[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Follow along here...

If the WHO said on January 20th that there was no evidence that it transmitted easily from human to human, then on what basis are you libs shrieking that Trump should have done much more.

You can't have it both ways.

If Trump instituted a lockdown on January, you all would have gone berserk that he was going against the WHO.

You say his Chinese travel restrictions went too far, but at the same time say he didn't do nearly enough. Yet you also say the WHO wasn't negligent in January when they said it wasn't easily transmitted from human to human. So according to you, the WHO had no reason to say it transmitted easily from human to human in late January, yet at the same time you say Trump didn't do enough in January. Which is it? He was supposed to know better than the WHO? About what was happening in Wuhan?

Additionally, Libs don't like Trump saying he has "total control" over forcing states to do what he wants, yet you only blame him and not the governors, who you say have that control. So you say Trump can't tell states what to do, but at the same time all this is Trumps fault, not the fault of the governors who you say are the only ones with authority to do anything. Again, which is it? You can't have both.

There is zero logic there. The only consistency, naturally, is that every syllable is an attack on Trump. You cannot do anything else.

Clearly you want it both ways blame china and the WHO. For what Trump failed to do.. its that obvious..

White House defends Ivanka Trump's personal travel amid lockdown

Shocking
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device