The Stable Genius shows off

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

(1) how many times have you insulted me, Paul? But somehow it’s always ok when you do it. Show me one post where I insulted you w/o you whining about Liberals?

(2) I insult people in response to them insulting others. if you can point to where i’ve directly gone after someone’s children or parents, i apologize. But i’d bet everything i have that i’ve never done it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

But, I will state you never insulted someone's children/spouse (like SD) but you constantly insult liberals for no reason other to throw an insult out.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

But, I will state you never insulted someone's children/spouse (like SD) but you constantly insult liberals for no reason other to throw an insult out.

you’ve called me angry god knows how many times. it’s what intellectual wimps do when (1) they can’t respond to the case you’ve made, and (2) can’t admit you might have a point.

Paul, i also like jousting with you most of the time, but your differing rules depending on party are becoming much more glaring. Be a bit less like Pete and a bit more like ririckhound.

I dont believe i insult specific people here for no reason. i do it when i have a terrific reason.

You desperately try to make me out to be a blind conservative partisan. it’s not close to true. but you play that card anyway. there have been plenty of posts here where i’ve sided with liberals, i have been in the exact opposite side of issues with Scott and detbuch and SD. but i can disagree with them respectfully. you guys make it very tough.

when pete says it was ok for obama to our kids in cages but a crime against humanity when Trump does it ( based solely on the basis that trump does it more often), rational conversation isn’t possible.

when you deny any rational inference that Hunters job could be related to who his dad was, rational conversation is difficult.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you’ve called me angry god knows how many times. it’s what intellectual wimps do when (1) they can’t respond to the case you’ve made, and (2) can’t admit you might have a point. You want me to pull up a few of your vile posts - and many are not w/o anything close to that by who your insulting.

Paul, i also like jousting with you most of the time, but your differing rules depending on party are becoming much more glaring. Be a bit less like Pete and a bit more like ririckhound.

I dont believe i insult specific people here for no reason. i do it when i have a terrific reason.You constantly liberals are this and liberals are that. Yet for some reason don't think it is insulting.

You desperately try to make me out to be a blind conservative partisan. it’s not close to true. but you play that card anyway. there have been plenty of posts here where i’ve sided with liberals, i have been in the exact opposite side of issues with Scott and detbuch and SD. but i can disagree with them respectfully. you guys make it very tough.

when pete says it was ok for obama to our kids in cages but a crime against humanity when Trump does it ( based solely on the basis that trump does it more often), rational conversation isn’t possible. Trump had a blanket policy to do it to all children. Obama's policy was to do it where they weren't sure if the child was with their parent or other similar reason so it wasn't the same.

when you deny any rational inference that Hunters job could be related to who his dad was, rational conversation is difficult.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I never said Hunter didn't get the job bc of this dad. That is not a crime. Would it be proper for the DOJ to announce an investigation into Trump for pedo. bc Epstein was a pedo and Trump is on camara saying he hung out w/Epstein liked "young girls"?

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I never said Hunter didn't get the job bc of this dad. That is not a crime.

No
But it is the very definition of nepotism. Which you say did not happen in a different thread. You epitomize the looney,lying left.
🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

No
But it is the very definition of nepotism. Which you say did not happen in a different thread. You epitomize the looney,lying left.
������
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So who at Burisma is Hunter's relative? I gave you the definition of Nepotism which showed you are totally wrong.

You epitomize the uneducated vile right who think they are right when they are wrong. You don't have anything to add so you throw childish insults out.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You epitomize the uneducated vile. .

If I said that, you'd be calling me angry...

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

If I said that, you'd be calling me angry...

Not in response to his constant childish posts.

But you are angry. Look at the other post you just made.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So who at Burisma is Hunter's relative? I gave you the definition of Nepotism which showed you are totally wrong.

You epitomize the uneducated vile right who think they are right when they are wrong. You don't have anything to add so you throw childish insults out.

Does this response imply that his father had nothing to do with getting the job? Tell us how wrong you are again.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Does this response imply that his father had nothing to do with getting the job? Tell us how wrong you are again.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Do you have any proof Biden talked, emailed, sent Rudy G. in the middle of the night to go talk to any one at Burisma? Either you do or you're wrong again.

[falkners]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

No
But it is the very definition of nepotism. Which you say did not happen in a different thread. You epitomize the looney,lying left.
🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

By definition:
Nepotism is the granting of jobs to one's relatives or friends in various fields, including business, politics, entertainment, sports, religion and other activities. Nepotism is the act of using one's power to secure better jobs or unfair advantages for a family member when they may not have the right skill, experience or motivation compared to others.

Hunter Biden getting the job was not by definition nepotism. He, perhaps, was given the job by Barisma so that they could gain favor from the then current administration. This was never alleged or proven. Donald Trump appointing his daughter and son-in-law to positions, however, IS nepotism, since neither one was qualified to have their positions. One should question why Jared, who is making Middle East Policy, got hundreds of millions of dollars of financing for his 666 building on the verge of bankruptsy, from the very people who the policies he is advocating for when virtually no one was willing to lend him money. The financial conflict of interest there is undeniable. The fact that they aren't getting a salary, is a moot point considering they are both receiving huge financial benefits by their association with the administration.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by falkners

By definition:
Nepotism is the granting of jobs to one's relatives or friends in various fields, including business, politics, entertainment, sports, religion and other activities. Nepotism is the act of using one's power to secure better jobs or unfair advantages for a family member when they may not have the right skill, experience or motivation compared to others.

Hunter Biden getting the job was not by definition nepotism. He, perhaps, was given the job by Barisma so that they could gain favor from the then current administration. This was never alleged or proven.

it's pretty obvious and I think he even admitted so in an interview





Donald Trump appointing his daughter and son-in-law to positions, however, IS nepotism, since neither one was qualified to have their positions. One should question why Jared, who is making Middle East Policy, got hundreds of millions of dollars of financing for his 666 building on the verge of bankruptsy, from the very people who the policies he is advocating for when virtually no one was willing to lend him money. The financial conflict of interest there is undeniable. The fact that they aren't getting a salary, is a moot point considering they are both receiving huge financial benefits by their association with the administration.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

how did msnbc and cnn miss this bombshell?

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by falkners

By definition:
Nepotism is the granting of jobs to one's relatives or friends in various fields, including business, politics, entertainment, sports, religion and other activities. Nepotism is the act of using one's power to secure better jobs or unfair advantages for a family member when they may not have the right skill, experience or motivation compared to others.

Hunter Biden getting the job was not by definition nepotism. He, perhaps, was given the job by Barisma so that they could gain favor from the then current administration. This was never alleged or proven. Donald Trump appointing his daughter and son-in-law to positions, however, IS nepotism, since neither one was qualified to have their positions. One should question why Jared, who is making Middle East Policy, got hundreds of millions of dollars of financing for his 666 building on the verge of bankruptsy, from the very people who the policies he is advocating for when virtually no one was willing to lend him money. The financial conflict of interest there is undeniable. The fact that they aren't getting a salary, is a moot point considering they are both receiving huge financial benefits by their association with the administration.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You won’t find an argument here. Great work uncovering that evidence 👍🏿. But if you don’t think Daddy got Hunter the job then you are being dishonest or you need to read up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

You won’t find an argument here. Great work uncovering that evidence 👍🏿. But if you don’t think Daddy got Hunter the job then you are being dishonest or you need to read up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

but you claimed it was nepotism which proves you didn't know the definition. And since you mentioned evidence, I've asked you repeatedly show us some evidence Joe Biden did anything to find Hunter Biden a job?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device