|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
03-26-2016, 04:22 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,374
|
Arizona officials decry long voting queues
In 2012, the county - which includes Phoenix, the state's largest city - had 200 polling places.
Found this on the BBC : http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-35900011
Phoenix is a predominately Democratic area. In Maricopa County, about 1.2 million people are eligible to vote, but there were only 60 polling places.
Arizona's Republican-led legislature decided to lower the number of polling places to save money, officials said.
Unintentional consequences or part of the plan
No voter in 2016 should stand in line for 1 -2-3-4 or 5 hrs in any election in any state reguardless of income, party of choice, or neighborhood..
make election day a national holiday 
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 06:44 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
Agreed. What a discrace.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 08:13 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
|
Yea cause the hacks, government "workers" and teachers need another holiday .
A liberal wouldn't think of this but it would be cheaper to open more polling places as this appears to be budget specific .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 08:15 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
Why can't we all vote online and use our social security number as a voter ID ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 08:30 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Why can't we all vote online and use our social security number as a voter ID ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Racist 😊
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 09:22 AM
|
#6
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,203
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Why can't we all vote online and use our social security number as a voter ID ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 12:37 PM
|
#7
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Why can't we all vote online and use our social security number as a voter ID ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I'd be all for that, with some on the ground options for folks that want it. Scenes like this are horrible. I understand having a wait, typically if I don't get there right when doors open, I figure 30min or so isn't bad. Stories of multiple hours gets ridiculous, whatever party you vote for....
And, I know, I know, all liberals scream and moan about ID's so I should be ranting. I think it is overblown on both sides, it does limit more democrats, but I think it is about the same number as the fraud votes (so close to nil)
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 12:40 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
|
I don't see online voting anytime soon. Aside from the technical considerations the fact that taking the time to get out and vote means something shouldn't be discounted.
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 12:41 PM
|
#9
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I don't see online voting anytime soon. Aside from the technical considerations the fact that taking the time to get out and vote means something shouldn't be discounted.
|
True, I do like my I voted sticker!
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 12:49 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
WDMSO - I'll ask again...how does it benefit the GOP, to suppress Democrat turnout, during the primaries? Please explain. I see how it helps in the general, no idea how it helps them in the primaries...
I agree it looks like some people got screwed out of being able to vote (that needs to be dealt with harshly). But I don't see any political motive. I don't see how it helps the GOP in the general election.
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 12:51 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I don't see online voting anytime soon. Aside from the technical considerations the fact that taking the time to get out and vote means something shouldn't be discounted.
|
You nailed it!! Perfect answer.
It's too important. On-line could never, ever be secure enough. We don't even let Congressmen vote for bills over the phone or online, it has to be in person.
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 02:32 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,374
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
WDMSO - I'll ask again...how does it benefit the GOP, to suppress Democrat turnout, during the primaries? Please explain. I see how it helps in the general, no idea how it helps them in the primaries...
I agree it looks like some people got screwed out of being able to vote (that needs to be dealt with harshly). But I don't see any political motive. I don't see how it helps the GOP in the general election.
|
200 polling stations to 60 in a dem district not sure how you cant see it ... if they did the same in all districts for all parties or revert back to 200 polling places on election day I would concede your point .. but that seems not to be the case
primary's are practice for game day
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 02:34 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
True, I do like my I voted sticker!
|
right....most people vote every cycle without a problem....seem like it's the democrats that always have trouble figuring it out 
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 02:56 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
right....most people vote every cycle without a problem....seem like it's the democrats that always have trouble figuring it out 
|
Jibberish.
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 03:55 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
right....most people vote every cycle without a problem....seem like it's the democrats that always have trouble figuring it out 
|
Well. If you want to go there, then I will help you figure out why that is. When local governments started cutting polling stations, they removed them from poorer areas where the voting base is more prone to vote democrat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 04:03 PM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
200 polling stations to 60 in a dem district not sure how you cant see it ... if they did the same in all districts for all parties or revert back to 200 polling places on election day I would concede your point .. but that seems not to be the case
primary's are practice for game day
|
"not sure how you cant see it "
Because in the primaries, Republicans run against Republicans, and democrats run against democrats. If fewer democrats show up to vote (while I agree it's unethical), it doesn't help the GOP. It means fewer people will choose between Clinton and Sanders. It does nothing to help the GOP that I can see. Zip.
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 04:03 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
When local governments started cutting polling stations, they removed them from poorer areas where the voting base is more prone to vote democrat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
then wouldn't the local governments be more likely democrat?
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 04:05 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
I guess there are no poor, elderly or minority republican voters.... or if there are.... these things don't affect their ability to cast a vote for some reason 
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 04:08 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
|
Not as many.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-26-2016, 04:55 PM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
[QUOTE=scottw;1097356]I guess there are no poor, elderly or minority republican voters.... or if there are.... these things don't affect their ability to cast a vote for some reason  [/QUOTE
Actually there are no poor white people, dem or republican
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.
|
| |