|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
03-01-2016, 08:26 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
|
Wow, he's descriptive. I've got to wonder what some of Karl Rove's emails on strategy have looked like...well, I'll keep wondering because he deleted them all. Oops...
|
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 08:30 AM
|
#2
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,272
|
I am more concerned with Hillary's Directorate of Information (Blumenthal's) illegal access to highly classified information that is illegally transmitted over non-secure systems to Hillary.
Spence will say there is nothing to see here but if anyone else did 1/1000 of this they would be behind bars.
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 08:55 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
I am more concerned with Hillary's Directorate of Information (Blumenthal's) illegal access to highly classified information that is illegally transmitted over non-secure systems to Hillary.
|
What "highly classified information" did Blumenthal have access to? First I've ever heard of this...
Quote:
Spence will say there is nothing to see here but if anyone else did 1/1000 of this they would be behind bars.
|
Saying this over and over doesn't make it true. How often does anyone get prosecuted for unknowingly handling classified information, not to mention information that's retroactively classified years later?
|
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 09:02 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
. How often does anyone get prosecuted for unknowingly handling classified information, not to mention information that's retroactively classified years later?
|
wait....so the smartest woman in the world didn't recognize that any of the content of these emails might be sensitive at the time or possibly at a later date??
|
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 09:05 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
wait....so the smartest woman in the world didn't recognize that any of the content of these emails might be sensitive at the time or possibly at a later date??
|
Not to mention that the people that evidently "classifie " these emails didn't have access to them until recently .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 09:10 AM
|
#6
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
What "highly classified information" did Blumenthal have access to? First I've ever heard of this...
Saying this over and over doesn't make it true. How often does anyone get prosecuted for unknowingly handling classified information, not to mention information that's retroactively classified years later?
|
http://observer.com/2016/02/breaking...lives-at-risk/
You keep forgetting - those thousands of emails (not including ones deleted and not recoverable) are "born classified". These are the constraints everyone else in security needs to live within.
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 09:31 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
|
I see you're putting faith in pretty unbiased sources
It looks like this hit piece is referencing the CIA source named in an email from Blumenthal to Clinton, falsely redacted by Gowdy and later deemed not classified by the CIA. This was cleared up last fall.
Quote:
You keep forgetting - those thousands of emails (not including ones deleted and not recoverable) are "born classified". These are the constraints everyone else in security needs to live within.
|
I see, the infighting between the CIA and State over retroactive classification is unnecessary then. Don't know why they're wasting their time.
|
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 09:37 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I see you're putting faith in pretty unbiased sources
It looks like this hit piece is referencing the CIA source named in an email from Blumenthal to Clinton, falsely redacted by Gowdy and later deemed not classified by the CIA. This was cleared up last fall.
I see, the infighting between the CIA and State over retroactive classification is unnecessary then. Don't know why they're wasting their time.
|
You sure it wasn't travel gate ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 08:35 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Wow, he's descriptive. I've got to wonder what some of Karl Rove's emails on strategy have looked like...well, I'll keep wondering because he deleted them all. Oops...
|
You are so predictable 😂
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-01-2016, 08:37 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Wow, he's descriptive. I've got to wonder what some of Karl Rove's emails on strategy have looked like...well, I'll keep wondering because he deleted them all. Oops...
|
Have you ever, even once, been critical of anything a prominent liberal has done? Just curious...
"They will in effect become liegemen bowing before him, but not in any way they will resent or will protest."
"admit to the President’s status above them "
That's my Senator. Hooray!
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.
|
| |