Try that with your friends at dinner and see the reaction.

Does he have any?

:hidin:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Try that with your friends at dinner and see the reaction.

i don’t need to, i don’t use hate speech. since you do, why don’t you go to the special olympics some time and say “retard”, and tell us the reaction you get.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Does he have any?

:hidin:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

good one!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

paul, if i used the n word in public, id expect to get pummeled. if i made fun of special olympian’s for not being athletic, i’d expect to make disabled people cry.

is the former so much worse to you? again, since your side has no problem eliminating special olympian’s from existence at birth, maybe that’s no surprise.

They weren't the same movements.

You have been duped, not me. If you believe that Trump just happened coincidentally made those movements while discussing that reporter, you're so filled with hate that you can't emotionally think straight.

So, Paul, you claim that Trump imitated the reporters movements. Serge Kovaleski, the reporter, suffers from a congenital joint condition which severely restricts his ability to move his arms. Do you have some proof, another video perhaps, which shows Kovaleski making the "same movements" you said that Trump imitated. It is very doubtful (probably impossible) that Kovaleski is able to move the way Trump did in the video.

The only similarity between Trump's movements and Kovaleski that is found in searching this controversy is a freeze frame of that exact moment in Trump's wild gestures that his hand is bent at the wrist in front of his chest like Kovaleski's seems to be permanently paralyzed--a wrist bend that Trump often has in parts of his gestures when speaking.

But can't find any videos where kovaleski even moves his arms at all. I don't think it would be possible for him to move his arms the way Trump did. And if he tried, it would probably be too painful, if at all possible, to do so, and would not be worth the attempt for any purpose other than an attempt to ward off some kind of attacker or killer bee trying to sting him.

Trump actually has admitted that he mimicked what he thought would be a flustered reporter trying to get out of a statement he made long ago. That is, he was not mocking or imitating the movements of a disabled person, but rather his version of someone frustratingly trying to explain away a lie he got caught telling. Which is the very similar hand waving way he was filmed doing on other occasions when he mocked others who were trying to do the same type of weak self vindication.

I would hate to think that I am so filled with hate that I can't emotionally think straight, as you claim. But it just seems that the evidence shows that Trump was not imitating Kovaleski's movements, that he was imitating some stock version of frustration. So if you could, please, show some verification that Kovaleski actually moved like that, which so coincidentally resembles what Trump has been filmed doing a few times before, I would appreciate being relieved of the burden of hate you've found in me of which I have not even been aware. And also would like to be shown the truth that will allow me to "emotionally think straight" as you put it.

Though, I must admit, for me, my emotions and my thinking are different things. And when I let my emotions color or direct my thinking, it tends to blot out all rationality and logic--ergo my thinking, then, is not very "straight." All the more reason for me to be shown the truth in this aforementioned mocking situation. No doubt the real truth will meld my thinking and my emotion about it into a very straight "emotional thinking" and enlightened vision of the real reality.

Much appreciation, therefor, if you could show Kovaleski making the moves that Trump imitated.

The master of verbosity strikes a blow, cushioned in a plethora of words to disguise the fact that his sword has no edge and is made of naught but false beliefs in a shallow weak man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Thanks for the poetry Bitchslappedboy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Thanks for the poetry Bitchslappedboy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think it's called doggerel.

Ah sweetness, you will learn.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think we need an investigation into why skinny paul steals his friends fishing spots.....

I think we need an investigation into why skinny paul steals his friends fishing spots.....

I do wear skinny pants. Peter Millar, vince, etc. I think it has to do with my 50 mile bike rides.

I'm a little perplexed at that given I've never fished a spot a 2nd time* that anyone from this site as taken me to so it would be impossible for anyone to say I've stolen a spot. I've been taken out in boats 3x and since I don't have a boat it can't be those spots. I've been out 4-5 x surfcasting with different folks and *the only time I have fished a spot I went to with someone here was 1x driving to the canal I was talking to someone who said I should instead go out in my wetsuit to another spot we fished together previously.

I attribute that comment to him not being that smart so he couldn't think of anything to say but wanted to try to insult me.

I do wear skinny pants. Peter Millar, vince, etc. I think it has to do with my 50 mile bike rides.

I'm a little perplexed at that given I've never fished a spot a 2nd time* that anyone from this site as taken me to so it would be impossible for anyone to say I've stolen a spot. I've been taken out in boats 3x and since I don't have a boat it can't be those spots. I've been out 4-5 x surfcasting with different folks and *the only time I have fished a spot I went to with someone here was 1x driving to the canal I was talking to someone who said I should instead go out in my wetsuit to another spot we fished together previously.

