![]() |
Tea Party/ GOP-
Meeting today. I have a feeling if the GOP doesn't accept and incorporate
the Tea Party movement there will be a third party. Whether Dem or Repub, they are in trouble if they don't listen to the people. I give the Tea Party a lot of credit for getting more people involved in the governmental process. |
There is a lot of incumbant anger and if the GOP can work with the them, it is obviously to their benefit. However, the TP aren't going to walk in step w/them.
|
The tea party needs to distance itself from the nuts. I agree with what the tea party stands for but you have the Obama = Hitler crowd mixed in and they will diminish any value.
|
they must eliminate the lunatic fringe, and soon.
|
Quote:
|
What would you guys consider a TP wing nuts philosophy would be?
|
Quote:
http://www.jeffhead.com/912teaparty/...arty-DC-12.jpg http://newsbusters.org/static/2009/0...ea%20Party.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2602/...fe9665.jpg?v=0 And my favorite: http://jgogek.files.wordpress.com/20...a-party-42.jpg |
Thanks, JD. When I read Justplugit's post, the first image that popped into my mind was one of a woman with a "Teabagging for Jesus" sign at one of the prostests. Of course the far right wing extremists, racists and those advocating violence are a very small number in the grand scheme of things, but they get the most attention. That's what I originally meant by "wingnuts".
|
Quote:
|
spell check needed:
http://wysinger.homestead.com/tex3.jpg http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-...ads/morans.jpg not only needs spell check, but maybe slightly rascist :rolleyes: http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesau...erobertson.jpg OK, and that car is US made too? http://wysinger.homestead.com/610xCAIATMKI.jpg |
Quote:
The fruitloop that Delahunt let go to murder 3 people in Alabama was a big time Obama supporter. The press and JD and the left would like you to believe the Tea Party is all nut jobs (hence the handy pics that JD put up) but it really is a mistake to assume that. |
Quote:
This isn't like a picture book where you get the whole story by just flipping through the pages and looking at the pretty pictures. |
Quote:
The problem the Tea Party will have is that the GOP is going to use them publicly, but not really embrace them as a movement within the party. Their defacto leader, Sarah Palin is...well, enough said :hihi: -spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't see any policy from them though, aside from Palin's "common sense" approach to everything. You know, if you have a problem apply a common sense solution :yak5: -spence |
The same people that overestimated Obama are now underestimating this movement.
People are fed up and though they may not belong to the "Tea Party" they have similar values and motivations when it comes to who they will be voting for or shall I say out. Give the Dems credit...they sure can eff it up for themselfs when put in charge. |
another Dem bites the dust.....so Browns win was not that big a deal, huh?
|
From what I've seen of the Tea Party gatherings on TV I never saw one
person carrying the signs any thing like JD posted. I'm sure their opposition went out of their way to snap those. The majority of what I saw was groups of older Americans demonstrating peacefully against HC, higher taxes, smaller G and run away spending by both parties over the last few years that would create unpayable debt for their kids and grand-kids for generations. Awakened a lot of people. Oh yeah and Spence your [QUOTE]:, "if you have a problem, apply a common sense solution.:yak5:. " What we need really is some theory spun by a bunch of know it all egg head professors with little or no experience that never stepped into the real world, to give us solutions and spend our money.:rolleyes: |
:hihi: jpi..all you watch is Beck, Hannity, and O'Really...
on Faux News.... of course they gonna pretty it up for youse...:hihi: change the channel once in a while, or better yet, get that motorcycle running again! |
Quote:
get it on the road is a little tougher at my age. :hihi: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
:hihi:
|
Quote:
|
They're the right wing version of Ralph Nader - they will be harmless to the opposition, but split the conservative vote and weaken the base.
|
Quote:
-spence |
Quote:
The majority of Americans are conservative, not wing nuts. America woke up post Bush-sucks to find out that Change means - tax and spend. They want the government out of their lives, they want the government to stop spending, they want a president to stop "selling" and start doing! They dont like to be talked down to! Wake up boys - the times they are a changing. Latest CNN poll - majority of Americans WOULD NOT VOTE TO RELECT OBAMA ! |
Quote:
|
let me get this straight...the current President of the United States has had known close associations with a radical domestic terrorist among others and has a plethera of radicals currently strolling the halls of the White House...and that's not a problem?...but a couple of people show up at a Tea Party rally with questionable signs and the entire movement is discredited...this is just like watching MSNBC:uhuh:
|
Quote:
But... how many republicans are retiring or not running for reelection so far in 2010... I thought I read somewhere it was about 50/50 on the split. A gauntlet was thrown with the energy legislation Obama is proposing. If the republicans fight what they pushed for just on political prinicipal (Drill baby drill!) then they are are definitely going to look like the party of no. If they do this, then they are going to loose any momentum the party might have gained from Scott Brown... for the record, I as a tree-hugging, climate change believing sediment worker, am: 1. Pro Nuke 2. anti offshore drilling 3. Undecided on 'clean' coal... |
OK, I'm wrong. The Tea Party will not harm repubs by creating a split among hard right conservatives, but rather it will take votes from the democrats.
|
Quote:
Also, you (and just about everyone else) have pretty consistently made the Scott Brown vote a "Vote against the Democrats" and I disagree. I think the Scott Brown win included a perfect storm of factors - a weak Dem candidate, a horribly run campaign, Brown's lack of fitting the Washington mold and having that hometown appearance. (and yes, dissent of the Dems but not as the sole reason). |
I'm surprised that people are acting like the rise of counter movement in the face of liberal hegemony is something new. That the recent rise of a Tea Party-like organization was not predictable, and that this represents a sea-change in American Politics. Cripes, South Carolina has not even seceded yet.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. I can kill healthcare bill (you remember, Obama's key priority) 2. I am against giving rights to terrorsts (you remember, Obama pushed for trials of 9/11 suspects) 3. Less government (you remember, everything Obama has done in offce) So in a state that was predominatly for OBAMA, the Brown vote was not a vote against Dems, although he stood opposite EVERYTHING they stood for? :wall: |
Quote:
you do know that many of the key orgainziers are housewives and career women? Uh, yeah, they've been an organized voice in american politics. You guys are blind, blind to the facts cuz your watchin that garbage (bonus points to who can name the source of that quote) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com