Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   sh*thole countries (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=93207)

Jim in CT 01-12-2018 06:23 AM

sh*thole countries
 
Maybe the most appalling thing I have heard Trump say, and that's saying a lot.

I'd vote for him again over Hilary...but man oh man, that's not a good guy.

You can have a debate about the merits of allowing more immigrants who are self sufficient and fewer immigrants who have nothing, but to use that language in that setting...says a lot about him, and it doesn't say anything good.

If he could keep his damn mouth shut and just get populist stuff done, the GOP would be looking at a landslide in the midterms. I hope he doesn't run again. Hand it over to Pence and Nikki Haley.

scottw 01-12-2018 07:01 AM

I suspect the people leaving the countries he's referring to would agree with him...that's why they are leaving or attempting to

"an estimated 80 percent of Haitians live in absolute poverty."

Got Stripers 01-12-2018 08:04 AM

Make America white again, that's really what he meant to say during his campaign. Yesterday's comments by Trump are just another example of his white is right attitude and I just can't imagine working in his administration waiting for the next completely inappropriate comment or tweet knowing that you must shamelessly defend or twist what he said into something he really (yeah sure) meant.

Jim in CT 01-12-2018 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1134994)
I suspect the people leaving the countries he's referring to would agree with him...that's why they are leaving or attempting to

"an estimated 80 percent of Haitians live in absolute poverty."

I agree Haiti is a sh*thole country. But i think he said something like "why are we letting people in from these sh*thole countries". The answer to that, and it's sad that he doesn't already know this...is empathy.

Another acceptable answer would be, "because that's what America is about - opportunity".

Yet a third answer would be "we have sh*thole cities in America. People who come here from other sh*thole countries, are far more likely to become productive citizens and send their kids to medical school, than drug addicted welfare recipients currently living in Chicago. Because many immigrants come here and cannot believe how awesome it is, whereas people already here, take it for granted".

Jim in CT 01-12-2018 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Got Stripers (Post 1134997)
Make America white again, that's really what he meant to say during his campaign. Yesterday's comments by Trump are just another example of his white is right attitude and I just can't imagine working in his administration waiting for the next completely inappropriate comment or tweet knowing that you must shamelessly defend or twist what he said into something he really (yeah sure) meant.

Black unemployment is at an historical low. If he's a white supremacist, he's not a very good white supremacist.

He's an unbelievable jerk.

Slipknot 01-12-2018 09:08 AM

Archie Bunker

DZ 01-12-2018 09:16 AM

If he said it he needs to publicly apologize in a press conference. Uncalled for.

detbuch 01-12-2018 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1135000)
I agree Haiti is a sh*thole country. But i think he said something like "why are we letting people in from these sh*thole countries". The answer to that, and it's sad that he doesn't already know this...is empathy.

Immigration based on empathy is a formula which equates "empathy" with "self-destruction."

Another acceptable answer would be, "because that's what America is about - opportunity".

Opportunity is one of the benefits bestowed on the citizens of this country because of what America is "about"--freedom. We cannot bestow that benefit on the rest of the world. Freedom was bought at a bloody cost. Giving it to those who are not willing to fight for it, reduces its worth to its opposite--dependence.

Yet a third answer would be "we have sh*thole cities in America. People who come here from other sh*thole countries, are far more likely to become productive citizens and send their kids to medical school, than drug addicted welfare recipients currently living in Chicago. Because many immigrants come here and cannot believe how awesome it is, whereas people already here, take it for granted".

When we replace our sheithole citizens with immigrants, many of who are sheitholes, many of who are productive, we doom our sheitholes to permanent dependence instead of giving them a kick in their sheithole and making them produce or perish.

Immigration should not be based on nicely worded talking points. Accepting sheithole immigrants is stupid. Bringing in the cream of the crop from sheitholes deprives those holes of the very people they need to solve their sh*tty problems.

Jim in CT 01-12-2018 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slipknot (Post 1135003)
Archie Bunker

I think that's a great analogy. Except Trump is doing more to help the economy (which helps a huge number of us, not just the wealthy, and the media are ignoring that) than Archie Bunker ever could.