I attribute that comment to him not being that smart so he couldn't think of anything to say but wanted to try to insult me.

you sound defensive...we will need more evidence and perhaps call some witnesses

you sound defensive...we will need more evidence and perhaps call some witnesses

I knew he would not own up to it. It would involve showing integrity. Not going to happen.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I knew he would not own up to it. It would involve showing integrity. Not going to happen.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Give us some more info scumbag. You got to lose some more weight you fat turd. As soon as you put that 20 back on your lifespan will probably be only another 15 years. You'll just feel your chest tightening up, gasping for air and then falling over. No big loss since you don't earn any $. LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Give us some more info scumbag. You got to lose some more weight you fat turd. As soon as you put that 20 back on your lifespan will probably be only another 15 years. You'll just feel your chest tightening up, gasping for air and then falling over. No big loss since you don't earn any $. I do wear skinny pants. :musc:

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

fixed it

Give us some more info scumbag. You got to lose some more weight you fat turd. As soon as you put that 20 back on your lifespan will probably be only another 15 years. You'll just feel your chest tightening up, gasping for air and then falling over. No big loss since you don't earn any $. LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Paul, for god's sake, you denied your own logic in this thread. You claimed your logic, was my logic. Look at this post of yours. Seriously?

Paul, for god's sake, you denied your own logic in this thread. You claimed your logic, was my logic. Look at this post of yours. Seriously?

Am I supposed to follow that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Am I supposed to follow that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes, you were.

On this thread, you said that hate speech is acceptable if used in a self-deprecating way. Then when I used an example, you claimed that was my logic, not yours.

That was before you said it would be no bog deal if someone died.

It's a good thing you're not angry.

You're coming completely un-glued. And i'm not saying that because we usually disagree, I'm not saying it to get you riled up. Read your posts on this thread. You like to go on and on about lecturing me about how you were raised better than me, that I have no class, etc. While those two things may both be true, you wouldn't know it from reading your posts here.

I knew he would not own up to it. It would involve showing integrity. Not going to happen.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You did it. You broke his brain.

Yes, you were.

On this thread, you said that hate speech is acceptable if used in a self-deprecating way. Then when I used an example, you claimed that was my logic, not yours.

That was before you said it would be no bog deal if someone died.

It's a good thing you're not angry.

You're coming completely un-glued. And i'm not saying that because we usually disagree, I'm not saying it to get you riled up. Read your posts on this thread. You like to go on and on about lecturing me about how you were raised better than me, that I have no class, etc. While those two things may both be true, you wouldn't know it from reading your posts here.
So I'm supposed to take his vile scummy lies? He hasn't added a single thing since he started posting here. Just as with you I've never insulted him first. And I'm a little concerned with him he has a Rollie Pollie body type with a fat stomach so he has an worst chance of long term survival. His BMI is probably over 30 so he hss a good chance being diabetic. So I'll ask why should I take his insult?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Give us some more info scumbag. You got to lose some more weight you fat turd. As soon as you put that 20 back on your lifespan will probably be only another 15 years. You'll just feel your chest tightening up, gasping for air and then falling over. No big loss since you don't earn any $. LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Such an angry,dishonest fellow. Obviously this sharing of information has struck a chord as we witness another unhinged rant from PaulS the biker. 🚴
Thanks for demonstrating why you were also referred to as whiny.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You did it. You broke his brain.

You two do seem like you would get along together well. Seems like you're Cut From the Same Cloth.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Such an angry,dishonest fellow. Obviously this sharing of information has struck a chord as we witness another unhinged rant from PaulS the biker. 🚴
Thanks for demonstrating why you were also referred to as whiny.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Rollue, why would anyone take your lies? As I said earlier don't you have any Pride not making any money? Next time you see your doctor ask them to let you get an A1C test determine whether you're diabetic or pre-diabetic.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So I'm supposed to take his vile scummy lies? He hasn't added a single thing since he started posting here. Just as with you I've never insulted him first. And I'm a little concerned with him he has a Rollie Pollie body type with a fat stomach so he has an worst chance of long term survival. His BMI is probably over 30 so he hss a good chance being diabetic. So I'll ask why should I take his insult?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I didn't say you're supposed to take it. I notice liberals have a pattern (sorry, for your benefit, let me say not every single liberal, but many) of responding to something that has never been said. When you can't respond to what has been said, it's a lot easier to react as if I said something stupid, something that I never came close to saying.

