Hilarys emails

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

That's it? How many posts and threads did you make about Hillary but that is it for Trump even though what he did appears to be far worse?

And let's see all the people who commented if they come back and comment on Trump?

Bruce, TDF, John, SD, DZ, Scott.

It is Hillarius.

tell me how
many posts you’d like me to make. this, coming from the guy who cries about how often i post. now you’re crying that i don’t post more. which is it?

do you have the same number of posts criticizing the left as you criticize the right?

i’ve made lots of posts here bashing trumps lack of ethics.

grasping at straws.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

tell me how
many posts you’d like me to make. this, coming from the guy who cries about how often i post. now you’re crying that i don’t post more. which is it?

do you have the same number of posts criticizing the left as you criticize the right? no, not even close. I don't praise the left in posts or threads other than to point out the hypocrisy of criticizing one side when the other side does the same thing.

i’ve made lots of posts here bashing trumps lack of ethics.

grasping at straws.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Make as many as you want. But you went on and on with hundreds of posts about the server but the more egregious stealing and destroying of classified docs seemed to be ok.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Make as many as you want. But you went on and on with hundreds of posts about the server but the more egregious stealing and destroying of classified docs seemed to be ok.

i make too many posts pointing out your sides hypocrisy.

everyone here agrees trump us a horribly flawed person, no one says otherwise, so there’s nothing to debate


but none of you can criticize a liberal, so that’s where there’s debate.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

did he flush cartons of classified documents down the toilet before or after he peed on the hookers?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i make too many posts pointing out your sides hypocrisy.

everyone here agrees trump us a horribly flawed person, no one says otherwise, so there’s nothing to debate


but none of you can criticize a liberal, so that’s where there’s debate.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think with the Rs giving themselves over to Trump they have shown more hypocrisy than any either party has ever shown.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I think with the Rs giving themselves over to Trump they have shown more hypocrisy than any either party has ever shown.

and i think democrats are just as comfortable ignoring a candidates personal behavior when they like his policies. The party of the clintons, the kennedy’s, and robert byrd, all of a sudden insists that character matters.

the whole time bill clinton was president, democrats chose to
ignore his ethics and judge him on policy. i actually agree with that logic, and i apply it to both sides.

zero hypocrisy.

you guys will post all day long about trumps flaws, and will
never admit to any flaws for any democrat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

and i think democrats are just as comfortable ignoring a candidates personal behavior when they like his policies. The party of the clintons, the kennedy’s, and robert byrd, all of a sudden insists that character matters.

the whole time bill clinton was president, democrats chose to
ignore his ethics and judge him on policy. i actually agree with that logic, and i apply it to both sides.

zero hypocrisy.

you guys will post all day long about trumps flaws, and will
never admit to any flaws for any democrat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Trump has more flaws (and if he only had "flaws" it wouldn't be that big of a deal) than any Pres. in our lifetime. The Rs set the table for our current political climate by complaining about the most minor things (Obama wearing a brown suit and disgracing the office, saluting w/a cup of coffee in his hands, etc) and politicizing investigations (Bengahzi). So after 8 years of that and then Trump they deserve everything thrown at them.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Trump has more flaws (and if he only had "flaws" it wouldn't be that big of a deal) than any Pres. in our lifetime. The Rs set the table for our current political climate by complaining about the most minor things (Obama wearing a brown suit and disgracing the office, saluting w/a cup of coffee in his hands, etc) and politicizing investigations (Bengahzi). So after 8 years of that and then Trump they deserve everything thrown at them.

So Bill Clinton and the Kennedy’s have an acceptable
number flaws, Trump has too many. That’s convenient!

what’s the maximum number of acceptable flaws, anyway?

right, you call people retards, but just everyone else who sets the table. poor you. poor, poor you.

democrats didn’t do any of it. democrats haven’t been calling everyone who disagrees with them racist Nazis since W was president, nope.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

So Bill Clinton and the Kennedy’s have an acceptable
number flaws, Trump has too many. That’s convenient!

what’s the maximum number of acceptable flaws, anyway? Did I ever say that?

right, you call people retards, but just everyone else who sets the table. poor you. poor, poor you. Don't lie. Did I call anyone a retard or was I mocking the conservatives who had no problem watching Trump mock a handicapped reporter? I guess some people don't have the handicapped's backs. Is this like when you said Pete went after TDF's family and Pete finally pulled up the quote and this is not what happened?