Jim in CT 01-12-2018 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1135008)
When we replace our sheithole citizens with immigrants, many of who are sheitholes, many of who are productive, we doom our sheitholes to permanent dependence instead of giving them a kick in their sheithole and making them produce or perish.

Immigration should not be based on nicely worded talking points. Accepting sheithole immigrants is stupid. Bringing in the cream of the crop from sheitholes deprives those holes of the very people they need to solve their sh*tty problems.

"Immigration based on empathy is a formula which equates "empathy" with "self-destruction."

I'm not following you. I wouldn't say we offer citizenship to every human being we happen to feel sorry for. What I am saying is that providing an opportunity for some people who were born unlucky, is noble, it's American, and it's the right thing to do, and I have no issue paying taxes to support it. I don't want to limit immigration to wealthy white people.



"We cannot bestow that benefit on the rest of the world"

I never heard anyone suggest we could. Trump seemed to suggest we shouldn't bestow it to people of color born in bad places. I'm sad to see you defending that.

"Giving it to those who are not willing to fight for it"

I don't know that immigrants are a lot less patriotic than the rest of us. The right kind of immigrant (poor through no fault of his own, who comes here and makes something of himself) has more reason to love this country than most of us. I'm not talking about Mexican illegals who come over to deal meth. I'm talking about, if I can stereotype, Asians and Indians who come here with nothing, and in one generation, their kids are in medical school. There's a lot of those people out there. That's who I want. They're not all white, they don't all currently live in Norway.

Maybe he didn't say what is being reported, it wouldn't be the first time the media lied to make him look bad. Nor would it be beyond him to say something that vile.

Nebe 01-12-2018 10:18 AM

I wanted to confirm this so I googled “trump , #^&#^&#^&#^&hole” . All I came up with were his hotel reviews.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

PaulS 01-12-2018 10:43 AM

The WH is not worried as a spokesman reportedly said that it will resonate w/Trump's base. Trump denies saying it. Durban basically calls him a liar.

Repub. leaders quite on this (not shocked at that). He did say Graham pushed back.

Maybe I'll go read an essay on how moral the Repub. are.

Nebe 01-12-2018 11:09 AM

that essay is basically just like how the Bible teaches morals, but with a lot of asterixs and the words “except if”.
Do on to others *except if they are gay, poor, or generally unlike you.

Help the poor *except if they are___________

Be non violent *except if they live in lands that hold great natural reaouces.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers 01-12-2018 11:22 AM

Trump should google famous immigrants who have made significant contributions in the USA, or maybe he would prefer there never was an Audubon society in the first place; throw that Haitian out.

I agree we need proper vetting, but I would hazard a guess some of these poor immigrants if given the opportunity will work and study their poor butts off and might be that one person who finally comes up with a cure for something we have been searching for for decades.

Cool Beans 01-12-2018 12:30 PM

I think all of our "Noble" liberals should go one step further. It's not fair if we take their people in, without doing something more to help these sheithole countries. I believe that all of our Noble and caring liberal friends should volunteer to do a 1 for 1 swap with the US, for every person we take in, we send them one highly qualified liberal or socialist to improve the sheithole country that the immigrant came from.

Or even better, also add to this, each immigrant is assigned a loving caring liberal sponsor to help them in their goal at becoming successful members of the community.

This would be a win win for everyone.
The sheithole countries immigrants can come here and be mentored properly to become contributing Democrat voters.
Our caring liberal friends feel better about themselves as they improve a sheithole country.
While the rest of us, can sit back and relax knowing that all of our liberal friends are out doing "the greater good" while we care to national defense and the economy

Pete F. 01-12-2018 12:35 PM

You need to watch "You've been Trumped" to learn how Trump thinks and how much he cares about others.
Just from another ****hole country, Scotland

Nebe 01-12-2018 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cool Beans (Post 1135019)
I think all of our "Noble" liberals should go one step further. It's not fair if we take their people in, without doing something more to help these sheithole countries. I believe that all of our Noble and caring liberal friends should volunteer to do a 1 for 1 swap with the US, for every person we take in, we send them one highly qualified liberal or socialist to improve the sheithole country that the immigrant came from.

