35 percent of all global military expenditure—more than the next seven highest-spending nations combined. America’s defense budget stayed largely static in 2016 and 2017, but is expected to jump in 2018 as President Donald Trump’s new budget plan goes into force.

Second-place China has continued to up its military investment. Beijing’s expenditure of $228 billion represented 13 percent of total world spending, up from 5.8 percent in 2008. China is currently pursuing a comprehensive modernization of its forces as it seeks to establish itself as a top-tier global power capable of force projection. This in itself has encouraged higher spending by its Asian rivals.

Unsurprisingly, seven of the 10 countries bearing the highest military burden are located in the ever-tense Middle East. Oman was the highest at 12 percent of GDP, Saudi Arabia 10 percent, Kuwait 5.8 percent, Jordan 4.8 percent, Israel 4.7 percent, Lebanon 4.5 percent and Bahrain 4.1 percent.

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 09:55 AM   #4
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,942
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
How much is enough military spending?
Total military spending in the world is more than $200 per person
We spend more than $1800 per person

Total military spending hit a new high in 2017, at $1.7 trillion—an increase of 1.1 percent on 2016. According to Jan Eliasson, Chair of the SIPRI Governing Board, “Continuing high world military expenditure is a cause for serious concern. It undermines the search for peaceful solutions to conflicts around the world.”

Perceived Russian aggression likely drove higher spending in NATO nations, especially the 12 percent increase among Central European countries. Total NATO spending in 2017 was $900 billion, accounting for 52 percent of all global spending.

Russia has now fallen to fourth in global military spending, leapfrogged by an increasingly outward-looking Saudi Arabia. The kingdom increased expenditure by 9.2 per cent last year, reaching a total of $69.4 billion.

The U.S. retains the top spot by a significant distance at $610 billion, and accounts for 35 percent of all global military expenditure—more than the next seven highest-spending nations combined. America’s defense budget stayed largely static in 2016 and 2017, but is expected to jump in 2018 as President Donald Trump’s new budget plan goes into force.

Second-place China has continued to up its military investment. Beijing’s expenditure of $228 billion represented 13 percent of total world spending, up from 5.8 percent in 2008. China is currently pursuing a comprehensive modernization of its forces as it seeks to establish itself as a top-tier global power capable of force projection. This in itself has encouraged higher spending by its Asian rivals.

Unsurprisingly, seven of the 10 countries bearing the highest military burden are located in the ever-tense Middle East. Oman was the highest at 12 percent of GDP, Saudi Arabia 10 percent, Kuwait 5.8 percent, Jordan 4.8 percent, Israel 4.7 percent, Lebanon 4.5 percent and Bahrain 4.1 percent.
How much is the cost of Global Peace? Yes there have been wars and yes there have been far, far too many dead. Terrible costs in both blood and treasure.

But there has not been a global Hot War in nearly 80 years because of this nation. Yes there have been some spectacular eff ups along the way but no other country has done more to maker the peace than the one with the largest mil budget.

Now with that said, our budget is probably least efficient because we spend more personnel cost than anyone (ohh, and stupid / broken procurement).

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:01 PM   #5
Fishpart
Keep The Change
iTrader: (0)
 
Fishpart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Road to Serfdom
Posts: 3,275
My guess is the Germans don't see a need to spend because now there is a much wider buffer between them and the Russians. I guess their position is that if and when the Russians actually make it to the German border they will be pretty tired of fighting their way across the former Soviet Republics who will likely put up some serious resistance.

“It’s not up to the courts to invent new minorities that get special protections,” Antonin Scalia
Fishpart is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:12 PM   #6
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,067
Others might have a different viewpoint of war
In WW2 of the more than 60 million people who died in the war
20 million russians died
5 million germans died
less than half a million Americans died

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:19 PM   #7
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,942
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishpart View Post
My guess is the Germans don't see a need to spend because now there is a much wider buffer between them and the Russians. I guess their position is that if and when the Russians actually make it to the German border they will be pretty tired of fighting their way across the former Soviet Republics who will likely put up some serious resistance.

Oh soooooo absolutely agree, but that is not supporting NATO.

Eastern German border is only 350 miles from Belarus which is really the westernmost extent of RUS army. 250 miles from the Sulwaki Gap (roughly analogous to the Fulda Gap of yesteryear). 600 from Russia proper (KGrad being a problem but not the main problem). So while the likelihood of something kicking off isn't high, it may be nearing as high as in the early 80s - which is significantly worse than 15 years ago.

