Quote:
Originally Posted by stripermagnet
i think everyone should stop complaining about "spot specific" posts. honestly i doubt theres any spots left where only a handful of people could figure out that its a good idea to fish there. most people arent stupid. rocks + white water or sandbars or holes all = fish. its common sense if you have a honey hole where you stand on a specific rock or whatever thats different, but theres no secret beaches. and second, if anyone here can show up at a spot they've never fished in their lives and magically know the right tide, time of day, moon phase, weather, lure/bait, and presentation to use then congratulations youre the best fisherman in the world. and third, we all need to stop bad mouthing other peoples posts, its always the same crew and its annoying. if you dont like a post leave it alone
|
In the Utopian world I might actually agree with a third of what you said. Certain places can only survive so much pressure. Some places can survive a lot more pressure, and some are impervious to the amount of "spot burning" that goes on. But where is it safe to draw that line? Posting spot specific info online doesn't always ruin a spot or cause a thousand people to go but SOMETIMES it does. Me, I want to err on the side of caution.
Spots can & should be shared, I just feel it should be in smaller groups, between people, in a club, or something. I don't think it is wise to mark
specific stuff about locations in a historical and searchable database.
Stripermagnet, I realize that preventing detailed discussion on spots does not fit into your immediate wants but just keep in mind that it is the safe thing for the SPOT. When REPORTS and SPOTS mix, it can get ugly. Ask any of the Canal guys when their area gets juicy - and the Canal is probably the most "burned" spot in the Northeast.