Or even better, also add to this, each immigrant is assigned a loving caring liberal sponsor to help them in their goal at becoming successful members of the community.

This would be a win win for everyone.
The sheithole countries immigrants can come here and be mentored properly to become contributing Democrat voters.
Our caring liberal friends feel better about themselves as they improve a sheithole country.
While the rest of us, can sit back and relax knowing that all of our liberal friends are out doing "the greater good" while we care to national defense and the economy

Better yet. Why don’t you spend some time in a #^&#^&#^&#^&hole country. Learn to appreciate how you are viewed by the rest of the world and then if you can grasp empathy, perhaps you will understand the roots of terrorism and why terrorists attack innocent Americans
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

PaulS 01-12-2018 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebe (Post 1135023)
Better yet. Why don’t you spend some time in a #^&#^&#^&#^&hole country. Learn to appreciate how you are viewed by the rest of the world and then if you can grasp empathy, perhaps you will understand the roots of terrorism and why terrorists attack innocent Americans
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Usually eveyone just ignores him.

Pete F. 01-12-2018 01:25 PM

You guys better get to work if you don't want immigrants.
They typically have more kids.
I did my share, I have 5 kids all gainfully employed.
Paul Ryan’s recipe for a robust economy: Have more babies
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.cc3963004393

Cool Beans 01-12-2018 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebe (Post 1135023)
Better yet. Why don’t you spend some time in a #^&#^&#^&#^&hole country. Learn to appreciate how you are viewed by the rest of the world and then if you can grasp empathy, perhaps you will understand the roots of terrorism and why terrorists attack innocent Americans
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

20 years active duty navy, stationed in Japan for 6 years, completed three 6 month deployments to the Gulf and three 6 month deployments to South America. I have been to just about every country in South America and Asia. We as a country cannot feed and help the world by bringing their people to America. Our resources are finite and in the end all you will do is make the US just as bad.

We need to stop giving "handouts" and start giving jobs and opportunity. Want to immigrate to the US, we should have a job site, where people can view jobs and locations, apply for the job, get hired, pass a back ground check and poof, now you are a legal immigrant that is helping the country and not hindering it.

We are the "Land of Opportunity", not "Lactation Nation" where we breast feed you from cradle to grave. Try to feed the world and you will end up very dried up and sagging to your knees.

Immigration should be connected with employment and opportunity and not based entirely on charity.

Nebe 01-12-2018 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cool Beans (Post 1135032)
20 years active duty navy, stationed in Japan for 6 years, completed three 6 month deployments to the Gulf and three 6 month deployments to South America. I have been to just about every country in South America and Asia. We as a country cannot feed and help the world by bringing their people to America. Our resources are finite and in the end all you will do is make the US just as bad.

We need to stop giving "handouts" and start giving jobs and opportunity. Want to immigrate to the US, we should have a job site, where people can view jobs and locations, apply for the job, get hired, pass a back ground check and poof, now you are a legal immigrant that is helping the country and not hindering it.

We are the "Land of Opportunity", not "Lactation Nation" where we breast feed you from cradle to grave. Try to feed the world and you will end up very dried up and sagging to your knees.

Immigration should be connected with employment and opportunity and not based entirely on charity.

Thank you for your service. And yes, jobs would be nice. But wait. Done you want to make America great and do t those jobs need to be here in the US?

This is the conundrum.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Got Stripers 01-12-2018 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cool Beans (Post 1135032)
20 years active duty navy, stationed in Japan for 6 years, completed three 6 month deployments to the Gulf and three 6 month deployments to South America. I have been to just about every country in South America and Asia. We as a country cannot feed and help the world by bringing their people to America. Our resources are finite and in the end all you will do is make the US just as bad.

We need to stop giving "handouts" and start giving jobs and opportunity. Want to immigrate to the US, we should have a job site, where people can view jobs and locations, apply for the job, get hired, pass a back ground check and poof, now you are a legal immigrant that is helping the country and not hindering it.

We are the "Land of Opportunity", not "Lactation Nation" where we breast feed you from cradle to grave. Try to feed the world and you will end up very dried up and sagging to your knees.

Immigration should be connected with employment and opportunity and not based entirely on charity.

