Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home Register FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-29-2016, 04:43 PM   #1
ecduzitgood
time to go
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
Hillary for prison 2016

Lol
http://news.yahoo.com/second-judge-s...195003177.html
Referring to the State Department, Clinton and Clinton's aides, he said there had been "constantly shifting admissions by the Government and the former government officials." Spokesmen for Clinton did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
ecduzitgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2016, 10:24 AM   #2
ecduzitgood
time to go
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
I wonder why the FBI has requested the State department to stop it's investigation. Could it be to protect evidence or part of a cover up?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
ecduzitgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2016, 10:29 AM   #3
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecduzitgood View Post
I wonder why the FBI has requested the State department to stop it's investigation. Could it be to protect evidence or part of a cover up?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
No, it's just their standard process to slot independent investigations until after the FBI is complete.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2016, 10:32 AM   #4
ecduzitgood
time to go
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
No, it's just their standard process to slot independent investigations until after the FBI is complete.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I see how you left out investigation after FBI..LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
ecduzitgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2016, 10:52 AM   #5
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecduzitgood View Post
I see how you left out investigation after FBI..LOL
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Already said investigation before, didn't need to be redundant.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 04:57 AM   #6
Raven
........
iTrader: (0)
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,690
Blog Entries: 1
i relish seeing her in jail bird orange
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 05:23 AM   #7
Raider Ronnie
www.blackhullcharters.com
iTrader: (0)
 
Raider Ronnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On my boat
Posts: 8,949
Send a message via AIM to Raider Ronnie
lying pos
Raider Ronnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 07:05 AM   #8
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,619
I was just reading that she is polling nearly as poorly among women as the Trumpster is...
scottw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 07:07 AM   #9
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Already said investigation before, didn't need to be redundant.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
not investigation..."witch hunt"....seriously
scottw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 07:10 AM   #10
Cool Beans
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Cool Beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 847
currently working for the government and if I had even 1 of her emails, especially the TS and above, I would be writing this from my cell......

There is NO excuse for this, but with her position, just like it has happened in the recent past, she will get prosecuted, slapped on the wrist or pardoned.

It is amazing that both parties have decided to put forth such crappy candidates.

It's like trying to choose a restaurant and realizing that all of the restaurants are taco bell. You can choose greasy tacos or greasy burritos, but no matter what you choose you will have the craps for 4 years........
Cool Beans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 07:22 AM   #11
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans View Post
It is amazing that both parties have decided to put forth such crappy candidates.

.......
Best post I've read in a while here, including my own! It is unbelievable.
Jim in CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 08:37 AM   #12
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans View Post
currently working for the government and if I had even 1 of her emails, especially the TS and above, I would be writing this from my cell......
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 08:41 AM   #13
ecduzitgood
time to go
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Why don't you tell that to the FBI. How in the world does the government function without your expertise. Not that you will show you are unbiased but just for Chita and giggles is there an FBI investigation or not. I don't think your brain will allow you to type the words.......FBI investigating Hilary.
3 words..
. can you bring yourself to put those words together or not.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
ecduzitgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 08:53 AM   #14
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
And that seems fair to me.

However, I believe it has been argued that some of the emails were flagged as classified, then had the flags removed, before she sent them to her personal server. From what I understand, which isn't a lot, she couldn't send emails flagged as TS, to her personal email from her work account...unless the flag was removed before it was sent.

We'll see.
Jim in CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 08:57 AM   #15
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: newpawht
Posts: 19,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
This is the only reason she hasn't been prosecuted already.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 09:02 AM   #16
The Dad Fisherman
Super Moderator
iTrader: (0)
 
The Dad Fisherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 15,692
What people keep forgetting is that if an email is labeled secret it stays on a network that holds that classification. In order for it to wind up on a non classified system it actually has to be physically copied to some sort of removable media and brought over to a non classified system so it could be emailed out.

A whole lot of intent to dis-regard and bypass security. It's not just an "Oops I hit the wrong key on my keyboard" moment.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
The Dad Fisherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 09:12 AM   #17
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman View Post
What people keep forgetting is that if an email is labeled secret it stays on a network that holds that classification. In order for it to wind up on a non classified system it actually has to be physically copied to some sort of removable media and brought over to a non classified system so it could be emailed out.

A whole lot of intent to dis-regard and bypass security. It's not just an "Oops I hit the wrong key on my keyboard" moment.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
That's what I was trying to get at.

So every email on her server was necessarily "un-classified" at the time it was sent. Some were retroactively classified, and I don't know that you can argue she committed a crime regarding these.

