Quote:
If anything, veterans of the civil war against the Qaddafi regime, if they were that rather than anti-U.S. jihadists, would have PROTECTED the embassy from the supposed "small number of people" who came to the embassy to "replicate" the Cairo violence. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The militias have various interests and range from moderate to extreme. Calling for Sharia law doesn't make you alQaeda, it makes you an Islamic fundamentalist. Hell, Saudi Arabia's legal system is based on Sharia. Now, it would be logical for disparate extremist groups to share some common brand identity. Certainly make marketing more efficient. If any one of these groups acts in their own interest that happens to be a shared interest does that make them alQaeda...is that what it means now? Does using violence to advance a goal of imposing Sharia Law make you alQaeda? Certainly the influence of outside extremists, including alQaeda, has been increasing. That doesn't mean they directed the attack. Quote:
Quote:
-spence |
Quote:
I would hope in the Super Bowl O'reilly interview with our President, he would be asked, where were you, who were you with, and what was your response the night of the attack. I think the Administration's theme song is, "Time is on our side, yes it is, time is on our side" LOL,but really not funny. |
Quote:
Why is that so difficult to grasp? As for Stevens' perception of adequate protection and his responsibility of what happened, there's this: http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/201.../?subscriber=1 |
Quote:
Obama down played it and called it something else, more PC., forgot already! "Al Qaeda is on the run", pfft, Al Qaeda and it's tentacles, including similar and unattached groups, or as you say" a diaspora of groups" will be trying to do us in for the foreseeable future. It's their only goal. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com