First, thanks for your service. I agree that immigration should be tied to jobs, value or education. I certainly agree we enable far too many in this country to just coast on the free ride, but while I don't know the percentages; I'd bet the majority of those freeloaders are born and breed right here. I agree with states tying medicaid to jobs or volunteer work, if you are able bodied you should be working for the free meal or housing.

This thread started out of disgust for the comments made by our super sensitive POTUS, I don't think we were talking about feeding the world. Helping a select group of motivated and smart individuals get out of their sh*thole countries to either help our economy or to get educated to return and help their country is smart and proactive on our part. The more educated and resourceful immigrants we return to help their sh*thole countries, the less of a burden they are to those countries assisting them financially or with relief efforts.

Cool Beans 01-12-2018 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nebe (Post 1135036)
Thank you for your service. And yes, jobs would be nice. But wait. Done you want to make America great and do t those jobs need to be here in the US?

This is the conundrum.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jobs and opportunity are good for Americans and legal immigrants alike.

If they are immigrating to the US, then yes the jobs should be in the US.

detbuch 01-12-2018 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1135011)
"Immigration based on empathy is a formula which equates "empathy" with "self-destruction."

I'm not following you. I wouldn't say we offer citizenship to every human being we happen to feel sorry for. What I am saying is that providing an opportunity for some people who were born unlucky, is noble, it's American, and it's the right thing to do, and I have no issue paying taxes to support it. I don't want to limit immigration to wealthy white people.

You said " The answer to that, and it's sad that he doesn't already know this...is empathy." You didn't qualify the word "empathy". So now you restrict it to not everyone we happen to feel sorry for. That is not helpful. Which ones who we feel sorry for should we empathize with? There are probably more born unlucky people in other countries than the entire population of the U.S.--several times over. What's so noble about picking and choosing which ones we will make lucky . . . and letting the rest stay luckless? What's so "right" about that? And why is that American? And if it is, when did it become so? Historically, from the inception of this country, immigration "policy" has been very selective and very limited--and there was no mention of "empathy" in it.


"We cannot bestow that benefit on the rest of the world"

I never heard anyone suggest we could. Trump seemed to suggest we shouldn't bestow it to people of color born in bad places. I'm sad to see you defending that.

You are not clear about what you suggest. You have not specified limits to empathy. It implied a suggestion, with your broad reason for immigration being "empathy," that we should indeed bestow our freedom on those who are unlucky.

As for your being sad about what you see as my defending (what Trump "seemed" to "suggest") discrimination against non-whites--I am a bit sad to see that you are drifting away from one of the things I admire about Catholicism--its historical scholasticism--that rigor of thought and clarity which did not impute undesirable words and thoughts to others when those words were not spoken. I realize that your "I don't want to limit immigration to wealthy white people" is your typical hyperbole. But I don't appreciate that you are implying, or actually saying, that I am defending racism.

The part of the world my ancestors came from was a main crossroad of conquests from Asia, the Middle East, northern and western Europe. I, no doubt, have the blood of many nations and races flowing through my veins.

And I live in Southwest Detroit, which is mostly Latino, and I cherish my Mexican neighbors. And my several black friends, in this basically black city, are a comfort and source of comradery.

And I don't have a patrimony or heritage of wealth, nor any personal ties or admiration for it, nor even a desire for it. Nor have I said or implied any defense of racism nor a preference for wealthy people. Neither do I dislike or disparage them.

So you needn't try to school me or scold me about a defense of racism.


"Giving it to those who are not willing to fight for it"

I don't know that immigrants are a lot less patriotic than the rest of us. The right kind of immigrant (poor through no fault of his own, who comes here and makes something of himself) has more reason to love this country than most of us. I'm not talking about Mexican illegals who come over to deal meth. I'm talking about, if I can stereotype, Asians and Indians who come here with nothing, and in one generation, their kids are in medical school. There's a lot of those people out there. That's who I want. They're not all white, they don't all currently live in Norway.

Maybe I don't have a reason to be sure, but I am sure that Trump wants those kind of people that you want as immigrants. What he doesn't want is massive thousands (of any kind) immigrating here within a vey short space of time, among whom would be many, if not a majority of those, especially from sh*thole countries, who do not fit the type you want. And it is very difficult to assimilate huge quantities of a type who come at the same time.