The other possibility, as you suggested, is that there were some emails that were flagged, but had the flagged removed, so the emails could be forwarded to her server. If someone removed the classification flags just so they could then be sent to her server, that person likely committed a crime. I imagine that's part of the investigation thingy that is is not looking at Hilary.
Jim in CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 09:31 AM   #18
Fly Rod
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Fly Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gloucester Massachusetts
Posts: 2,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman View Post
What people keep forgetting is that if an email is labeled secret it stays on a network that holds that classification. In order for it to wind up on a non classified system it actually has to be physically copied to some sort of removable media and brought over to a non classified system so it could be emailed out.

A whole lot of intent to dis-regard and bypass security. It's not just an "Oops I hit the wrong key on my keyboard" moment.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Absolutely correct....

"When its not about money,it's all about money."...
Fly Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 10:33 AM   #19
Cool Beans
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Cool Beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 847
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
All Top Secret and above information is classified upon creation. There is no time that it is not classified as such. It can only be read or accessed inside of secured locations on secured systems of that level. You can't even discus these items outside of secured and approved locations. There is no wiggle room.
Cool Beans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 11:28 AM   #20
The Dad Fisherman
Super Moderator
iTrader: (0)
 
The Dad Fisherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 15,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
That's what I was trying to get at.

So every email on her server was necessarily "un-classified" at the time it was sent. Some were retroactively classified, and I don't know that you can argue she committed a crime regarding these.

The other possibility, as you suggested, is that there were some emails that were flagged, but had the flagged removed, so the emails could be forwarded to her server. If someone removed the classification flags just so they could then be sent to her server, that person likely committed a crime. I imagine that's part of the investigation thingy that is is not looking at Hilary.
Kinda like that but Even if the classification label is removed , it still can't be forwarded to an unsecure system because there is no physical connection between the two. You literally have to move it yourself onto the unsecure network so you can email it....via CD or Memory stick or something comparable.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
The Dad Fisherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 11:30 AM   #21
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman View Post
What people keep forgetting is that if an email is labeled secret it stays on a network that holds that classification. In order for it to wind up on a non classified system it actually has to be physically copied to some sort of removable media and brought over to a non classified system so it could be emailed out.

A whole lot of intent to dis-regard and bypass security. It's not just an "Oops I hit the wrong key on my keyboard" moment.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I have yet to see any reporting that suggests this happened.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 11:31 AM   #22
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecduzitgood View Post
Why don't you tell that to the FBI. How in the world does the government function without your expertise. Not that you will show you are unbiased but just for Chita and giggles is there an FBI investigation or not. I don't think your brain will allow you to type the words.......FBI investigating Hilary.
3 words..
. can you bring yourself to put those words together or not.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
The FBI is investigating handling of information, not the person.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 11:33 AM   #23
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans View Post
All Top Secret and above information is classified upon creation. There is no time that it is not classified as such. It can only be read or accessed inside of secured locations on secured systems of that level. You can't even discus these items outside of secured and approved locations. There is no wiggle room.
Not if it's classified retroactively.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 11:33 AM   #24
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe View Post
This is the only reason she hasn't been prosecuted already.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
For what?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:08 PM   #25
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman View Post
Kinda like that but Even if the classification label is removed , it still can't be forwarded to an unsecure system because there is no physical connection between the two. You literally have to move it yourself onto the unsecure network so you can email it....via CD or Memory stick or something comparable.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
So it requires one more act of commission, quite possibly a criminal act of commission. Gotcha.
Jim in CT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:25 PM   #26
Cool Beans
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Cool Beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 847
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Not if it's classified retroactively.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
All Top Secret and above information is classified UPON CREATION.

Never mind, I give up Spence, you win!

Somehow she innocently imagined up Top Secret information in her pretty little head and then sent it on her personal computer.

When Hillary poops it smells like roses and peppermint!

Last edited by Cool Beans; 04-04-2016 at 12:44 PM..
Cool Beans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 01:47 PM   #27
The Dad Fisherman
Super Moderator
iTrader: (0)
 
The Dad Fisherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 15,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
So it requires one more act of commission, quite possibly a criminal act of commission. Gotcha.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
The Dad Fisherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 03:20 PM   #28
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 31,731
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe View Post
This is the only reason she hasn't been prosecuted already.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
No, the only reason is this one: Clinton

Had it been anyone else, the legal proceedings would be underway.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 03:29 PM   #29
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans View Post
All Top Secret and above information is classified UPON CREATION.
Not true.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 03:31 PM   #30
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 16,885
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
So it requires one more act of commission, quite possibly a criminal act of commission. Gotcha.
No evidence of this Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com