democrats didn’t do any of it. democrats haven’t been calling everyone who disagrees with them racist Nazis since W was president, nope.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And Rs haven't been calling everyone who disagrees with them names since forever.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

And Rs haven't been calling everyone who disagrees with them names since forever.

seriously...are you 12 years old?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

And Rs haven't been calling everyone who disagrees with them names since forever.

i agree they have.

you’re the one, not me, who said “the R’a set the table for the current climate.”

again, you can’t concede the behavior of the left. none of you can.

hilary says we’re deplorable and irredeemable, Biden says we want to put blacks back in chains. Obama
says republicans “hate all the time”.

poor, poor you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i agree they have.

you’re the one, not me, who said “the R’a set the table for the current climate.” yes, one in which is far worse than it ever has been.

again, you can’t concede the behavior of the left. none of you can. you keep claiming that bc no one posted something about the

hilary says we’re deplorable and irredeemableshe actually said like 50%. Looking at the % who can't concede Biden won, I would say she underestimated. and never mind her apology., Biden says we want to put blacks back in chains. Obama
says republicans “hate all the time”.

poor, poor you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Don't worry about me. I don't need to come here 7 days a week for all hours to answer every post that I don't like.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Don't worry about me. I don't need to come here 7 days a week for all hours to answer every post that I don't like.

11 years old?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Don't worry about me. I don't need to come here 7 days a week for all hours to answer every post that I don't like.

but you’d never, ever say that to pete ow wdmso.

everything is ok when liberals do it!!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Again not sure why Jim didn’t post this story. I know he and other were more concerned That Obama wasn’t wearing a mask Priorities?

National Archives asks Justice Dept. to investigate Trump’s handling of White House records

So let’s see this goes 1 of 2 ways

He tore them up and because he’s a baby.

Or He took and Tore them up because he’s a baby and trying to hide from the Truth or lies those documents may hold

But but Hillary emails. How do it go?

Oh yea. LOCK HER UP !
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

but you’d never, ever say that to pete ow wdmso.

everything is ok when liberals do it!!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I like you better.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Again not sure why Jim didn’t post this story. I know he and other were more concerned That Obama wasn’t wearing a mask Priorities?

National Archives asks Justice Dept. to investigate Trump’s handling of White House records

So let’s see this goes 1 of 2 ways

He tore them up and because he’s a baby.

Or He took and Tore them up because he’s a baby and trying to hide from the Truth or lies those documents may hold

But but Hillary emails. How do it go?

Oh yea. LOCK HER UP !
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Normally he'd have his lawyer or accountant hide all the criminal acts, so he can keep his hands clean and say hey I didn't know. I guess in the white house maybe it wasn't that easy to set up the usual fall guys.

Frankly tearing up those documents is against federal law, have they not charged him yet because more is coming down the line? His actions are criminal both on the records and the attempt to change the election, wonder if this AG has the balls to charge the idiot. He surrounded himself with like idiots, who just continue to go on talk shows to reveal what they were attempting, what the plan was and who was involved. It is amazing that this idiot still has such a grip on the republican party, I almost hope he can run again, as I think it would bring out a massive turnout to keep him out of the white house again.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Again not sure why Jim didn’t post this story. I know he and other were more concerned That Obama wasn’t wearing a mask Priorities?

National Archives asks Justice Dept. to investigate Trump’s handling of White House records

So let’s see this goes 1 of 2 ways

He tore them up and because he’s a baby.

Or He took and Tore them up because he’s a baby and trying to hide from the Truth or lies those documents may hold

But but Hillary emails. How do it go?

Oh yea. LOCK HER UP !
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

She didn't get locked up. So . . . goose/gander

[Pete F.]

The National Archives (not DOJ or FBI) recovered 15(?) boxes of documents from Mar a Lago 13 months after they "left" the White House.

How many boxes would have been uncovered on January 21st, 2021?
We'll never know how much was removed, shredded, or flushed during the interim.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Normally he'd have his lawyer or accountant hide all the criminal acts, so he can keep his hands clean and say hey I didn't know. I guess in the white house maybe it wasn't that easy to set up the usual fall guys.

