| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
04-04-2016, 08:37 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans
currently working for the government and if I had even 1 of her emails, especially the TS and above, I would be writing this from my cell......
|
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 08:41 AM
|
#2
|
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Why don't you tell that to the FBI. How in the world does the government function without your expertise. Not that you will show you are unbiased but just for Chita and giggles is there an FBI investigation or not. I don't think your brain will allow you to type the words.......FBI investigating Hilary.
3 words..
. can you bring yourself to put those words together or not.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 11:31 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecduzitgood
Why don't you tell that to the FBI. How in the world does the government function without your expertise. Not that you will show you are unbiased but just for Chita and giggles is there an FBI investigation or not. I don't think your brain will allow you to type the words.......FBI investigating Hilary.
3 words..
. can you bring yourself to put those words together or not.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
The FBI is investigating handling of information, not the person.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 08:53 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
And that seems fair to me.
However, I believe it has been argued that some of the emails were flagged as classified, then had the flags removed, before she sent them to her personal server. From what I understand, which isn't a lot, she couldn't send emails flagged as TS, to her personal email from her work account...unless the flag was removed before it was sent.
We'll see. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 08:57 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,710
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
This is the only reason she hasn't been prosecuted already.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 11:33 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
This is the only reason she hasn't been prosecuted already.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
For what?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 10:33 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
This is not true. Under US law you can not be prosecuted for mishandling information retroactively classified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
All Top Secret and above information is classified upon creation. There is no time that it is not classified as such. It can only be read or accessed inside of secured locations on secured systems of that level. You can't even discus these items outside of secured and approved locations. There is no wiggle room. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 11:33 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans
All Top Secret and above information is classified upon creation. There is no time that it is not classified as such. It can only be read or accessed inside of secured locations on secured systems of that level. You can't even discus these items outside of secured and approved locations. There is no wiggle room.
|
Not if it's classified retroactively.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 12:25 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Not if it's classified retroactively.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
All Top Secret and above information is classified UPON CREATION.
Never mind, I give up Spence, you win!
Somehow she innocently imagined up Top Secret information in her pretty little head and then sent it on her personal computer.
When Hillary poops it smells like roses and peppermint!
Last edited by Cool Beans; 04-04-2016 at 12:44 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2016, 03:29 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans
All Top Secret and above information is classified UPON CREATION.
|
Not true.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode