Immigration hysteria

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by scottw

you left out the headline....

US supreme court upholds Trump's travel ban
Blow to anti-discrimination advocates as justices rule 5-4 in favor of Trump administration after months of legal battles

talk about taking selective quotes to create a narrative...geeze....

What did the travel ban have to do with this discussion?
John Roberts pointed comment regarding Trumps leadership does

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

What did the travel ban have to do with this discussion?

I wondered that when you linked the article

oh that's right, this thread is about leftist's hysteria

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

John Roberts pointed comment regarding Trumps leadership does

which one?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

John Roberts pointed comment regarding Trumps leadership does

while we wait for your clarification....here are Justice Kennedy's pointed comments regarding the leadership of the "progressive" California Legislature...

"The California Legislature included in its official history the congratulatory statement that the Act was part of California’s legacy of “forward thinking.” App. 38–39. But it is not forward thinking to force individuals to “be an instrument for fostering public adherence to an ideological point of view [they] fin[d] unacceptable.” Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U. S. 705, 715 (1977). It is forward thinking to begin by reading the First Amendment as ratified in 1791; to understand the history of authoritarian government as the Founders then knew it; to confirm that history since then shows how relentless authoritarian regimes are in their attempts to stifle free speech; and to carry those lessons onward as we seek to preserve and teach the necessity of freedom of speech for the generations to come. Governments must not be allowed to force persons to express a message contrary to their deepest convictions. Freedom of speech secures freedom of thought and belief. This law imperils those liberties."