Supreme Court and Gun Regulation

[scottw]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

The right to bear arms is clear and articulate.apparently it is not for 4 current Supreme Court Justices and Mayor Daley The Constitutionality of abortion is not. actually it is, unless you engage in a radical interpretation of life "based on personal whim, political orientation, views of 'social justice'" I should have stated that it's application requires interpretation... never said anything about interpretations should be"based on personal whim, political orientation, views of 'social justice'".

Judicial interpretation is a theory or mode of thought that explains("progressives") how the judiciary should interpret the law, particularly constitutional documents and legislation (see statutory interpretation). An interpretation which results in or supports some form of law-making role for the judiciary in interpreting the law is sometimes pejoratively characterized as judicial activism, the opposite of which is judicial lethargy, with judicial restraint somewhere in between.

I added "progressives" JD...you are simply repeating progressive doctorine with regard to the "interpretation' of the Constitution...which allows "Change" you can believe in?