Interesting Fun Fact, Poland has more operational German tanks than Germany - that is where we are. That is one example of the problem NATO has at the moment.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:21 PM   #8
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,942
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
Others might have a different viewpoint of war
In WW2 of the more than 60 million people who died in the war
20 million russians died
5 million germans died
less than half a million Americans died
Absolutely, war is hell and should be avoided as much as absolutely possible. There has also not been a global, industrial scale hot war in 70+ years.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:51 PM   #9
The Dad Fisherman
Super Moderator
iTrader: (0)
 
The Dad Fisherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
Absolutely, war is hell and should be avoided as much as absolutely possible. There has also not been a global, industrial scale hot war in 70+ years.
"The soldier above all others prays for peace, for it is the soldier who must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war."

Douglas MacArthur

"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
The Dad Fisherman is online now  
Old 07-12-2018, 12:54 PM   #10
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,067
The russian military budget is 47 Billion
The USA 647 Billion
Add the rest of NATO, another 300 Billion
from Global Firepower an interesting site
There is way more to it than just money

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 01:11 PM   #11
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,942
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
The russian military budget is 47 Billion
The USA 647 Billion
Add the rest of NATO, another 300 Billion
from Global Firepower an interesting site
There is way more to it than just money
Yes, now look at expenditures as a percentage going towards equipment, not personnel, costs.

RUS is not buying a lot of new kit, but they are modernizing a lot of their old gear and have modernized a lot of that gear over the past 10 years. They broke a significant part of their funds to do it.

Why?

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 01:17 PM   #12
Got Stripers
Ledge Runner Baits
iTrader: (0)
 
Got Stripers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
Absolutely, war is hell and should be avoided as much as absolutely possible. There has also not been a global, industrial scale hot war in 70+ years.
As costly as war back then was in loss of life, can you imagine what the loss would be to life and the ecosystem if someone get's their finger on a nuclear button. One would think that after all the global conflicts resulting in so much loss of life, we would find a way to globally play nicely in the sandbox called earth. If we don't generations from now are going to be in deep crap and paying for our mishandling of their world.
Got Stripers is online now  
Old 07-12-2018, 02:01 PM   #13
DZ
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
DZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,571
I've worked at an institute of higher military learning for many years. The topic of NATO burden sharing is not a new one. Just about every president has addressed it.

Read this from 2014 and some of you may be surprised:

http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs...-t-do-it-alone

Even militarization of space (Space Force) has been/is a serious topic of future concern.

Like most issues they are complex and we cannot oversimplify them.

DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"

Bi + Ne = SB 2

If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
DZ is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 02:07 PM   #14
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,067
A quote attributed to Alfred Einstein
"I don't know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought with, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones"
Unfortunately the world is always one fool away from war.

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 02:07 PM   #15
wdmso
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
Yes, now look at expenditures as a percentage going towards equipment, not personnel, costs.

RUS is not buying a lot of new kit, but they are modernizing a lot of their old gear and have modernized a lot of that gear over the past 10 years. They broke a significant part of their funds to do it.

Why?
Because we are because china is because Nato is ??

Nato had already agreed to get to 2% by 2024 "But demands of 2% 'immediately; undermines US commitment to existing obligations."

then he suggested moving the goal post to 4%

this is a Trend for Trump then the Russian Gas thing he is just pissed they wont buy ours

and this comment

"Yesterday I let them know that I was extremely unhappy with what was happening," Trump said, adding that, in response, European countries agreed to up their spending.

"They have substantially upped their commitment and now we're very happy and have a very, very powerful, very, very strong NATO," he said.


Now he try's to make himself look he accomplished something

"I can you tell you that NATO now is a really a fine-tuned machine. People are paying money that they never paid before. They're happy to do it. And the United States is being treated much more fairly.

its so so used car salesman its sad...
wdmso is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 02:25 PM   #16
wdmso
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,097
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by DZ View Post
I've worked at an institute of higher military learning for many years. The topic of NATO burden sharing is not a new one. Just about every president has addressed it.

Read this from 2014 and some of you may be surprised:

http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs...-t-do-it-alone

Even militarization of space (Space Force) has been/is a serious topic of future concern.

