|
I wish they would take the whole bill, throw it in the fire and start over with a different approach.
If they want to decrease the cost of health care, I think they are approaching it from the wrong side of the equation. Assess the high cost patients the government pays for, exclude the drug addicts, alcoholics, morbidly obese and other 'self-inflicted sick' from care and watch the costs plummet.
"You're an out of work heroin addict who is suffering from hepatitis and HIV due to using dirty needles? NEXT!!"
"You've lived the last 5 years on a 'diet' of fast food and desserts and now can't leave bed and need your foot amputated due to diabetes? NEXT!!"
This country needs to stop helping those who refuse to help themselves.
After we cull those people out, assess why the costs are so incredibly high. Fix the treatment side of the equation. Doctors are forced to order unnecessary tests in order to cover their rears. Visits to specialists would be less if their malpractice insurance cost less. Limit the amount doctors can be sued for and costs should decrease.
Multiple small bites will yield significantly better results than one substantial overhaul. Then, the smaller aspects that don't work can be culled out or adjusted.
The current approach to reform makes me sick. (Lame pun intended)
|
Threaded Mode