Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So a D Senator who actually has Indian blood and who you thinks is a liar gets you more upset than having almost all R Senators (and like 2/3 of all Rs ) lying about who won the last election. 
Seems like the Rs are the ones who are lying, bitter, angry and more and more unlikeable little shrews. |
she’s got as much indian blood as many, many people who don’t claim to be native american. she made that claim, in an application for a job at harvard paying $400,000 a year.
if you don’t sense anything the least but suspicious about that, of course that’s your right.
i’m very upset about republicans believing that stupid lie. i don’t like it at all, it undermines our credibility.
Fair enough? i’m much more concerned about republicans believing the big lie. at the same time it’s hysterical that this fraud of a senator ( its ok for her to get rich off college students, and it’s ok for her to get rich flipping foreclosures, but she says it’s immoral when everyone else does it - does that upset YOU?) calls someone a freeloader who has created 70,000 jobs in the US and is about to pay more than $10 billion in federal income tax.
He’s contributed infinitely more than Princess Spreading Bull ever will.
But he’s a freeloader.
Makes all kinds of sense.
Paul, what’s your opinion of a senator who makes tons of money off of college students and flipping foreclosed houses, who at the same time shrieks in front of cameras that it’s immoral for banks to do the same exact thing? why is it ok when she does it? why is she entitled to enrich herself in ways she’d deny to others?
Looking forward to your answer.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device