|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
02-10-2009, 04:12 PM
|
#2
|
........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
|
ain't stimulatin....
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 04:16 PM
|
#3
|
sick of bluefish
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
|
Lower Healthcare Costs: To save not only jobs, but money and lives, we will update and computerize our
healthcare system to cut red tape, prevent medical mistakes, and help reduce healthcare costs by billions of
dollars each year.
! $20 billion for health information technology to prevent medical mistakes, provide better care to patients
and introduce cost-saving efficiencies.
! $4.1 billion to provide for preventative care and to evaluate the most effective healthcare treatments.
|
making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 04:23 PM
|
#4
|
Old Guy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 8,760
|
New Fed mobiles how does that stimulate
New Homeland Security Building likewise
I don't see stimulus being the complete answer
Lower the capital gains tax, Keep tax credits in place add more for alternative energy, healthcare, energy efficiency
|
|
|
|
02-17-2009, 11:44 AM
|
#5
|
Retired Surfer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sunset Grill
Posts: 9,511
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIJIMMY
Lower Healthcare Costs: To save not only jobs, but money and lives, we will update and computerize our
healthcare system to cut red tape, prevent medical mistakes, and help reduce healthcare costs by billions of
dollars each year.
! $20 billion for health information technology to prevent medical mistakes, provide better care to patients
and introduce cost-saving efficiencies.
! $4.1 billion to provide for preventative care and to evaluate the most effective healthcare treatments.
|
I wonder why the ACLU hasn't jumped on this big brother intrusion into our lives. Imagine the government going totally off to the left, completely socialist, even pink maybe. The government will have a list of everyone who isn't healthy. Remember the long march in the movie Soylent Green. Only those affluent people who can afford private health care wouldn't have thier lives intruded upon. Put on too much weight and the health care Nazi comes out from behind the counter yelling, "no health care for you, no see doctor, go away".
|
Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MA
Serial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
|
|
|
02-18-2009, 08:35 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swimmer
I wonder why the ACLU hasn't jumped on this big brother intrusion into our lives. Imagine the government going totally off to the left, completely socialist, even pink maybe. The government will have a list of everyone who isn't healthy. Remember the long march in the movie Soylent Green. Only those affluent people who can afford private health care wouldn't have thier lives intruded upon. Put on too much weight and the health care Nazi comes out from behind the counter yelling, "no health care for you, no see doctor, go away".
|
Nah, never happen  , we have been promised the Same health care program that Congress has.
Think that promise might be lost in the shuffle along with the more than the few others already broken 
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 04:22 PM
|
#7
|
sick of bluefish
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
|
“Making Work Pay” tax credit. The bill would cut taxes for more than 95% of working
families in the United States. For 2009 and 2010, the bill would provide a refundable tax credit
of up to $500 for working individuals and $1,000 for working families. This tax credit would be
calculated at a rate of 6.2% of earned income, and would phase out for taxpayers with adjusted
gross income in excess of $75,000 ($150,000 for married couples filing jointly). Taxpayers can
receive this benefit through a reduction in the amount of income tax that is withheld from their
paychecks, or through claiming the credit on their tax returns. This proposal is estimated to cost
$145.309 billion over 10 years.
145 billion over 10 years - WTF is 500 bucks going to do?
|
making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 05:28 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Here's my quick take (no surprise to many here) it won't fix anything. This bill is nothing more then 10 years worth of Democrat programs wrapped up in a con job bill forced down the American throats by the "Messia". The Govornment caused the problem we are in and now they will make it worse. Tell me one program that they run that accomplished what it was supposed to do.
|
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 06:50 PM
|
#9
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
No sense reading it, it's only a trillion with interest and with Geitner talking about needing another 2 trillion today it's peanuts.
Glad the market has such confidence in the "spending" bill and Geitner, the only man for the job, with a 400 point drop.
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
02-10-2009, 06:47 PM
|
#10
|
sick of bluefish
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
|
market tanked today on news of TARP 2.
|
making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 12:43 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Where are the Obama defenders to point out the way this bill will help fix America's economy? Help me understand
|
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 04:37 PM
|
#12
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
As long as they keep the $30 million in the bill for studying the Satlwater Mouse in Pelosie's state, the economy will be right back on track.
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 05:04 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hyde Park, MA
Posts: 4,152
|
It's so easy for these "talking head" politicians to whoop and holler about the stimulus package, because they are going to benefit from it in way too many ways. With all the hidden/subtle pork programs and mumbo-jumbo doubletalk explanations, their going to end up pocketing a big chunk of this money for themselves.
