Hunter

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Hasn't been unpleasant for me at all. I told you I think you are a di ck with the way you insult people and that is prob. why you have NO friends here at all. I'm not trying to twist anything. You insult me I'll insult you back. Pretty simple. Someone doesn't insult me I could care less. You can't have anyone disagree with you or you get angry and insult them. I pointed out the 2 other threads you started and Pete commented on (w/no insults) and like a little bit ch you came back both times with insults - bc that is what you do. You post misogynistic posts I'll call you out. I think this has been fun also just reminding you that you have no friends here. There is no one you can call to ask to go fishing, no one you can call to see how they are doing, no one will call you to go fishing, no one will send you a note on Christmas wishing you a Merry Christmas. Should I go on?

If Kevin mocks liberals he has to expect some blow back. It seems to bother you more than him.

"I'm not trying to twist anything."

That's just about all you're doing...

"Someone doesn't insult me I could care less. "

Not true. We've all seen you call out the conservatives here for insulting people who are not you. What you could care less about, is when any conservative is insulted. That's what you don't care about. Insults are tolerated and justified when they come from the left. All other insults are a character flaw.

"You post misogynistic posts I'll call you out"

Why? 2 seconds ago, you said you couldnt care less unless it was about you? And why don't you call about misogynistic posts that come from your fellow liberals?


"If Kevin mocks liberals he has to expect some blow back"

Yet when I insult Hilary after she calls me deplorable and irredeemable, you say it's wrong for me to insult her.

You are therefore clearly saying, that only democrats can fight back. Sorry if I don't accept that Paul. What's good for the goose...

You can't win this. You're holding the 2 sides to completely different standards, and you can't spin it any other way. You're saying liberals can insult back if they've been insulted first, but conservatives can't.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"

You can't win this. You're holding the 2 sides to completely different standards, and you can't spin it any other way. You're saying liberals can insult back if they've been insulted first, but conservatives can't.

I'm not holding anyone to different standards. Go see post 103.

If you see a lib. insult a cons. insult them back. Have at it. But the majority of the insults thrown around here are by the Cons. Always has been. SD never added anything other than insults. Snarky Scott hardly ever adds anything but is quick with insults/spelling/grammer corrections, etc. Even Kevin hardly adds anything except memes or comments on spelling. It is not my job to point out every insult.

If you want me to be a moderator here you prob. wouldn't last a day bc all you do is insult people. Go look at the 2 threads I pointed out. You keep ignore that.

[scottw]

^^^^^serious narcissism

we've read your posts...it's not pretty

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

^^^^^serious narcissism

we've read your posts...it's not pretty

Serious Snarky trolling.

As I said snarky Scott hardly ever adds anything but is quick with insults/spelling/grammer corrections, etc.

Such a bad look for an adult male.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Such a bad look for an adult male.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Suck my di ck you douchebag.




this will live in infamy.....

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Suck my di ck you douchebag.




this will live in infamy.....

you’re forgetting the cornerstone of liberalism….everything is OK when liberals do it.

probably a bunch of in-cel’s.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you’re forgetting the cornerstone of liberalism….everything is OK when liberals do it.

probably a bunch of in-cel’s.

Who is a bunch of incels?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I'm not holding anyone to different standards. Go see post 103.

If you see a lib. insult a cons. insult them back. Have at it. But the majority of the insults thrown around here are by the Cons. Always has been. SD never added anything other than insults. Snarky Scott hardly ever adds anything but is quick with insults/spelling/grammer corrections, etc. Even Kevin hardly adds anything except memes or comments on spelling. It is not my job to point out every insult.

If you want me to be a moderator here you prob. wouldn't last a day bc all you do is insult people. Go look at the 2 threads I pointed out. You keep ignore that.

for the tenth time, you called me out for sexism when i insulted hilary, but defended pete when he insulted TDFs daughters.

So insulting women is ok when your fellow lefties do it, not on when i do it

different standards.

your back hurt from moving the goalposts so many times on this thread?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

for the tenth time, you called me out for sexism when i insulted hilary, but defended pete when he insulted TDFs daughters. I told you why he did it. Did you not understand? You want Kevin to be able to insult liberal woman (in jest) and so Pete did the same w/Kevin's daughter (in jest).

So insulting women is ok when your fellow lefties do it, not on when i do it

different standards.

your back hurt from moving the goalposts so many times on this thread?Ok douchebag

Sorry your so upset you sniveling snowflake.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Sorry your so upset you sniveling snowflake.

yes you told me pete was responding to a previous insult. therefore his sexist insult was ok.

when insulted hilary, i was also responding to a specific previous insult ( calling americans deplorable and irredeemable). But that was sexist.

you’re proving my point. You are on with pete’s i suits when hes responding to a previous insult, but it’s not ok when i do the same exact thing.

because he’s a liberal, so it’s ok when he does it.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

yes you told me pete was responding to a previous insult. therefore his sexist insult was ok.

when insulted hilary, i was also responding to a specific previous insult ( calling americans deplorable and irredeemable). But that was sexist.

you’re proving my point. You are on with pete’s i suits when hes responding to a previous insult, but it’s not ok when i do the same exact thing.

because he’s a liberal, so it’s ok when he does it.

Your insults are misogynistic. That what is it when you comment on woman's looks. Like you use to do with Hillary, Rachel M. Etc.