And he doesn't want, rightly so I think, chain migration. Do you?


Maybe he didn't say what is being reported, it wouldn't be the first time the media lied to make him look bad. Nor would it be beyond him to say something that vile.

You read racism into what he said. I suppose that is what makes it vile to you since you agree they came from, metaphorically, sh*thole countries. But he didn't specify or even mention race. You are a devout Catholic. Get back to your scholastic roots.

Pete F. 01-12-2018 02:08 PM

Immigration is not based entirely on charity.
https://www.wikihow.com/Immigrate-In...es-Permanently

The history behind family based immigration and how immigration works is pretty interesting.
If you do some genealogy and find out about your ancestry you might find out that the places they came from are not so nice either. Nobody emigrates because there is too much opportunity.
You can find some basics on Wikepedia and move on from there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor..._United_States

spence 01-12-2018 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1135041)
You read racism into what he said. I suppose that is what makes it vile to you since you agree they came from, metaphorically, sh*thole countries. But he didn't specify or even mention race. You are a devout Catholic. Get back to your scholastic roots.

You've used this deke before but it really doesn't work.

Jim in CT 01-12-2018 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1135041)
You read racism into what he said. I suppose that is what makes it vile to you since you agree they came from, metaphorically, sh*thole countries. But he didn't specify or even mention race. You are a devout Catholic. Get back to your scholastic roots.

"You didn't qualify the word "empathy". So now you restrict it to not everyone we happen to feel sorry for"

I have empathy for everyone born into the 3rd world. That doesn't mean I think we should bring them all here. The ones we do bring, we do so, because of empathy and hope.

"You are not clear about what you suggest"

I apologize. I'll try to clarify. I suggest that if Trump truly doesn't know why it's noble to bring some people from horrible places here, then he is a bigger jerk than I thought. And I thought he was a pretty big jerk.

"Historically, from the inception of this country, immigration "policy" has been very selective "

That's exactly true. Until, what, the Kennedy years?

"there was no mention of "empathy" in it."

Oh. So if the word isn't explicitly stated on an immigration document, then immigration policy cannot be based on empathy? I thought it was kind of obvious.

"What he doesn't want is massive thousands (of any kind) immigrating here within a vey short space of time, among whom would be many, if not a majority of those, especially from sh*thole countries, who do not fit the type 'you want"

That's not what he said. If he said "I don't want immigrants who won't be good neighbors", no one would take issue with that. No one. That's not what he said.

People cannot control what country they are born into. I'm not a huge fan of attacking people for things they did not choose, and have zero control over.

"You read racism into what he said"

Possibly racist in my opinion. I don't have a history of screaming racism every time someone I disagree with opens his mouth. It takes something to get me to that point. To assume that people from Norway are automatically superior to people from Africa and Haiti, isn't something I like coming out of the mouth of my POTUS. If he runs against Hilary again in 2020, I will once again have his sign on my lawn. But I thought this statement was deeply offensive.

I'm not even saying I'm opposed to being more selective in immigration, to bring people who are more likely to thrive and more likely to embrace our culture, I have no problem with that. He just sounded like a eugenicist. Let the liberals worship Margaret Sanger, I don't want that filth where I breathe.

detbuch 01-12-2018 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1135051)
You've used this deke before but it really doesn't work.

It was a fact, not deke.

Pete F. 01-12-2018 04:38 PM

I'll start off with my belief that of course we Norske are superior to everyone.
Now that I have that out of the way, I'll move on to the history of family entitlements. As i understand it in the 60s when the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was passed the ability to have your relatives follow you was added. At that time it was thought that would help mostly Europeans. Surprise it didn't work like that.

Raider Ronnie 01-12-2018 05:11 PM

I wonder if some of that Clinton Foundation $ found its way to Haiti as it was supposed to if the place would less of a shiithole 👀
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 01-12-2018 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1135053)
It was a fact, not deke.