Frankly tearing up those documents is against federal law, have they not charged him yet because more is coming down the line? His actions are criminal both on the records and the attempt to change the election, wonder if this AG has the balls to charge the idiot. He surrounded himself with like idiots, who just continue to go on talk shows to reveal what they were attempting, what the plan was and who was involved. It is amazing that this idiot still has such a grip on the republican party, I almost hope he can run again, as I think it would bring out a massive turnout to keep him out of the white house again.

Another report just came out that he clogged WH toilets trying to flush documents. No wonder he complained that people had to flush their toilet 10 - 15 times.

[Got Stripers]

If only we could flush Trump from our minds and politics, the guy is going to go down in history as the nut job we (meaning you) elected to president. Top secret files taken to his golf course, missing phone logs, flushing records in the Oval Office toilet; if you saw this in a movie you’d change the channel as it’s to fu*ked up.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

If only we could flush Trump from our minds and politics, the guy is going to go down in history as the nut job we (meaning you) elected to president. Top secret files taken to his golf course, missing phone logs, flushing records in the Oval Office toilet; if you saw this in a movie you’d change the channel as it’s to fu*ked up.

some dummies continue to obsess over him....

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Another report just came out that he clogged WH toilets trying to flush documents.

the source is a NY Times reporter so the source is questionable at best...and this is what was written/said...

“I learned that staff in the White House residence would periodically find the toilet clogged, the engineer would have to come and fix it. And what the engineer would generally find would be wads of, you know, wet, printed paper, meaning it was not toilet paper, this was either notes or some other piece of paper that they believed he had thrown down the toilet,” Haberman said during an appearance on CNN on Thursday morning.“What it could be, Brianna, could be anybody’s guess. It could be post-its, it could be notes he wrote to himself, it could be other things,” Haberman added. “It certainly does add, as you said, another dimension to what we know about how he handled material in the White House.”


it's fun that the left has become so insane that some are fretting and wondering about what was in trump's toilet...

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by scottw

to many GOP dummies continue to obsess over him....

Fixed

[Pete F.]

Everything Donald Trump accused others of doing, whether it was Hillary Clinton or his Republican rivals, we keep finding out he did it himself. Literally everything.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

She didn't get locked up. So . . . goose/gander

Why is that the line of defense from Conservatives and Republicans on anything Trump

No blood no foul. Or they didn’t succeed ? Stepping right over Intent as if it doesn’t matter


Some Trump records taken to Mar-a-Lago clearly marked as classified, including documents at ‘top secret’ level

But but
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Stepping right over Intent as if it doesn’t matter

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you are constantly quick assume intent....


"Citing two people familiar with the matter, The Post reported on Thursday......

It is unclear how many classified documents were recovered by the National Archives, according to The Post.

Two sources told the newspaper that some records had labels signaling that the information within was very sensitive...

The National Archives has reportedly asked the Department of Justice to look into Trump’s handling of documents related to his time in the White House following the reports of records being seized from Mar-a-Lago.

The Post reported on Wednesday that the referral from the National Archives sparked conversation among federal prosecutors about potentially probing if Trump committed a crime by not properly turning over records.


It is reportedly unclear, however, if the department will go ahead with such an effort."


geez....I wonder why?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

you are constantly quick assume intent....


"Citing two people familiar with the matter, The Post reported on Thursday......

It is unclear how many classified documents were recovered by the National Archives, according to The Post.

Two sources told the newspaper that some records had labels signaling that the information within was very sensitive...

The National Archives has reportedly asked the Department of Justice to look into Trump’s handling of documents related to his time in the White House following the reports of records being seized from Mar-a-Lago.

The Post reported on Wednesday that the referral from the National Archives sparked conversation among federal prosecutors about potentially probing if Trump committed a crime by not properly turning over records.


It is reportedly unclear, however, if the department will go ahead with such an effort."


geez....I wonder why?

Seems you and I have a different understanding of unclear .

It tells me no decisions have been made


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Seems you and I have a different understanding of unclear .

It tells me no decisions have been made


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

you'd think they'd be busting down the doors before any more top secret documents are flushed down the toilet

[Pete F.]

Is now a good time to ask how much classified information Trump and Jared Kushner passed along to MBS, Putin, Orbán, Bolsonaro and their other autocrat buddies? And how many documents they hid or destroyed related to that?