Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-23-2008, 11:18 PM   #1
BasicPatrick
M.S.B.A.
iTrader: (0)
 
BasicPatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: I live in the Villiage of Hyannis in the Town of Barnstable in the Commonwealth of MA
Posts: 2,795
Send a message via AIM to BasicPatrick Send a message via Yahoo to BasicPatrick
Exclamation Save Hatteras Beach Access--Time To Fight Back Is Now

PRIORITY ANNOUNCEMENT

PLEASE READ THIS INFORMATION AND ACT ON IT NOW


On June 11, North Carolina U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Dole and Richard Burr and U.S. Rep. Walter Jones introduced legislation
into the Senate and the House of Representatives that would set aside an amendment to current resource management
(consent decree) and require that the Park Service operate the seashore under its duly authorized resource management
plan (interim plan). Upon reading the letter provided below, it should be obvious that the importance of these bills extends
well beyond the current issue regarding Cape Hatteras. This is no longer simply the classic debate over protection of
resources versus human use and development. This is a debate regarding who is in charge of managing resources, the
government in compliance with congressional acts or environmental groups with one goal, maximizing resource protection
without regard to the costs of their proposals. The courts have been supporting the latter.

At this point, the bills have been referred to the appropriate committees. This is where most bills die. If we want these
bills to get to the floor, we need to give our representatives a reason to co-sponsor the bills. If you don’t do something
now, this type of action on the part of the courts and environmental groups will likely impact you in the very near future.

Take a stand. Print these instructions and take the 30 minutes needed to send the emails. Better yet, if you want to have
the biggest impact, fax the letters and follow up via phone. Please, at least write your Senators and House
Representative—steps 1 through 11.

Don’t forget PASS THIS ONTO EVERYONE IN YOUR ADDRESS BOOK.
THIS IS NOT JUST A CAPE HATTERAS ISSUE.

If after you are done you would like to follow the progress of the bills, bookmark the following links:

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/...s=110#activity

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/...s=110#activity

INSTRUCTIONS
Go to http://www.visi.com/juan/congress
Type your zip code, you will get a list with 2 senators and 1 house representative
Click on the first senator in the list.
Fill out the form (use National Parks, Natural Resources, or Judiciary for the topic) and Senate Bill 3133 for the subject.
Copy the letter presented below to the message area.
Edit the letter filling in your information and deleting HR 6233.
Hit the back button until you get back to the list of representatives.
Click on the second senator and repeat steps 4 through 7.
Click on the house representative (3rd person in the list).
Fill out the form (use National Parks, Natural Resources, or Judiciary for the topic) and HR 6233 for the subject.
Copy and edit the letter filling in your information and deleting Senate Bill 3133.
Go to http://www.rahall.house.gov/index.ph...521&Itemid=162 .

Repeat steps 10 & 11, except there is no topic field.
Add the following: Please forward my request to the entire committee.
Go to http://judiciary.house.gov/contact.aspx .
Repeat steps 10 & 11, except there is no topic or subject field—type your own subject line.
Go to http://energy.senate.gov/public/inde...n=Contact.Home .
Repeat steps 4 through 6, except there is no topic field.

LETTER
My name is (Your Name). I am a voting member of (Your state or district). I am writing to ask you to co-sponsor
HR 6233/Senate Bill 3133. As described below, my request is based upon the opinion that environmental groups, with the
assistance of the courts, are usurping governmental authority for resource management on federal lands. More often than
not the management techniques that result ignore the cost benefit analysis required by NEPA and other Congressional
Acts.

On April 30, the United States district court for the eastern district of North Carolina, northern division accepted a consent
decree that resulted in the voluntary dismissal of a lawsuit brought by Defenders of Wildlife and Audubon against
CHNSRA. The consent decree (signed under the threat that all public access would be denied) amended a duly authorized
resource management plan (Interim Plan). The amendment eliminated ALL discretion on the part of NPS and has severely
limited public access to park. As a result, the decree is not only having a severe economic impact on Dare County and NC,
but also, has the effect of delegating managerial functions of NPS to the court and private environmental groups. This is
an unconstitutional delegation of federal authority.

The impact of the decision to accept the consent degree is not limited to CHNSRA or NC. In fact, each time the courts
overturn management decisions made by governmental units, the courts embolden environmental groups. For example,
the following comment from the Center for Biological Diversity clearly shows the Center's total disregard for the government’
s role in management of federal lands and their confidence in being able 1) to dictate to NPS and USFWS, and 2) to ignore
Congressional Acts regarding appropriate rulemaking procedures.

"To remind the Service of the true definition of ‘essential habitat,’ in 2007 the Center filed a notice of intent to sue the
agency over that decision (Piping Plover Habitat) and 54 others that have driven imperiled species across the country
closer to extinction." (http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/s...ver/index.html)

Co-sponsoring the above-noted bill will send a clear message that management of federal lands is the sole
discretion of the federal agency in charge and must be done in accordance with Congressional Acts. Anything
less, is equivalent to abdicating governmental responsibility for federal land management, to ignoring
Congressional Acts, and to encouraging massive expenditures of government funds on legal fees.

Please take a stand and co-sponsor this bill.

"It is impossible to complain and to achieve at the same time"--Basic Patrick (on a good day)

BasicPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com