Thoughts?

[Swimmer]

Originally Posted by FishermanTim

She must be missing the spotlight and needed to get some air time.

How much state money will she be willing to throw into this lawsuit?
How much of that money could be used to give some assistance to the fishermen who will undoubtedly be screwed in the end when nothing changes except the money from one hand to another?



It sure looks good up front, but when all is said and done it will be a waste of time and money and the fishermen will lose again!

At least they are doeing something, and we have seen lately she isn't doing well in the criminal triale end of things
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[nightfighter]

It is directed at John Bullard, the Northeast Regional head of NOAA, who also was formerly mayor of New Bedford. Some feel he has used a heavier hand with the Gloucester fleet and has more interest in the New Bedford fishery. Folks in Gloucester got Coakley's attention, and this is an attempt to level the playing field and maybe, get some real science involved in decisions.

[bart]

Thanks for the insight, Nightfighter.

[nightfighter]

more regurgitation than insight....

[Abodeon]

Foolish Martha. If we don't let the stocks rebuild, and fast, we'll all be eating dogfish.

[mackenzie]

Originally Posted by Abodeon

Foolish Martha. If we don't let the stocks rebuild, and fast, we'll all be eating dogfish.

The other night on Chronicle one of the segments they mentioned dogfish as an alternative seafood choice. It was being served at one eatery and was sampled by Anthony. They even were having viewers text in alternative names that it could be called to make it more appealing to the public (ie hide its true I.D.). I am not a big fish eater but have to say that years ago I was served a grilled mystery fish at a cookout. Later told it was dogfish.. Best fish I have had.