People mix prejudice and racism all the time. To claim something isn't racism because you didn't explicitly mention the race is a distraction from the root issue...it's a deke.

detbuch 01-12-2018 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 1135058)
People mix prejudice and racism all the time. To claim something isn't racism because you didn't explicitly mention the race is a distraction from the root issue...it's a deke.

Too accuse someone of racism without factual evidence of it is the root method of the type of vague and prejudicial verbiage that you so often practice.

detbuch 01-12-2018 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1135052)
"You didn't qualify the word "empathy". So now you restrict it to not everyone we happen to feel sorry for"

I have empathy for everyone born into the 3rd world. That doesn't mean I think we should bring them all here. The ones we do bring, we do so, because of empathy and hope.

Empathy is a fine thing. Most of us empathize. But it cannot be a rational purpose for an immigration policy.

"You are not clear about what you suggest"

I apologize. I'll try to clarify. I suggest that if Trump truly doesn't know why it's noble to bring some people from horrible places here, then he is a bigger jerk than I thought. And I thought he was a pretty big jerk.

Where do you get that he doesn't know why it's noble? And is being noble another purpose besides empathy for an immigration policy?

"Historically, from the inception of this country, immigration "policy" has been very selective "

That's exactly true. Until, what, the Kennedy years?

Immigration and Nationality act of 1965--"It created a seven-category preference system, which gave priority to relatives of U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents and to professionals and other individuals with specialized skills." Still selective. And not based on empathy or nobility.

"there was no mention of "empathy" in it."

Oh. So if the word isn't explicitly stated on an immigration document, then immigration policy cannot be based on empathy? I thought it was kind of obvious.

The change in the 1965 immigration policy was to eliminate the preference for European immigrants, and to create a more "multicultural" society. It was not based on empathy or nobility. The immigration "problem" created by that change arose when amnesty was given to the millions of illegal "immigrants" here which not only brought about an unanticipated (by "Conservatives--maybe "liberals" did anticipate it) huge shift in demographics, especially when it was enhanced with chain migration. If you empathize with chain migration and think it is a noble thing, you're welcome to your opinion. I don't agree with such an opinion.

"What he doesn't want is massive thousands (of any kind) immigrating here within a vey short space of time, among whom would be many, if not a majority of those, especially from sh*thole countries, who do not fit the type 'you want"

That's not what he said. If he said "I don't want immigrants who won't be good neighbors", no one would take issue with that. No one. That's not what he said.

Nor did he say anything about race. He has said, at other times, similar things about immigration which you espouse.

People cannot control what country they are born into. I'm not a huge fan of attacking people for things they did not choose, and have zero control over.

When did he "attack" some because of the country they were born in?

"You read racism into what he said"

Possibly racist in my opinion. I don't have a history of screaming racism every time someone I disagree with opens his mouth. It takes something to get me to that point. To assume that people from Norway are automatically superior to people from Africa and Haiti, isn't something I like coming out of the mouth of my POTUS. If he runs against Hilary again in 2020, I will once again have his sign on my lawn. But I thought this statement was deeply offensive.

Was he referring to "whites" or to a compatible culture peopled by those who are far more likely to have the skill sets and attitudes that fit our needs then those raised in a sh*thole?

I'm not even saying I'm opposed to being more selective in immigration, to bring people who are more likely to thrive and more likely to embrace our culture, I have no problem with that. He just sounded like a eugenicist. Let the liberals worship Margaret Sanger, I don't want that filth where I breathe.

From what he has said about immigration at other times, it sounds that you and he are more in agreement than disagreement. You may be giving him more credit than he deserves for being scientifically inclined. I think business, not eugenics, is his wheelhouse and point of view. He certainly has not said he believed in eugenics.

Cool Beans 01-12-2018 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie (Post 1135057)
I wonder if some of that Clinton Foundation $ found its way to Haiti as it was supposed to if the place would less of a shiithole ��
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I read today today that a total of 6 homes were built with funds from the Clinton Foundation, cost was a little less than was spent on Chelsea's wedding

Raider Ronnie 01-12-2018 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cool Beans (Post 1135064)
I read today today that a total of 6 homes were built with funds from the Clinton Foundation, cost was a little less than was spent on Chelsea's wedding



You ask me this website has become a ShiitHole ever since this political forum was added.
Not a day goes by there’s no political post & replies and nothing about fishing
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Cool Beans 01-12-2018 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie (Post 1135065)
You ask me this website has become a ShiitHole ever since this political forum was added.
Not a day goes by there’s no political post & replies and nothing about fishing
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Well there is that one thread in the Ice Fishing section that has been ok. Seen a few good pictures of bass and some big trout on there. And I enjoy seeing some of those beautiful flies that SaltyDog posts.