Like most issues they are complex and we cannot oversimplify them.
yes many past POTUS have addressed this issue and we cannot oversimplify them but someone Forgot to tell Trump he huffed and puffed and still walked away with 2% by 2024 from Nato

but for his fan base at home he showed them who's large and in charge and how an alpha male gets things done MAGA .. facts details dont matter its all about the show ... And Trump is Fantastic at it...
I'll give him that
wdmso is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 03:04 PM   #17
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,067
Look at Germany’s commitment to renewables
Their goal is to need as little as possible from others
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Pete F. is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 03:49 PM   #18
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,942
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZ View Post
I've worked at an institute of higher military learning for many years. The topic of NATO burden sharing is not a new one. Just about every president has addressed it.

Read this from 2014 and some of you may be surprised:

http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs...-t-do-it-alone

Even militarization of space (Space Force) has been/is a serious topic of future concern.

Like most issues they are complex and we cannot oversimplify them.
Yes - and it has been an issue addressed by Obama, and Bob Gates & Gen Craddock, all under previous admin. 2% by 2025, frankly, is almost a joke when compared to the seriousness of the situation.

Many of these countries that have the means yet are spending the least but are expecting the US to make up the difference. Few of the countries meeting existing obligations are the ones with the deep pockets.

Those countries with Deep Pockets can't sail, can't fly, and can't hold ground. The country most responsible for the political and economic engine of Europe cannot defend itself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
Because we are because china is because Nato is ??

Nato had already agreed to get to 2% by 2024 "But demands of 2% 'immediately; undermines US commitment to existing obligations."

then he suggested moving the goal post to 4%

this is a Trend for Trump then the Russian Gas thing he is just pissed they wont buy ours

and this comment

"Yesterday I let them know that I was extremely unhappy with what was happening," Trump said, adding that, in response, European countries agreed to up their spending.

"They have substantially upped their commitment and now we're very happy and have a very, very powerful, very, very strong NATO," he said.


Now he try's to make himself look he accomplished something

"I can you tell you that NATO now is a really a fine-tuned machine. People are paying money that they never paid before. They're happy to do it. And the United States is being treated much more fairly.

its so so used car salesman its sad...
Not sure what to make of this??



Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
yes many past POTUS have addressed this issue and we cannot oversimplify them but someone Forgot to tell Trump he huffed and puffed and still walked away with 2% by 2024 from Nato

but for his fan base at home he showed them who's large and in charge and how an alpha male gets things done MAGA .. facts details dont matter its all about the show ... And Trump is Fantastic at it...
I'll give him that
Gee, sure hope 2024 is soon enough.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 04:56 PM   #19
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,190
I think both Japan and Germany are of similar mindset and they still remember their aggressive past. They've gotten better recently but still have a ways to go.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
PaulS is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 05:38 PM   #20
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,190
Trump did a great job at the summit as he said he got all of the participants to increase their allocations.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
PaulS is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 06:43 PM   #21
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,181
Same MO. Create chaos, accomplish little of value to the US or our allies and declare victory because it strokes his ego. Sure we have legit issues with NATO but the trust he undermined in just a few days isn’t a good thing at all for our national security. Putin is smiling.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 06:52 PM   #22
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,942
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
I think both Japan and Germany are of similar mindset and they still remember their aggressive past. They've gotten better recently but still have a ways to go.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device



I think they both have aged better but Japan understands that their neighbors across the straits do not want to be accommodating. Granted China has reasons to be pissed.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 07:15 PM   #23
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Same MO. Create chaos, accomplish little of value to the US or our allies and declare victory because it strokes his ego. Sure we have legit issues with NATO but the trust he undermined in just a few days isn’t a good thing at all for our national security. Putin is smiling.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
quit whining...
scottw is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 09:16 PM   #24
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Same MO. Create chaos, accomplish little of value to the US or our allies and declare victory because it strokes his ego. Sure we have legit issues with NATO but the trust he undermined in just a few days isn’t a good thing at all for our national security. Putin is smiling.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Your specificity, as usual, is so beautifully vague . . . you are the poet of floating words . . . grand notions fluttering like butterfly wings . . . touching here and there . . . occasionally close to ground.
detbuch is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 10:10 PM   #25
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch View Post
Your specificity, as usual, is so beautifully vague . . . you are the poet of floating words . . . grand notions fluttering like butterfly wings . . . touching here and there . . . occasionally close to ground.
Well be specific then
Do you believe we should be part of NATO
Is the USA an important part of the
current world order?
Should the USA be involved in issues outside our borders?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline  
Old 07-12-2018, 11:25 PM   #26
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
Well be specific then
Do you believe we should be part of NATO

I've been very specific about my basic beliefs regarding the USA. I answer a lot of questions directed at me. You mostly shy away from direct answers. You like to make suggestions. I have tried to discuss a few threads you started and you just went away. I tried to be specific in your threads re health care. You brought up various worldwide statistics as if that was supposed to suggest some kind of specificity. And had no direct opinion, for instance on the market based clinics that were far more affordable than most of the world wide state models of health care that you suggested, I guess, could be copied.

