![]() |
Mid term elections....
Now that they are over and the Democratic Party has both the House and Senate do you think they can get the job done? So many issues but the main one as we all know is Iraq.
How do we get out without the country falling into civil chaos and bloodshed of an unimaginable scale? We have to finish what we unfortunately started, how the hell do we do that? Now that Rumsfeld, although very belatedly, has been fired and the officer corps of our armed forces are jumping for joy down the hallways of the Pentagon, do you think the new DS elect will let the military run the ground offensive there or not and will he listen to there advice? McNamara, is who I hold solely responsible for the war in VietNam getting so F*cked up and taking my brother's life, ran the show in the same way Rumsfeld did, it only took 30 years for him to realize how wrong he was. Even Pres. Johnson wanted to get out and knew it was a no win situation but he let McNamara go on as Bush did with Donny. How will this all play out? Any thoughts? |
As far as I'm concerned the goals of the war were achieved quite some time ago. The task left at hand is to create an Internal Iraqi Security force capable of securing their own country. Hopefully with Rumsfelds departure that process can be expedited. The only thing for sure is an immediate withdrawal with no concern for the potential consequences would be a huge mistake.
|
Quote:
couldnt have said it better myself. |
Quote:
Despite the heroic efforts of our fighting men and women we're still a long way from achieving this goal. -spence |
Quote:
Bottom line is the people have spoken. I think in the long run this purge will be a good thing. I like it because many of the democrats that were elected are known as being fiscally and socially conservative, which is exactly what I am. Unfortunately, I have a strong suspicion that with Pelosi and Rangel in positions of power and with the democratic party in control of congress there will be a lot more impetus to conduct investigations, issue subpoenas and hold hearings to vilify the current administration. I have a feeling that with the blind hate many democrats have for the Bush crowd, that the focus will shift from the "mess" that is Iraq to the fufillment of personal vendettas. We shall see. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What you see as a "vendetta" I see as personal accountability. I used to think that Republicans stood for that...perhaps it's why so many fled the GOP this time around. -spence |
I almost threw up reading the projo this morning. There was a fluff piece on Pelosi how she is a "moderate" democrat! :yak6: Who are these people trying to fool? How can a San Fran Liberal be a freakin' moderate.
And i just loved the piece on how america voted "liberal" They made the argument that because Arizona voted for gay marriage the entire country somehow is coming around to that view. I think someone forgot to tell them that every other state that had that question on the ballet rejected it! And in previous elections the same thing. But no, america supports this crap now becuase of ONE state?? WTF? :confused: Liberalism is gonna be jammed down our throat the next two years, so get ready. Its starting already..... |
Quote:
|
Skippy, didn't you hear?
The first Bill of the Pelosi Congress has already been proposed Quote:
|
Quote:
I am not the only person who is extremely interested in seeing what plans this new congress has to cure the ills it has highlighted. There was a lot of rhetoric about getting out of Iraq, and exit strategies during these campaigns without an actual plan ever being set out. I wait with great anticipation. |
It's always frightening to see the enemys of the United states, such as Iran, celebrating the new Democratic congress. :yak5:
Now this disturbs me.... |
Gentleman, let's get back on topic here. How would you propose, if it were you in thedrivers seat, we settle the mess in Iraq. What in your opinion is the clearest track to the resolution of this conflict?:huh:
|
Quote:
The only solution to these problems will be serious bi-partisan pragmatic thinking...and dumping Rummy was a positive first step. -spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
-spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
-spence |
Quote:
-spence |
Unfrortunately, there is no easy way out. We can't hand the Iraqi people a hot steaming plate of camel dung, that we dished up, and say "bon appetit" and "au revoir".
That's what Powell meant when he told the rest of the Administration, "you break it, you own it" before the war. Maybe now everyone understands why Bush 41 never wanted to take Bahgdad or overthrow Saddam back in 1991 ;) W should have listened more closely to Daddy's advice and not Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld. |
Doenoe
Ok..... since a very large number of combatants, Iraqi and foreign to Iraq, do not want us there at all I don`t see how its possible.
Saddam was The Don of a criminal empire which controlled a largely volatile nation by extreme brute force and control.... FEAR. We are the enemy to many who live there. From Shock and Awe to all the ongoing policing and attempted inforcements and brutalities of war we are not the saviour country bringing peace and Democracy. We are the enemy. We leave and the competing factions will only further devastate Iraq and each other in a quest for power and control. Why are we there? I truly believe its about oil and establishing a base of operations for our military in an oil rich region. Said base would give us a foothold for future wars which seem impending. I do not have an idea that I think is viable for a solution to staightening out this catastrophic mess. It all appears to be a blackhole of sorts that destroys all who enter its field of influence. On that cheery note..... I hope the fishing is better next year :btu: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're comparing apples to oranges. Look at the Kurds, no problem with motivation...because they have ownership. -spence |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Bush has been against setting many meaningful goals that would help to pressure Iraqi's into taking action into their own hands. I'm not advocating an immediate pull-out, but we might have to let them crash the bike in order to learn how to ride. -spence |
Get....................... A....................... Room :bl:
|
How the hell did we get into a civil war in Iraq?
|
Training security forces in Irag is a joke!!!
Who makes up the security force? You have Sunni's and Shiites, both whom hate each other!!! Like I said before, Iraq should no longer be a country!!! It should be divided into 3 new countries of autonomy!!! Kurds in the North (Whom can stand on their own now!!!) Sunni's in the middle (With security support from Syria!!!) Shiite's in the South (With support from Iran!!!) Oil sharing revenues will be worked out by everyone involved!!! This way, The USA can withdraw its troops in a show of a settlement and not as a show of defeat!!! Besides, putting Syria and Iran on the world stage will force them to follow thru with whatever plans they have to help!!! |
Quote:
You only had to look at the Balkans to see what was going to happen after Saddam was out of the picture. Very similar picture--bunch of disparate ethnicities/religions artificially held together under the reign of a brutal dictator (Tito in Yugoslavia, Hussein in Iraq). When the cement holding it together is removed, all hell breaks loose. It's our great misfortune as a country to be too idealistic for our own good, still, after we should know better. We see people being brutalized in the world and we want to do something about it. That dirtbag Milosevic is ethnically cleansing Serbia by slaughtering Croats and Muslims, heck, let's stick our nose in that mess--and in the worst possible way, under the auspices of the UN :rollem: :doh: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com