Sometimes this political forum reminds me to much of the comment sections on all the online news sites. The fish don't care who you voted for. I would bet that more than a few fishing friendships or possible friendships have been soured or prevented by this forum alone.

Jim in CT 01-12-2018 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1135061)
From what he has said about immigration at other times, it sounds that you and he are more in agreement than disagreement. You may be giving him more credit than he deserves for being scientifically inclined. I think business, not eugenics, is his wheelhouse and point of view. He certainly has not said he believed in eugenics.

"Empathy is a fine thing. Most of us empathize. But it cannot be a rational purpose for an immigration policy."

The Battle Hymn Of The Republic says, I think, "as He died to make men holy, let us die to set them free". If empathy for people is a valid reason to go to war, surely it's enough of a reason to let some people come here.

"Where do you get that he doesn't know why it's noble? "

He asked why we are bringing in people from these countries? That tells me, he doesn't currently know why we would want to do it.

"If you empathize with chain migration and think it is a noble thing, you're welcome to your opinion. I don't agree with such an opinion."

I think I agree with you on that one. Being related to someone who is here, isn't a good enough reason, in and of itself.

"it sounds that you and he are more in agreement than disagreement"

I would bet you are probably right. I agree with most of his policy agenda. It's just that his choice of wording, is so unnecessarily offensive. Who would deny that Haiti is a sh*thole country?

I agree that these are sh*thole countries. They are beyond dysfunctional, horribly run, and causing immeasurable despair. But that's exactly why I want to bring some people from those places. People in Norway aren't tortured to death for speaking against the government, they don't need our help.

"You may be giving him more credit than he deserves for being scientifically inclined"

You re probably right on that score, as well.

The other aspect of this that angers me, is about domestic politics. Because of the economy, and because of which senators are up for re-election in November, what the democrats should be talking about, is whether or not the GOP will win unanimously in November. But because of this guy's inability to keep from saying godawful things, if the elections were today, the democrats would probably re-take the house. I don't want that nutjob Pelosi as speaker of the House again, and Trump is making that more likely, and I just can't stand it.

spence 01-12-2018 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cool Beans (Post 1135064)
I read today today that a total of 6 homes were built with funds from the Clinton Foundation, cost was a little less than was spent on Chelsea's wedding

Oh good lord.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

nightfighter 01-12-2018 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider Ronnie (Post 1135065)
You ask me this website has become a ShiitHole ever since this political forum was added.
Not a day goes by there’s no political post & replies and nothing about fishing
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Agreed. I come here to check for new posts. See none other than this forum. Go over to other site for stuff to read about fishing or the tavern...

Cool Beans 01-12-2018 09:27 PM

I always find it odd, how it's always someone says they heard or a he said she said crap. I work in the government and every meeting there is someone taking notes or recording the meeting for others to view later. It's just weird to have no record of what was actually said or not.

And besides the point, who cares if he said, shiithole countries. Trump is a capitalist and isnt thinking like a racist, he is purely thinking it is economically smarter to be more careful where we accept the most immigrants from. I have not been to Haiti, but I have been to Peru, Ecuador, Shri Lanka, Papua New Guinea, Malaysia, Philippines, and Indonesia to name a few of the countries that I would call shiithole countries. Many of the people there are great, friendly and hard working, but their government policies and economic hardships make them shiithole countries. I believe that it wouldnt be a bad idea to accept immigrants from all or most all countries, with them all having similar limits on how many. If we have a limit of 500 from Sweden then Mexico should have the same 500 with the same requirements for employability and such. Shiithole countries are not necessarily filled with shiiity people. If we accept them then we should ensure they have the ability to succeed and not just let them all in. By limiting them and making certain requirements we help both them and America.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com