Instead of doing what would be the normal, common sense things to help the economy, they want to play roulette with the entire country's future. AND THEY BET IT ALL ON "00"!
|
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 06:43 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cranberry Coast Gateway 2 Cape Cod
Posts: 4,143
|
WE R F'D
thanks 4 the $ 13 extra bucks in my pay check WOW ---
KEEP IT U need it more than I do
Link SR 
|
" Happy as a clam at high tide "
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 03:26 PM
|
#15
|
lobster = striper bait
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Popes Island Performing Arts Center
Posts: 5,871
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by missing link
WE R F'D
thanks 4 the $ 13 extra bucks in my pay check WOW ---
KEEP IT U need it more than I do
Link SR 
|
Since you don't want it, you can send it to my paypal acct.
Thanks!
|
Ski Quicks Hole
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 08:55 PM
|
#16
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FishermanTim
With all the hidden/subtle pork programs and mumbo-jumbo doubletalk explanations, their going to end up pocketing a big chunk of this money for themselves.
|
Always a hidden agenda in selling their votes, according to the NY Times, Arlen Specter R got 6.5 BILLION for his pet project ,medical research, from the "spending" bill.
Oink Oink.
Prolly help a research hospital like Jefferson, but as with most of these research facilities everything is in place and wouldn't create many new jobs.
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:23 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
Where are the Obama defenders to point out the way this bill will help fix America's economy? Help me understand
|
WELL? Anyone, anyone at all.............
|
|
|
|
02-15-2009, 11:36 AM
|
#18
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
WELL? Anyone, anyone at all.............
|
The silence is deafening.
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
02-14-2009, 01:50 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
|
|
|
|
02-14-2009, 08:02 PM
|
#20
|
Hardcore Equipment Tester
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Abington, MA
Posts: 6,234
|
Quote:
Save and create 3.5 million jobs.
|
The guy from Cat said the bill was great, but he was still laying off no matter what...
|
Bent Rods and Screaming Reels!
Spot NAZI
|
|
|
02-15-2009, 11:50 AM
|
#21
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
OK,
I don't have a lot of time right now to go through and debate point by point. I grabbed some of the lines from the article you posted Buckman, and bolded a few that directly relate to jobs. I agree that there is some crap in here, but there is a lot of good as well.
A main goal of education spending in the stimulus bill is to help keep teachers on the job. Nearly 600,000 jobs in elementary and secondary schools could be eliminated by state budget cuts over the next three years, according to a study released this past week by the University of Washington. Fewer teachers means higher class sizes, something that districts are scrambling to prevent.
Highways repaved for the first time in decades. Century-old waterlines dug up and replaced with new pipes. Aging bridges, stressed under the weight of today's SUVs, reinforced with fresh steel and concrete.
But the $90 billion is a mere down payment on what's needed to repair and improve the country's physical backbone. And not all economists agree it's an effective way to add jobs in the long term, or stimulate the economy. OK, I agree that long-term it may not be a solution, but someone will have to do this work, right?
The package includes $20 billion aimed at "green" jobs to make wind turbines, solar panels and improve energy efficiency in schools and federal buildings. It includes $6 billion in loan guarantees for renewable energy projects as well as tax breaks or direct grants covering 30 percent of wind and solar energy investments. Another $5 billion is marked to help low-income homeowners make energy improvements. I am a huge proponent of this. Who wouldn't be. Even if you don't believe in the negative impacts of carbon emissions, by creating our own energy we are decreasing the amount of foreign oil we need, which improves national security and has other environmental benefits, namely, less oil, coal and nat'l gas being removed from the ground and transported
The package includes $9.2 billion for environmental projects at the Interior Department and the Environmental Protection Agency. The money would be used to shutter abandoned mines on public lands, to help local governments protect drinking water supplies, and to erect energy-efficient visitor centers at wildlife refuges and national parks.
The Interior Department estimates that its portion of the work would generate about 100,000 jobs over the next two years.
The compromise bill doles out more than $3.7 billion for police programs, much of which is set aside for hiring new officers.
An additional $1 billion is set aside to hire local police under the Community Oriented Policing Services program. The program, known as COPS grants, paid the salaries of many local police officers and was a "modest contributor" to the decline in crime in the 1990s, according to a 2005 government oversight report. Both programs had all been eliminated during the Bush administration.
I took a few minutes to do this, to ask YOU guys a question.
IF this stimulus plan is not the answer, what is? How do you think we should go about turning around the economy and creating jobs, locally and federally?
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
02-15-2009, 12:11 PM
|
#22
|
Old Guy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 8,760
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
OK
I took a few minutes to do this, to ask YOU guys a question.
IF this stimulus plan is not the answer, what is? How do you think we should go about turning around the economy and creating jobs, locally and federally?
|
I agree with the HOUND, instead of WHINING about the bill.
Tell, do tell what you outspoken leaders of this board, recommend this country do to get us back on the track?
NO pissin, just the facts.
|
|
|
|
02-15-2009, 08:44 PM
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by striperman36
I agree with the HOUND, instead of WHINING about the bill.
Tell, do tell what you outspoken leaders of this board, recommend this country do to get us back on the track?