So I am not inclined to answer questions by you since it seems to be a one way exercise. You ask, but you don't answer.

But I'll give it a try here. If Europe was really united, it would not need the U.S. to be a partner in defense against Russia. The EU has far more wealth and research capability than Russia. A united Europe that had the will and desire, should be able to militarily crush Russia. If it doesn't have the will and desire to defend itself, why should we spend blood and treasure to do it.

Our federal government should spend only on those things it is given the power to do under the Constitution. Military defense of the country is one of the main constitutional duties of the federal government. We should quit nationally spending trillions of dollars on funding our European style administrative state, and revert to being American. We should be powerful enough to defend ourselves against any threat.

And if anyone wishes to freely trade with us on a mutually advantageous basis, welcome. And if they join us as freedom loving, free market people, it could well be in our interest to mutually join in defensive or offensive alliances against those who wish to do us harm. But let it be known that there is zero tolerance for those who illegitimately harm one American. That we are willing and able to assert all out military might against those who would wrongly cut off the head of one American.

Right now, Europe is a mess imploding on itself. And that's not because of Trump or the U.S. The notion that Trump is undermining some notion of trust by sticking our boot up Europe's lazy, selfish, socialist azz to stir it out of its self-indulgent stupor, is pathetic demagoguery. If we're to spend time, effort, money, and manpower to provide comfort against Russia, while we are becoming more like the Euros in this country, that does not make for a good alliance.

I don't think we should be a part of NATO if trade is not free and the Euros depend more on us than themselves.

Actually, an alliance with Eastern European countries who are fervent in their desire to participate against a Russian threat would be, in my estimation, a healthier alliance than NATO as it has become.


Is the USA an important part of the
current world order?

When I mentioned the world order on this forum, it was dismissed by "liberals" as right wing kookiness. I think the USA is important, so long as it maintains its unique society based on the Declaration and its Constitution, world order or not. If we become like the rest of the world, we are of no particular importance as a country.

Should the USA be involved in issues outside our borders?
See above.
detbuch is offline  
Old 07-13-2018, 06:12 AM   #27
wdmso
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,097
then off to England and says this

Trump

Europe as a whole was "losing its culture" because of immigration from the Middle East and Africa.


What a statement from the POTUS!! the Leader the American people from land of Immigrants .... making new friend where ever he goes
wdmso is offline  
Old 07-13-2018, 07:36 AM   #28
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,942
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
Well be specific then
Do you believe we should be part of NATO
Is the USA an important part of the
current world order?
Should the USA be involved in issues outside our borders?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Yes, we should be part of NATO and like all good partnerships, they only work when everyone pitches in - most of Europe needs to step in for THEIR protection.


Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
then off to England and says this

Trump

Europe as a whole was "losing its culture" because of immigration from the Middle East and Africa.


What a statement from the POTUS!! the Leader the American people from land of Immigrants .... making new friend where ever he goes
Europe is losing its culture to a degree. Immigrants really need to assimilate, those that do tend to do well, those that don't assimilate tend be disruptive to themselves or the host nation.

For all of our problems, the USA has done a better job of assimilating than other countries. Though in recent decades the assimilation part seems not as strong (how much is the lens of history, how much the encouragement of identity politics)

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 07-13-2018, 08:03 AM   #29
Sea Dangles
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Sea Dangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
then off to England and says this

Trump

Europe as a whole was "losing its culture" because of immigration from the Middle East and Africa.


What a statement from the POTUS!! the Leader the American people from land of Immigrants .... making new friend where ever he goes
You know why we press 1 for English?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
Sea Dangles is offline  
Old 07-13-2018, 10:55 AM   #30
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch View Post
Your specificity, as usual, is so beautifully vague . . . you are the poet of floating words . . . grand notions fluttering like butterfly wings . . . touching here and there . . . occasionally close to ground.
Trying to summarize.
spence is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com