email from Senator Blumenthal to Hilary

[JohnR]

I am more concerned with Hillary's Directorate of Information (Blumenthal's) illegal access to highly classified information that is illegally transmitted over non-secure systems to Hillary.

Spence will say there is nothing to see here but if anyone else did 1/1000 of this they would be behind bars.

[spence]

Originally Posted by JohnR

I am more concerned with Hillary's Directorate of Information (Blumenthal's) illegal access to highly classified information that is illegally transmitted over non-secure systems to Hillary.

What "highly classified information" did Blumenthal have access to? First I've ever heard of this...

Spence will say there is nothing to see here but if anyone else did 1/1000 of this they would be behind bars.

Saying this over and over doesn't make it true. How often does anyone get prosecuted for unknowingly handling classified information, not to mention information that's retroactively classified years later?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

. How often does anyone get prosecuted for unknowingly handling classified information, not to mention information that's retroactively classified years later?

wait....so the smartest woman in the world didn't recognize that any of the content of these emails might be sensitive at the time or possibly at a later date??

[buckman]

Originally Posted by scottw

wait....so the smartest woman in the world didn't recognize that any of the content of these emails might be sensitive at the time or possibly at a later date??

Not to mention that the people that evidently "classifie " these emails didn't have access to them until recently .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by spence

What "highly classified information" did Blumenthal have access to? First I've ever heard of this...


Saying this over and over doesn't make it true. How often does anyone get prosecuted for unknowingly handling classified information, not to mention information that's retroactively classified years later?

http://observer.com/2016/02/breaking...lives-at-risk/


You keep forgetting - those thousands of emails (not including ones deleted and not recoverable) are "born classified". These are the constraints everyone else in security needs to live within.

[spence]

Originally Posted by JohnR

http://observer.com/2016/02/breaking...lives-at-risk/

I see you're putting faith in pretty unbiased sources

It looks like this hit piece is referencing the CIA source named in an email from Blumenthal to Clinton, falsely redacted by Gowdy and later deemed not classified by the CIA. This was cleared up last fall.

You keep forgetting - those thousands of emails (not including ones deleted and not recoverable) are "born classified". These are the constraints everyone else in security needs to live within.

I see, the infighting between the CIA and State over retroactive classification is unnecessary then. Don't know why they're wasting their time.

[Nebe]

Originally Posted by spence

I see you're putting faith in pretty unbiased sources

It looks like this hit piece is referencing the CIA source named in an email from Blumenthal to Clinton, falsely redacted by Gowdy and later deemed not classified by the CIA. This was cleared up last fall.


I see, the infighting between the CIA and State over retroactive classification is unnecessary then. Don't know why they're wasting their time.

You sure it wasn't travel gate ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device