Charlottesville

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

The same folks who condemn The Cheato for not using strong enough language regarding the latest struggle were silent when Obama refused to single out radical Islamic terrorism. Funny how convenient it becomes when it suits the agenda ..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Trump loves saying “radical Islamic terrorism.” He has a tough time with “white supremacy.”


So should Trump call them Radical Christian White supremacy terrorism how would that go over with his base ???

read up O has explained many time why he wouldn't use “radical Islamic terrorism.” seem's you conveniently forgot who those people were who were most upset about Him not saying that... and how it fit their agenda.. FYI : the Right

[scottw]

not that they aren't deplorable, but you don't really hear much from these skin head/supremist/nazi whatevers very often.....you do, on the other hand...frequently hear from and witness the carnage from the other groups mentioned here on a regular basis, particularly over the last dozen years....and they easily lead the league in death, mayhem and destruction during that time...

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

So should Trump call them Radical Christian White supremacy terrorism how would that go over with his base ???

were they protesting in the name of Christ?...musta missed that

[boot man]

Originally Posted by scottw

were they protesting in the name of Christ?...musta missed that

Well by process of elimination, it wasn't in the name of Judaism, Islam, Santeria, .....

White, European heritage is usually Christian. But nobody said they were doing in the name of all Christians, just the twisted view of these Nazis and White Supremacists. Oh and those 2 fine people that were only there to protest the potential removal of a statue.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by boot man

Well by process of elimination, it wasn't in the name of Judaism, Islam, Santeria, .....

White, European heritage is usually Christian. But nobody said they were doing in the name of all Christians, just the twisted view of these Nazis and White Supremacists. Oh and those 2 fine people that were only there to protest the potential removal of a statue.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

we know that Jesus was both a man of color and a Jew/the original Christian...and probably opposed slavery....so not sure how Nazis and White Supremacists can be labeled or lumped in with or as being "Christians"?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

were they protesting in the name of Christ?...musta missed that

Sure, because Jesus was obviously a white supremacist. Don't you know anything?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Sure, because Jesus was obviously a white supremacist. Don't you know anything?

he did have those 12 slaves that he liked to order around

[buckman]

[QUOTE=wdmso;1126413


So should Trump call them Radical Christian White supremacy terrorism how would that go over with his base ???

[/QUOTE]

Describe Trumps base for me please . I need a good laugh
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

August 16, 2017

"A bronze statue of George Washington on horseback stands at the corner of 51st and King Drive, at the northwest entrance to Washington Park. Bishop James Dukes, pastor of Liberation Christian Center, said he wants the statue gone, and he wants George Washington’s name removed from the park. The pastor also said President Andrew Jackson’s name should be removed from nearby Jackson Park, because he also was a slave owner. He said he’s not necessarily asking the city rename the parks altogether. He suggested Washington Park could be named after former Mayor Harold Washington, and Jackson Park could be named after civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson or singer Michael Jackson."


yes...let's name playgrounds after Michael Jackson

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Trump loves saying “radical Islamic terrorism.” He has a tough time with “white supremacy.”


So should Trump call them Radical Christian White supremacy terrorism how would that go over
read up O has explained many time why he wouldn't use “radical Islamic terrorism.” seem's you conveniently forgot who those people were who were most upset about Him not saying that... and how it fit their agenda.. FYI : the Right

Nothing personal,but you honestly have a difficult time with the comprehension skills. Communication becomes futile with folks with limited skills. Go back to your Obama altar and enjoy your alternative universe.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device