Supreme Court and Gun Regulation

[scottw]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

The right to bear arms is clear and articulate.apparently it is not for 4 current Supreme Court Justices and Mayor Daley The Constitutionality of abortion is not. actually it is, unless you engage in a radical interpretation of life "based on personal whim, political orientation, views of 'social justice'" I should have stated that it's application requires interpretation... never said anything about interpretations should be"based on personal whim, political orientation, views of 'social justice'".

Judicial interpretation is a theory or mode of thought that explains("progressives") how the judiciary should interpret the law, particularly constitutional documents and legislation (see statutory interpretation). An interpretation which results in or supports some form of law-making role for the judiciary in interpreting the law is sometimes pejoratively characterized as judicial activism, the opposite of which is judicial lethargy, with judicial restraint somewhere in between.

I added "progressives" JD...you are simply repeating progressive doctorine with regard to the "interpretation' of the Constitution...which allows "Change" you can believe in?

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by scottw

[I added "progressives" JD...you are simply repeating progressive doctorine with regard to the "interpretation' of the Constitution...which allows "Change" you can believe in?

I'm proud that you were able to to make a post without mentioning Obama. Unfortunately, you're still unable to refrain from conflating topics.

Since you already present nonsense "facts" in the same way, here's something you may be interested in... Glenn Beck - Current Events & Politics - Announcing Beck University I don't think the chalk board with pictures of Stalin, Hitler and Swastikas is included though.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

conflating topics.

you shouldn't use words that you don't understand

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by scottw

you shouldn't use words that you don't understand

Conflate: verb - To bring things together and fuse them into a single entity

"Conflation occurs when the identities of two or more individuals, concepts, or places, sharing some characteristics of one another, become confused until there seems to be only a single identity — the differences appear to become lost"

Considering how you take any topic you may disagree with and somehow blend it in with progressives, socialism or Obama regardless of the topic's origin... seems pretty accurate.

[Slipknot]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

Considering how you take any topic you may disagree with and somehow blend it in with progressives, socialism or Obama regardless of the topic's origin... seems pretty accurate.

is that what Spence does?
I thought it was spin, but sounds like that to me

[scottw]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

Conflate: verb - To bring things together and fuse them into a single entity

"Conflation occurs when the identities of two or more individuals, concepts, or places, sharing some characteristics of one another, become confused until there seems to be only a single identity — the differences appear to become lost"

Considering how you take any topic you may disagree with and somehow blend it in with progressives, socialism or Obama regardless of the topic's origin... seems pretty accurate.

confusion would be the key word....
what you "interpret" as conflation on my part is a result of your inability to recognize and/or understand simple concepts and facts that disagree with your shifting world view..much easier for you to "merge" or conflate them into a perceived single mode of dissenting argument and then dismiss all with some Glen Beck or Fox news reference as you have done here and elsewhere...while completely ignoring the actual point or points...works for you I guess.... I've been and try to be pretty clear on progressives, socialism(ists) and Obama and the war that they are engaged in against America, the Constitution and our private sector....no conflation is necessary and to ignore the ideaology being forced on Americans currently, it's sources and the detremental effects is to have your head in the sand.. it becomes clearer each day .....at least for most Americans...I just can't figure out which side you are on sometimes.....you are idealogically erratic and that may be the cause of your "confusion by your own conflation"....... don't blame me....

I will give you a little credit however, once in a while you provide a real gem...like...the right to bear arms is constitutionally correct...or however you stated it...now that is brilliant stuff......

of course, we do need to worry about Spence's citizens bearing nuclear missiles