Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
it is a legal judgment against them for something they did...it's "after the fact"...if someone has a restraining order against them because they threatened or injured someone they should not be playing with guns
stop trying to twist things to make your argument
|
you can get a restraining order, at least in CT, against someone who hasn’t done anything yet ( certainly nothing illegal) but who is deemed to be likely to do something in the future. mental
illness can be a big reason.
if you say you’re ok with keeping guns away from
the seriously mentally ill ( which means not only denying them guns, but possibly others in the same house), maybe were not that far off.
i’m not even saying let’s do it, but we can have the conversation about the benefits and costs.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Hybrid Mode