I didn't say just take it. I've told him to tone it down. But there are other options besides just taking it, or saying his death will be no big deal. There is actually a lot of room between those options, so I'm not sure why you'd act as if those are the only two choices.

It's also funny that when I responded to Pete, you chastised me for it. But you can respond to SD.

I didn't say you're supposed to take it. I notice liberals have a pattern (sorry, for your benefit, let me say not every single liberal, but many) of responding to something that has never been said. When you can't respond to what has been said, it's a lot easier to react as if I said something stupid, something that I never came close to saying.

I didn't say just take it. I've told him to tone it down. But there are other options besides just taking it, or saying his death will be no big deal. There is actually a lot of room between those options, so I'm not sure why you'd act as if those are the only two choices.

It's also funny that when I responded to Pete, you chastised me for it. But you can respond to SD.

You bring it on yourself by constantly insulting people first. So what do you find redeeming about Rollie? Don't forget this is the scummy guy who said certain people didn't make any sacrifice ( or something similar) for the pandemic but when asked what he did he can't answer.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Rollue, why would anyone take your lies? As I said earlier don't you have any Pride not making any money? Next time you see your doctor ask them to let you get an A1C test determine whether you're diabetic or pre-diabetic.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

PaulS,pour a glass of Chardonnay and have your husband give you a deep tissue massage. Just chill little fella.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

PaulS,pour a glass of Chardonnay and have your husband give you a deep tissue massage. Just chill little fella.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Rollie are you going to take me calling you out about your scummy vile lies? Does your husband not mind you not making any money? Or do they just think you're a pathetic loser?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You bring it on yourself by constantly insulting people first. So what do you find redeeming about Rollie? Don't forget this is the scummy guy who said certain people didn't make any sacrifice ( or something similar) for the pandemic but when asked what he did he can't answer.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"bring it on yourself by constantly insulting people first.'

Try to follow here...so when you used the word "retard" here for no possibly conceivable reason...was that not you insulting first? Or did the "retards" do something to you, that you were responding to?

Get off your high horse. Every time you lob insults, you say it's justified. When any conservative does it, it's never justified, it's always a character flaw. Always OK when you do it, always wrong when a conservative does it.

"bring it on yourself by constantly insulting people first.'

Try to follow here...so when you used the word "retard" here for no possibly conceivable reason...was that not you insulting first? Or did the "retards" do something to you, that you were responding to?

Get off your high horse. Every time you lob insults, you say it's justified. When any conservative does it, it's never justified, it's always a character flaw. Always OK when you do it, always wrong when a conservative does it.

As I told you, I used spazz and retard because watching Trump mock the reporter that's what a reasonable person would think. And I did it to mock Trump and the conservatives who have no problem with his doing that. I've never once said that when a conservative does lobs an insult that it's never Justified. However if you look at the conservatives on this site they're constantly insulting liberals first whether it's you, Scott with his snarky posts or Rollie.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

As I told you, I used spazz and retard because watching Trump mock the reporter that's what a reasonable person would think. And I did it to mock Trump and the conservatives who have no problem with his doing that. I've never once said that when a conservative does lobs an insult that it's never Justified. However if you look at the conservatives on this site they're constantly insulting liberals first whether it's you, Scott with his snarky posts or Rollie.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Even if a normal person thought what you thought, "retard" is not the word most people use to describe these people. I know what I'm talking about, and if you don't believe me, ask someone with a child who has Downs how the react to that word. It's every bit as offensive to them, as n*gger.

But you are a liberal, so it's not possible that you are wrong and I am right. Not even on this.

Ask someone with a child with Downs. Tell us what they say.

As I told you, I used spazz and retard because watching Trump mock the reporter that's what a reasonable person would think. And I did it to mock Trump and the conservatives who have no problem with his doing that. I've never once said that when a conservative does lobs an insult that it's never Justified. However if you look at the conservatives on this site they're constantly insulting liberals first whether it's you, Scott with his snarky posts or Rollie.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

At least twice, Detbuch asked you to provide evidence that Trump's physical gestures had any resemblance to the way this reporter moves. Did you ever respond to him? Is there any evidence that the gestures Trump made, can be reasonable interpreted as being an impersonation of the reporter?

Rollie are you going to take me calling you out about your scummy vile lies? Does your husband not mind you not making any money? Or do they just think you're a pathetic loser?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
You are educated but unfortunately a dumb coward. When asking about my husband (singular) and follow that reference with they (plural) it is obvious you know nothing about pronouns. I feel bad for you. Your bike shorts seem to have cut off the oxygen to your brain.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

....aaaaaaand we're done here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device