Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Since Obama got all teared up when discussing Newtown, can someone please explain how any of these new "laws" would have prevented that terrible tragedy?
I mean, this POS stole his mother's guns, killed her, then proceeded with the rest of the atrocity. His mother passed all of the very strict regs in CT to legally obtain her guns (which, like MA, requires one to pass a criminal background check to even be licensed to possess a gun!) |
Quote:
The Action is not an order until it goes thru congress The conflict is that it is not just about gunshow loopholes, there are 5 things added, some of them slippery slopes. They need to fix what they have for background checks before the potus tries to appease gun control advocates. 38 states report less than 80% of felonies which allowed mass murderers in the past to get thru the checks. I know we can do better |
Quote:
I don't understand why he does this crap, it just drives people away from the left toward the right |
Quote:
http://frater.com/suicidelist.html and not a lot of wiggle room on some of these methods either.... http://lostallhope.com/suicide-metho...lethal-methods 9 out of 10 times when you try hanging yourself you succeed....and the other 1 probably doesn't re-try it again because they can only eat soup through a straw due to the irreparable brain damage they suffered... |
|
Quote:
"Congress still needs to act," Obama said" And from another article: In short ... A presidential executive order "is a directive issued to federal agencies, department heads, or other federal employees by the President of the United States under his statutory or constitutional powers," according to Robert Longley, writing at usgovinfo.about.com. "In many ways, presidential executive orders are similar to written orders, or instructions issued by the president of a corporation to its department heads or directors." By contrast, a presidential executive action is kind of a catch-all term, writes NBC, which quoted an unnamed administration official in 2011 as saying: "It just means something the executive branch does. The use of any of a number of tools in the executive branch's toolbox." Political writer Tom Murse says: "[Most] executive actions carry no legal weight. Those that do actually set policy can be invalidated by the courts or undone by legislation passed by Congress." Murse writes: "The terms executive action and executive order are not interchangeable. Executive orders are legally binding and published in the Federal Register. "A good way to think of executive actions is a wish list of policies the president would like to see enacted." |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
OK,
so if it's an order then congress would need to un-do it well as I've said before, they should fix the system they have and stop blaming the guns for these tragedies he is crying about and find the real root of the issue |
Quote:
Bottom line: It would have done NOTHING to stop Newtown. Obama can cry us all a river, these actions won't stop this kind of thing from happening again. |
So the first stuff I quoted meant it was an executive action. I just saw an other article stating it was an executive order:mad:
Just wasting time on a slow day. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Check this out... http://www.cabelas.com/product/shoot...gclsrc%3Daw.ds |
Quote:
Yes, gang violence is a big issue but the easy availability of illegal guns is a major contributor to that violence. I read the ATF believes a majority of them come from only 8% of dealers but without good data and tracking they're hamstrung to clamp down. It seems like a solid majority want universal background checks...even NRA membership. It's a piece of the puzzle, not the entire solution. I had to get fingerprinted for my TSAPreCheck, I believe you have to get fingerprinted for a CCW, I've never owned a car that the Government wasn't aware of the VIN number. The idea that creating a Federal database is going to make it easier for the Government to confiscate your weapons is just paranoid fearmongering to keep the NRA executives in power. |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
And whoopie.....a law that requires them to be locked.....but she trusts her kid and still doesn't lock them up.....no effect on crisis at all....but everybody sure feels better Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
A person would only have to let their guard down once at the wrong time and access to a gun can be had. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
From Wikipedia:
"There are several versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with capitalization or punctuation differences. Differences exist between the drafted and ratified copies, the signed copies on display, and various published transcriptions.[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The importance (or lack thereof) of these differences has been the source of debate regarding the meaning and interpretation of the amendment, particularly regarding the importance of the prefatory clause. One version was passed by the Congress.[24][25][26][27][28] As passed by the Congress and preserved in the National Archives, with the rest of the original hand-written copy of the Bill of Rights prepared by scribe William Lambert:[29] A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, then-Secretary of State:[30] A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Playing devil's advocate here - my question is: Where does it say you can sell arms (ie guns)? |
Quote:
|
I was hoping for a more spirited debate than that.
|
Quote:
Agreed. Those guns in circulation will be there for 100 years. Obama's regs will have no real effectr. Spence, if someone with a bad background decides they want to kill someone, do you really believe these regs will stop him? There are all kinds of ways for people who would fail background checks, to get guns. "The idea that creating a Federal database is going to make it easier for the Government to confiscate your weapons is just paranoid " Agreed on that. This is such a small thing, in terms of making us safer. The effect on crime rates will barely be a rounding error. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people |
What is NICS and how does it work?
"Mandated by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 and launched by the FBI on November 30, 1998, NICS is used by Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to instantly determine whether a prospective buyer is eligible to buy firearms. " Congrats. Hussein obama has given you something thats been in place for quite a bit. Stay the course maybe he'll give you a pizza party or maybe even taco tuesday 😱 Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
I think the negligence of the mother had a lot to do with this tragedy. I don't agree that more laws would have prevented it. A better mental health system that picked up on this kid and a more involved parent that could have picked up on it? Absolutely. It seems like you are implying that if the government knew that the son had a mental illness then they should have not allowed the mother to purchase guns, which seems like a stretch. Still the fact remains Obama is doing nothing that could have prevented it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
LOL! true! and I don't think he has ever fake cried about all these kids killed in chicago either
|
The Virginia Tech shooter was mentally ill.
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Yes he was - so the question is how do we prevent someone like that from getting a gun? Do doctors have to become government informants now?
|
Um. I would think that anyone who shoots anyone not in self defense is considered mentally ill. Or have we all been conditioned into thinking that it's normal human behavior to bust a cap in a few asses ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
As for the rest, this is the boring drum you keep beating. It's like if rules aren't perfect they're worthless. Tell that to the auto regulators. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com