Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
No, Rittenhouse was not carrying his weapon for self protection, he choose to put himself in that position, as a “medic” with a gun?
So, what are you saying. He brought the gun because he wanted to shoot somebody? He wanted hunt for somebody to shoot?
If the poor lad had gone there without a firearm, he would not be labeled as a killer, no one would have died.
How the hell do you know that? How the hell do you know that the gun was not for self protection? You just have to say something and anything that passes through your lips is irrefutable truth?
He made a conscious choice, with the guidance of his mother, an adult I assume, to put himself into this situation.
So, with your irrefutable lips, you are saying he made a conscious choice to be attacked in order to have an alibi to shoot somebody?
Are you claiming that people no longer assume personal responsibility for their actions, if’s the other parties fault as long as it’s the other party
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Are you claiming that 17 year old Rittenhouse was the only person there who had agency and responsibility for his actions? That he didn't belong there? That he had no reason to react to the riots. And that all the rioters had the sole right and reason to be there because it was a riot and they were the rioters? And why the hell should anybody but a rioter have any reason or cause to be there? That the rioters did not need to justify their presence at the riot nor be required to explain why they brought weapons because they were the rioters and so obviously they need not explain their presence nor have to assume any responsibility for their actions? That because they were the justified rioters, not the "other," that it was Rittenhouse's fault because he is the "other" party.
You're full of some insane crap.
Threaded Mode