Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Until then, you're entitled to your narrative.
It’s really not rocket science
They wanted to overturn the legitimate election. Via lies unethical and questionable legal interpretations. They feed the Maga world red meat lie after lie from before during and after the election Trump refused to conduct a transfer of power in a timely fashion they called for the Maga universe to appear for the stop the steal rally then instigated them with more lying and whipped up the crowd
Then the Dogs many who heard their marching orders for months show up with helmets body armor zip ties bear spray batons to take back what Trump and Republicans had told them was taken from them!
Then the chain broke and the hounds were off already with the scent of keeping Trump in office
Only then did the handlers get concerned. They wanted a clean coup some twisted legal version
And just because it doesn’t succeed doesn’t make it some made up narrative
As for Trump, maybe more texts will explicitly show that he approved of the riot and wanted it to continue
A brave statement knowing 100% he’ll never testify under oath
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
You're right. Your theories are not rocket science. Rocket, or any science, requires more than (as in your theory) conjecture and supposition which lead to making an unproven narrative comprised of statements as if they must somehow be true because, to you, they appear to make some kind of immutable truth.
But you are entitled to your narrative. Don't be flummoxed that others are not persuaded by it. Some people, especially as in actual courts of justice, require more than made up narrative presented as fact.