View Single Post
Old 01-14-2010, 09:55 PM   #10
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
The other part of the argument is that the recs represent 99.99% of the anglers and generate 90% of the economic impact.
I understand that...to some extent. However, I am not convinced that I should be able to keep a bass every day I fish, but someone else who doesn't fish can't go to a nice restaurant and get a bass fillet during a limited season. It is all about total numbers to me. Economic impact wise, having a healthy fish population is what is needed to keep recs fishing. Even if I could never keep a bass, I would still fish. Not the case for the commercial guys.

Stuff needs to be fixed, but cutting the commercials out doesn't seem to be necessary to me, but I am open to all points on this. I would actually be much happier to have a limited commercial season and not allow recs to keep fish over 40".

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline   Reply With Quote