Hillary for prison 2016
 

Lol
http://news.yahoo.com/second-judge-s...195003177.html
Referring to the State Department, Clinton and Clinton's aides, he said there had been "constantly shifting admissions by the Government and the former government officials." Spokesmen for Clinton did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

I wonder why the FBI has requested the State department to stop it's investigation. Could it be to protect evidence or part of a cover up?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, it's just their standard process to slot independent investigations until after the FBI is complete.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I see how you left out investigation after FBI..LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Already said investigation before, didn't need to be redundant.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i relish seeing her in jail bird orange

lying pos

I was just reading that she is polling nearly as poorly among women as the Trumpster is...

not investigation..."witch hunt"....seriously

currently working for the government and if I had even 1 of her emails, especially the TS and above, I would be writing this from my cell......

There is NO excuse for this, but with her position, just like it has happened in the recent past, she will get prosecuted, slapped on the wrist or pardoned.

It is amazing that both parties have decided to put forth such crappy candidates.

It's like trying to choose a restaurant and realizing that all of the restaurants are taco bell. You can choose greasy tacos or greasy burritos, but no matter what you choose you will have the craps for 4 years........

Best post I've read in a while here, including my own! It is unbelievable.

This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why don't you tell that to the FBI. How in the world does the government function without your expertise. Not that you will show you are unbiased but just for Chita and giggles is there an FBI investigation or not. I don't think your brain will allow you to type the words.......FBI investigating Hilary.
3 words..
. can you bring yourself to put those words together or not.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And that seems fair to me.

However, I believe it has been argued that some of the emails were flagged as classified, then had the flags removed, before she sent them to her personal server. From what I understand, which isn't a lot, she couldn't send emails flagged as TS, to her personal email from her work account...unless the flag was removed before it was sent.

We'll see.

This is the only reason she hasn't been prosecuted already.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What people keep forgetting is that if an email is labeled secret it stays on a network that holds that classification. In order for it to wind up on a non classified system it actually has to be physically copied to some sort of removable media and brought over to a non classified system so it could be emailed out.

A whole lot of intent to dis-regard and bypass security. It's not just an "Oops I hit the wrong key on my keyboard" moment.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That's what I was trying to get at.

So every email on her server was necessarily "un-classified" at the time it was sent. Some were retroactively classified, and I don't know that you can argue she committed a crime regarding these.

The other possibility, as you suggested, is that there were some emails that were flagged, but had the flagged removed, so the emails could be forwarded to her server. If someone removed the classification flags just so they could then be sent to her server, that person likely committed a crime. I imagine that's part of the investigation thingy that is is not looking at Hilary.

Absolutely correct....:)

All Top Secret and above information is classified upon creation. There is no time that it is not classified as such. It can only be read or accessed inside of secured locations on secured systems of that level. You can't even discus these items outside of secured and approved locations. There is no wiggle room.

Kinda like that but Even if the classification label is removed , it still can't be forwarded to an unsecure system because there is no physical connection between the two. You literally have to move it yourself onto the unsecure network so you can email it....via CD or Memory stick or something comparable.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I have yet to see any reporting that suggests this happened.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The FBI is investigating handling of information, not the person.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Not if it's classified retroactively.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

For what?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So it requires one more act of commission, quite possibly a criminal act of commission. Gotcha.

All Top Secret and above information is classified UPON CREATION.

Never mind, I give up Spence, you win!

Somehow she innocently imagined up Top Secret information in her pretty little head and then sent it on her personal computer.

When Hillary poops it smells like roses and peppermint!

:uhuh:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, the only reason is this one: Clinton

Had it been anyone else, the legal proceedings would be underway.

Not true.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No evidence of this Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes there is, and we have discussed this. There were at least 2 classified emails, flagged as classified, that made their way to her server. In order to make their way to her server, the flags had to have been removed. The intelligence in question was not generated by the State Dept, and only the agency that produced the intelligence, has the authority to remove the flag. Her defense of that, was her claim (I am trying to remember), something about the fact that what was in teh email, had been reported in the NY Times already?

Anyway, the FBI is part of the DOJ, which is headed by an OBama appointee. And they decided there was reason to spend a lot of time and manpower looking into this. They aren't doing it because Sean Hannity asked them to do it. But naturally, you know more about their procedures than anyone else...

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-state-secrets

"Clinton’s flimsy claim never to have handled e-mails labeled classified imploded recently when an e-mail sent June 17, 2011, became public. That morning, Clinton’s aide Jacob Sullivan informed her that a document could not reach her via a secure fax. No sweat! Clinton replied, “ . . . turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” So, Clinton knew about these classified markings and, even worse, instructed her staffer to cover them up and forward her that document via a fax machine vulnerable to spies. Clinton’s “gross negligence” may have violated the federal Espionage Act, 18 U.S. Code § 793."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

But if Hillary says she didn't do anything that should be good enough for everybody...

I mean Bill Cosby didn't do anything wrong.....it was those other 100+ women making crap up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Meanwhile, thanks to you, "the narrative" just tried to commit suicide.

We've discussed this. The request was for unclassified talking points contained within a document on the classified system. That on its on is no indication of wrongdoing by anyone. I'd note the requested information was never even sent via email.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

She said to fax it, but you probably know better than Hillary what she said...oops I mean what she said in her email. Almost seems as though you hacked her emails also.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Newsflash......if it's on a classified system...it's a classified document. Until it has been OK'd for release from said system.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

From what the State Department has said you will find unclassified information on the classified system and that doesn't mean it's illegal to talk about it.

Then again, the State Department review says the incident reported never happened regardless.

So I guess we should hold Clinton to a standard where she's liable for retroactive classification and emails that weren't even ever sent. Nice.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You will find unclassified on a classified system......but once it gets put on the classified system.....it is not allowed to leave without approval.....and Hillary is not the person allowed to provide that approval

I expect to hold Hillary to the same standards that everybody is held to who deals with classified material.....she's not exempt from proper security practices
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

My bad I guess.....I should have said it is "Considered" a classified document.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device