I,m back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

ya cant fish! :yak:

Fish on!
 

in the back of my truck!

Nice schoolies---bigger one's all of 32" :faga:

Good Grillin' Size

Wish I had kept some of those the other night, well, two of 'em anyway

JohnR....Great Avatar :kewl:

Nice dinks...:tm:

Liking the avatar JR:kewl:

Neither can you. Let the little ones grow.

:bl2::bl2::bl2:

I think it's time for a vacation from this site. We're putting back 30 lb fish and guys a posting pictures of 30 INCH fish?

John, perhaps it's time for some quality control on posting pics again. This time NO DINKS!!!!

LOL, He doesn't realize guys aren't as tolerant here as they are over there...:poke:

What's wrong with posting pics of fish? There's got to be a size limit now?

If you follow his posts over there you'd know. Mike calls em all 30#ers :hihi:

Scott, you know me better than that.

I just don't think people should be killing 28" fish. It's his right, I know. But don't publicize.

Considering the season I'm having I'll be killing my next 28" fish...and enjoying it served barely cooked :hf1:

-spence

over there
 

Over there.......:devil2:

is of no consequence

it is of no importance

over there matters not....

it is de nada........

and WHY NOT??? Perhaps killing 30's and 40's that are probably stronger breeders is better?

I kill for the table, and it's my preference to eat smaller fish, under 20 lbs. Now don't get me wrong, I see no point to bragging about catching small keepers...

the law says 2 at 28"....that's what I'll take and keep if I catch them...but I guess I won't be posting that here....lol

where is over there?.
so out of the loop.

You can make the acronym for it out of the beginning letters in your last sentence, if you throw out the t and one of the o's ;)

People can post any fish pictures they feel are worth seeing. Sometimes people just want to share a good time , size of fish doesn't matter.

I would rather keep and eat a 28" striper, for one they taste better then the big ones and secondley I feel I would be taking away from a good gene pool by keeping the bigger ones.

Sorry--but I've had my fill of this guy on the other site, where he uses a different handle.

His buds like him--I find his act tiresome. Did you guys overlook the "ya cant fish" part of it?

To each their own. :huh:

I'm in full agreement Mike.:doh:

Jealousy does not become you :heybaby: The guy is a legend.

What happened, the 40 pounders broke you off again? :doh:

Never heard of him...

Nothing is wrong with posting legal pictures of bass legally heading for the table. If you don't like it, show up at the meetings and try to get the size changed...

On the other hand, a self described judge of others' fishing capabilities would have a little more cred posting large fish (possibly being released) instead of some barely legals before shouting "Ya Can't Fish"

:musc:

is this the same guy that just posted a photo over there of a 50" fish caught 8/29/07 but he didnt brag about it until he entered it in a contest a week later?

I was totally kidding. Ditch/Mike P is the best IMO.

RockHoppingMike or RHM is quite a character. :hihi:

Clown is the word for it....:spin:

Yeah, the "50 inch" fish with a metal tape stretched over it, with about a one inch high kink in the tape at the 39" mark? :D:rotflmao::hs:

I think that's the guy.

I Can't Fish!
 

:hee::fishslap:

I got to laugh at this guy, if he didn't come out bragging it would be a different story. I've seen plenty of shorty pics but it's the story behind the fish that makes the fish in my opinion. All of my posted fish have been less than 32 but I didn't post the story with guns a blazing about how great I was. Quite the opposite in fact. Oh and by the way I'm still looking for the keeper for 07' and the clock is ticking!




http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripert...9&d=1185045528