NO pissin, just the facts.
|
Look, there's no doubt that you can spend 800 billion dollars and create a bunch of jobs. That's not going to fix the mess we are in.
You can double spending on a bunch of programs and help some people out. That won't fix the country.
Rolling back the clock on welfare reform that Reagan and Clinton worked hard on won't help the country either.
Like it or not tax breaks work...Handing out money will not. It's not even real money they are handing out. It's debt that your kids will have to pay.
You have to give people insentive to work hard. An ability to grow there companies.
|
|
|
|
02-15-2009, 10:13 PM
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,467
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
Like it or not tax breaks work...
|
Yes, the GOP magic "cure all" prescribed for any and all situations. Recession? Cut taxes...Growth? Cut taxes...Terrorism? Cut taxes...The clap? Cut taxes...
If tax breaks are always so good why don't we just eliminate taxes?
Also, doesn't the bill as is contain hundreds of billions in tax breaks? Shouldn't these work to stimulate the economy while the other spending keeps the ship right side up?
Again, I think there is wasteful spending in the bill, but a lot of line items, for instance spending to help communities not have to fire teachers and police, is probably needed, but the GOP is branding this as Liberal Pork.
-spence
|
|
|
|
02-16-2009, 07:12 AM
|
#25
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Again, I think there is wasteful spending in the bill, but a lot of line items, for instance spending to help communities not have to fire teachers and police, is probably needed, but the GOP is branding this as Liberal Pork. -spence
|
Which is happening already in RI... maybe some of that can be blamed on the unions, but certainly not all of it!
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
02-16-2009, 08:01 AM
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Yes, the GOP magic "cure all" prescribed for any and all situations. Recession? Cut taxes...Growth? Cut taxes...Terrorism? Cut taxes...The clap? Cut taxes...
If tax breaks are always so good why don't we just eliminate taxes?
Also, doesn't the bill as is contain hundreds of billions in tax breaks? Shouldn't these work to stimulate the economy while the other spending keeps the ship right side up?
Again, I think there is wasteful spending in the bill, but a lot of line items, for instance spending to help communities not have to fire teachers and police, is probably needed, but the GOP is branding this as Liberal Pork.
-spence
|
What tax breaks mean is that the govornment takes less of OUR money. That means we can spend it how we want. Hire more people, remodel a room, buy a car. It's our money and if you can argue they need more of it and you feel better about them spending it, then nobody is stopping you from writing a check.
Claiming the loss fire fighters, policemen and teachers is the oldest liberal con in the book. I don't buy it. I'm from Ma. You can't drive through town without seeing fifteen cops working details. Get rid of all the mandated special education for every little problem and you will have plenty of teachers. Reform emergency personel sick pay policy and you will have plenty of firefighters. If you don't want to reform any thing here, then there are plenty of places you can cut. We don't need to increase funding over current levels.
IMO over 1/2 of this bill is money that we don't need to spend right now. We simple don't have it. It's not any more complicated then that. If you fund something now that you can't afford you have to get rid of it later. It's economics 101. WE DON"T HAVE THE $$$$.
Last edited by buckman; 02-16-2009 at 08:26 AM..
|
|
|
|
02-16-2009, 09:56 AM
|
#27
|
Old Guy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 8,760
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
Look, there's no doubt that you can spend 800 billion dollars and create a bunch of jobs. That's not going to fix the mess we are in.
You can double spending on a bunch of programs and help some people out. That won't fix the country.
Rolling back the clock on welfare reform that Reagan and Clinton worked hard on won't help the country either.
Like it or not tax breaks work...Handing out money will not. It's not even real money they are handing out. It's debt that your kids will have to pay.
You have to give people insentive to work hard. An ability to grow there companies.
|
Thats a pretty lame response based on all the other crap you been posting here. maybe you should actually read the bill inside of just complaining about it.
|
|
|
|
02-16-2009, 10:45 AM
|
#28
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by striperman36
Thats a pretty lame response based on all the other crap you been posting here. maybe you should actually read the bill inside of just complaining about it.
|
I read the bill. Did you? My opinion is based on my believe. You can call it crap if you want. That's your opinion. Granted, it doesn't have as much substance as your response, but again,that's my opinion.
My feeling about the bill and the process is:
It is too based on the believe that the govornment can increase it's size and spend our way out of the current situation.
We just don't have the money!
It is full of earmarks...
The people that will be dolling out the money are selfserving, currupt, hypocrits that stuffed this bill full of everything they tried to pass in the past. This is a point that you fail to except or you are ok with.
The bill was written based on emotion and not economics.
Bottom line.... The process was just plain wrong and this bill is a joke. Thats just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
02-15-2009, 01:21 PM
|
#29
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
02-15-2009, 01:32 PM
|
#30
|
Old Guy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 8,760
|
I think we are going to have to wait for sometime for someone to speak up 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 PM.
|
| |